本文關(guān)鍵詞： 預付卡 監(jiān)管制度 消費者權(quán)益 備付金保險 信息記載　出處：《中國政法大學》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：我國市場經(jīng)濟體系逐步發(fā)展壯大,交易方式也不斷翻新變化。其中,預付式交易結(jié)算模式日益流行,預付卡市場愈見火爆。然而,預付卡市場繁榮的同時,卻出現(xiàn)了諸多亂象,消費者權(quán)益難以得到有效保護。為此,我國相關(guān)監(jiān)管機構(gòu)頒布了若干部門規(guī)章予以規(guī)范,有關(guān)預付卡的監(jiān)管體系初步確立。但是這一規(guī)范體系比較簡單,尚不足以有效規(guī)范整個預付卡市場,亟需進一步健全與完善。預付卡(Prepaid Card)是近些年來市場上廣泛存在的一種交易結(jié)算手段。因為其將貨款提前支出并儲存于卡片中,消費者攜帶方便且不用記名,商家也可提前回籠資金,因此具有廣泛的應用領(lǐng)域,深受消費者和商家的喜愛。與其他類卡片不同,預付卡具有預付性、見卡即付性、格式性和小額支付的特征。根據(jù)不同標準,預付卡可做不同分類。預付卡不同于一般民事合同法律關(guān)系,既不是一般的買賣合同,不同于借貸合同,也不同于貨幣、證券或其他金融工具。預付卡市場的種種亂象不僅侵害了眾多消費者的合法權(quán)益,也存在洗錢犯罪的風險,會擾亂金融秩序,更會增加偷稅漏稅的渠道,因而對其監(jiān)管十分必要,有利于使其朝著公平與誠信的方向發(fā)展。世界各國（地區(qū)）對預付卡監(jiān)管的模式各有特色。美國由數(shù)個機構(gòu)分工協(xié)作,并對預付卡做了分類管理,通過信息公開及責任限額制度保護消費者的權(quán)益。日本實行以內(nèi)閣大臣為主的集權(quán)監(jiān)管,對預付卡實施分類申報登記,地位繼承制度、保證金與保全契約制度都是日本的重要制度。加拿大魁北克省則規(guī)定了告知解釋義務和返還余額義務,并要求不得收取額外費用。我國臺灣地區(qū)規(guī)定了預付卡必須記載和不得記載的事項,并采取了多種可選擇的履約保證方式。這些制度對我國完善預付卡監(jiān)管有較好的借鑒意義。我國央行和商務部經(jīng)過初步探索,發(fā)布了若干部門規(guī)章來規(guī)范預付卡市場。主要的制度框架有:防止擅自挪用客戶資金的備付金存管制度;防止行賄受賄等違法行為的實名購卡制度;降低違法犯罪可能性的非現(xiàn)金購卡制度以及若干維護消費者權(quán)益制度。但我國的這一制度體系面臨著較大的挑戰(zhàn)。備付金利息歸屬有待明確,也尚未有效利用;實名購卡制被重重規(guī)避而落實困難;對網(wǎng)絡交易平臺尚缺乏有效規(guī)制;眾多非法人企業(yè)和個體工商戶也并未納入監(jiān)管范圍。有鑒于此,我國應當在現(xiàn)有框架基礎上進一步完善相關(guān)制度。首先,用客戶備付金產(chǎn)生的利息建立起備付金保險制度;其次,擴大強制性非現(xiàn)金結(jié)算的范圍;再次,落實實名購卡制度;又次,對網(wǎng)絡交易平臺預付卡業(yè)務實行分類監(jiān)管;最后,將各類發(fā)卡主體全面納入監(jiān)管范圍,并通過限制發(fā)行權(quán)、登記備案、信息記載等方式予以規(guī)范。
[Abstract]:The market economy system of our country is gradually developing and expanding, and the trading methods are constantly changing. Among them, the prepaid trading and settlement mode is becoming more and more popular, and the prepaid card market is becoming more and more popular. However, while the prepaid card market is booming, there has been a lot of chaos at the same time. It is difficult to effectively protect the rights and interests of consumers. For this reason, the relevant regulatory bodies of our country have promulgated a number of departmental regulations to regulate them, and the regulatory system on prepaid cards has been preliminarily established. However, this regulatory system is relatively simple. It is not enough to regulate the whole prepaid card market effectively, and it needs to be further improved and perfected. Prepaid Card is a widely used transaction settlement method in the market in recent years, because it stores the payment in advance and stores the payment in the card. Consumers are easy to carry and can withdraw funds in advance, so they have a wide range of applications and are deeply loved by consumers and merchants. Unlike other types of cards, prepaid cards are prepaid, see card pay-as-you-go, The characteristics of format and small payment. According to different standards, prepaid cards can be classified differently. Prepaid cards are different from general civil contract legal relations, and are not ordinary contracts of sale and purchase, different from loan contracts, and also different from currencies, Securities or other financial instruments. All kinds of chaos in the prepaid card market not only infringes on the legitimate rights and interests of many consumers, but also has the risk of money laundering crimes, which will disrupt the financial order and increase the channels for tax evasion and tax evasion. Therefore, it is necessary to supervise it, which is conducive to its development towards the direction of fairness and integrity. The modes of prepaid card regulation in various countries (regions) have their own characteristics. The United States has a division of labor and cooperation among several institutions, and has made a classification of prepaid cards. To protect the rights and interests of consumers through the information disclosure and liability limitation system. Japan has implemented centralized supervision by cabinet ministers, classified declaration and registration of prepaid cards, and status inheritance system. Both the bond and preservation contracts are important systems in Japan. Quebec, Canada, imposes an obligation to explain and return the balance. The Taiwan area of our country has stipulated that prepayment cards must be recorded and must not be recorded. And has adopted many kinds of optional performance guarantee methods. These systems have good reference significance for our country to perfect the supervision of prepaid card. The central bank and the Ministry of Commerce of our country have preliminarily explored, A number of departmental regulations have been issued to regulate the prepaid card market. The main institutional frameworks are: the reserve deposit system to prevent unauthorized embezzlement of customer funds; the system of buying cards by real names to prevent illegal acts such as bribery and bribery; The system of non-cash purchase card and some system of safeguarding consumer's rights and interests, which can reduce the possibility of illegal crime, but the system of our country is faced with great challenge, the ownership of interest of reserve fund is not clear, and it has not been used effectively. The real name purchase card system is difficult to implement due to its circumvention; there is still a lack of effective regulation on the online trading platform; and many unincorporated enterprises and individual industrial and commercial households have not been included in the scope of supervision. China should further improve the relevant systems on the basis of the existing framework. Firstly, the reserve insurance system should be established with the interest generated by the customer reserve; secondly, the scope of compulsory non-cash settlement should be expanded; thirdly, the system of real name purchase cards should be implemented. Again, the network trading platform prepaid card business classification supervision; finally, all kinds of card issuers into the scope of supervision, and by restricting the right to issue, registration and filing, information recording and other ways to regulate.
【學位授予單位】：中國政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D922.28

