本文選題：班輪公司　切入點：航運　出處：《大連海事大學》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：近些年,航運市場上班輪公司之間的聯(lián)營動作越發(fā)頻繁,單單2014年這一年內(nèi),從P3聯(lián)盟開始一直到后來的2M、O3聯(lián)盟以及G6、CKYHE聯(lián)盟的反擊,全球班輪市場的格局持續(xù)地動蕩起伏,這也造成了尤其是托運人一方對班輪公司的一系列聯(lián)營行為是否會造成航運市場上壟斷的擔憂。針對這一現(xiàn)象,本文將對航運聯(lián)營體和航運聯(lián)盟等班輪公司之間的聯(lián)營行為進行介紹,鑒于我國目前法律并沒有針對航運聯(lián)營壟斷作具體規(guī)定,為了解決托運人等當事人的擔憂,保護相關當事人的利益,發(fā)展我國航運市場,建立我國在航運聯(lián)營方面的反壟斷規(guī)制體制,本文將通過對反壟斷背后的理論依據(jù)進行分析,比較歐盟和美國航運反壟斷法和航運聯(lián)營反壟斷規(guī)制,確定適合我國航運情況的壟斷確定標準和反壟斷規(guī)制體制,并對達到壟斷標準的壟斷行為的規(guī)制以及未達到壟斷標準的聯(lián)營行為的防范提出建設性意見。行文分為以下五個部分：第一部分介紹學界對班輪公司聯(lián)營的不同界定,并分析歐盟、美國以及我國對航運聯(lián)營行為的官方定義,從而交代本文所指代的包括航運聯(lián)營體和航運聯(lián)盟在內(nèi)的聯(lián)營行為的具體含義。第二部分介紹反壟斷法背后的理論學說,包括哈佛學派的結構主義、芝加哥學派的效率主義和后芝加哥學派的策略性理論。第三部分將在反壟斷理論的基礎上分析歐盟和美國現(xiàn)行航運反壟斷法背后的理論依據(jù)和認定壟斷的標準,結合我國現(xiàn)行相關壟斷立法,為劃定我國認定航運壟斷的標準提出意見。第四部分和第五部分將通過對歐盟和美國對于航運聯(lián)營反壟斷的規(guī)制進行介紹,發(fā)現(xiàn)我國現(xiàn)行航運聯(lián)營反壟斷規(guī)制制度的不足,從而為構建我國航運聯(lián)營反壟斷制度提出相關的建議,在我國建立航運聯(lián)營的法律體系和規(guī)制體制,并從對達到壟斷標準的聯(lián)營壟斷行為的規(guī)制和對未達到壟斷標準的聯(lián)營行為的監(jiān)控兩方面提出建議。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the joint ventures between liner companies have become more and more frequent in the shipping market. In 2014 alone, the pattern of the global liner market continued to fluctuate from the beginning of the P3 alliance to the counterattack of the 2MKYHE alliance and the G6KYHE alliance. This has also raised concerns, especially on the part of shippers, about whether a series of joint ventures by liner companies will result in a monopoly in the shipping market. This paper will introduce the consortia between shipping consortia and liner companies such as the shipping alliance. In view of the fact that there are no specific regulations on the monopoly of shipping consortia in our country at present, in order to solve the concerns of shippers and other parties, To protect the interests of relevant parties, to develop the shipping market in China, and to establish the anti-monopoly regulation system in shipping consortia, this paper will analyze the theoretical basis behind the anti-monopoly. By comparing the anti-monopoly law of European Union and the United States of America and the anti-monopoly regulation of shipping joint venture, we determine the standard of monopoly and the system of anti-monopoly regulation, which are suitable for our country's shipping situation. It also puts forward constructive suggestions on the regulation of monopoly behavior that meets the monopoly standard and the prevention of joint venture behavior that does not meet the monopoly standard. The text is divided into the following five parts: the first part introduces the different definitions of liner company association in academic circles. It also analyzes the official definitions of shipping consortia in the European Union, the United States and China, The second part introduces the theory behind the anti-monopoly law, including the structuralism of Harvard School. The third part will analyze the theoretical basis and the standard of monopolization in the current shipping anti-monopoly law of the European Union and the United States on the basis of the anti-monopoly theory of the Chicago school and the strategic theory of the post-Chicago school. Combined with the current relevant monopoly legislation in our country, this paper puts forward some suggestions for delimiting the standards for determining the shipping monopoly in China. Part 4th and part 5th will introduce the anti-monopoly regulations of the European Union and the United States for the shipping association. This paper finds out the deficiency of the current anti-monopoly regulation system of China's shipping consortia, and puts forward some relevant suggestions for the construction of the anti-monopoly system of China's shipping consortia, and establishes the legal system and the regulatory system of the shipping consortia in China. Some suggestions are put forward from two aspects: the regulation of consortia 'monopoly behavior which meets the monopoly standard and the supervision of the joint venture's behavior that does not meet the monopoly standard.
【學位授予單位】：大連海事大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D922.294

【共引文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 吳官政;;我國THC問題及其解決途徑研究[J];長春理工大學學報(社會科學版);2011年08期

2 李春明;;后危機時代中國航運發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略思考[J];財經(jīng)界(學術版);2010年03期

3 劉志云;GATS框架下我國海運服務對外開放的問題探討[J];重慶交通學院學報(社會科學版);2002年04期

4 陳曦;;我國海運開放程度比較分析[J];研究生法學;2006年04期

5 秦儉;;淺談我國航運企業(yè)的國際稅收籌劃問題[J];當代經(jīng)理人;2006年21期

6 郟丙貴;;后班輪公會時代國際班輪市場管制[J];大連海事大學學報(社會科學版);2007年05期

7 馬艷飛;王曉霞;;淺析我國航運保護政策的完善[J];法制與社會;2007年03期

8 鄭玲麗;;WTO海運服務貿(mào)易自由化談判及中國的因應措施[J];法治研究;2007年07期

9 張麗英;;THC爭議與海運業(yè)反壟斷豁免問題[J];國際經(jīng)濟法學刊;2004年04期

10 馬得懿;王幸子;;我國航運補貼的制度構架[J];國際經(jīng)貿(mào)探索;2011年11期

，

本文編號：1600523