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 閆海;劉闖;;論非金融機構(gòu)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)支付中客戶備付金的性質(zhì)、歸屬及監(jiān)管[J];西南金融;2013年09期

2 李莉莎;;第三方電子支付中備付金的法律風險辨析[J];人民論壇;2013年11期

3 萬李霞;曠潔玉;;第三方支付平臺備付金法律監(jiān)管問題研究——以《支付機構(gòu)客戶備付金存管暫行辦法(征求意見稿)》為視角[J];商場現(xiàn)代化;2012年20期

4 呂斌;;支付業(yè)利息大餐漸行漸近[J];法人;2011年12期

5 本刊編輯部;張幸格;;購物卡走俏 莫讓腐敗進入“卡時代”[J];決策探索(下半月);2011年11期

6 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)會議論文 前1條

1 唐波;黃驁;;對《支付機構(gòu)客戶備付金存管辦法》的幾點思考[A];金融法學家（第五輯）[C];2013年

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條

1 見習記者 何tk;匯繳賬戶每日清零 央行嚴堵備付金挪用[N];21世紀經(jīng)濟報道;2011年

2 記者 牛娟娟;備付金管理進一步細化強化[N];金融時報;2013年

3 本報記者 唐婭萍 通訊員 尹文誠;探索客戶備付金監(jiān)管到戶新模式[N];金融時報;2014年

4 中國工商銀行平頂山分行 常民恩 焦杰;規(guī)范備付金比例考核機制[N];金融時報;2000年

5 黃海濤　崔世偉;對儲匯兩網(wǎng)互通后備付金管理的思考[N];中國郵政報;2005年

6 早報記者 張颯;支付商吁不要全額存放備付金[N];東方早報;2010年

7 劉暢;強化備付金監(jiān)管有助于銀企雙贏[N];經(jīng)濟日報;2011年

8 記者 李丹丹;對預付卡備付金醞釀更嚴格監(jiān)管[N];上海證券報;2011年

9 記者 牛娟娟;加強對客戶備付金管理 切實保障當事人合法權(quán)益[N];金融時報;2011年

10 記者 曹金玲;央行官員：第三方支付備付金管理辦法及配套辦法將陸續(xù)出臺[N];第一財經(jīng)日報;2012年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前6條

1 郜資源;第三方支付客戶備付金的法律問題研究[D];廣西大學;2015年

2 周秋妤;第三方線上支付金融監(jiān)管的法律研究[D];天津財經(jīng)大學;2015年

3 劉敏;我國預付卡監(jiān)管法律制度研究[D];中國政法大學;2015年

4 尚鵬岳;銀行現(xiàn)金備付金優(yōu)化管理[D];浙江大學;2003年

5 常鐘文;基于遺傳模擬退火算法的ATM備付金管理動態(tài)規(guī)劃模型及實證研究[D];東北大學;2012年

6 宋慧敏;基于MD5與DES的客戶備付金存管系統(tǒng)設計與實現(xiàn)[D];太原理工大學;2014年

，

本文編號：1500780