【摘要】：社會(huì)的和諧以家庭的和諧為基礎(chǔ)，而家庭的和諧又與婚姻關(guān)系的穩(wěn)定戚戚相關(guān)。重婚行為是破壞家庭婚姻關(guān)系，影響家庭和社會(huì)和諧的重要因素。為了規(guī)制重婚行為，我國(guó)《刑法》第二百五十八規(guī)定：“有配偶而重婚的，或者明知他人有配偶而與之結(jié)婚的，處二年以下有期徒刑或者拘役�！比欢�，在我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐中，重婚罪的認(rèn)定卻存在諸多問(wèn)題，如重婚罪的客體問(wèn)題、事實(shí)重婚問(wèn)題、瑕疵重婚問(wèn)題、重婚罪的追訴時(shí)效等。 本文共分為四個(gè)部分。第一部分論述的是重婚罪的客體問(wèn)題。筆者從配偶權(quán)和一夫一妻制的概念入手，引入我國(guó)刑法學(xué)界對(duì)于重婚罪客體的不同觀點(diǎn)并結(jié)合司法實(shí)踐中相關(guān)案例進(jìn)行分析，最終認(rèn)為重婚罪的客體應(yīng)是“一夫一妻制度”。 第二部分論述的是事實(shí)重婚問(wèn)題。筆者首先介紹了其他國(guó)家和地區(qū)事實(shí)婚姻的情況，然后對(duì)刑法中的事實(shí)婚姻做了一個(gè)界定，筆者認(rèn)為，刑法中的“事實(shí)婚姻”是指男女雙方均已達(dá)到法定的結(jié)婚年齡，無(wú)直系和旁系三代以?xún)?nèi)的血緣關(guān)系，未患有醫(yī)學(xué)上認(rèn)為不適宜結(jié)婚的疾病，以永遠(yuǎn)共同生活為目標(biāo)，未經(jīng)登記便公開(kāi)的以夫妻名義同居在一起。最后，筆者對(duì)事實(shí)重婚的成立要件進(jìn)行了論述。筆者認(rèn)為，事實(shí)重婚可以構(gòu)成重婚罪，但需具體情況具體分析。 第三部分論述的是瑕疵重婚問(wèn)題。筆者首先通過(guò)司法實(shí)踐中相關(guān)案例引出了問(wèn)題，并對(duì)“宣告死亡”、無(wú)效和可撤消婚姻在刑法上的效力進(jìn)行了論述，對(duì)重婚罪中的“有配偶”進(jìn)行了解釋。筆者認(rèn)為，程序瑕疵的重婚行為不能構(gòu)成重婚罪，事實(shí)瑕疵的重婚行為應(yīng)以重婚罪論處。 第四部分論述的是重婚罪的追訴時(shí)效問(wèn)題。對(duì)于重婚罪的追訴時(shí)效，我國(guó)刑法學(xué)界眾說(shuō)紛紜。筆者通過(guò)對(duì)主要學(xué)術(shù)觀點(diǎn)的評(píng)析和其他國(guó)家對(duì)于重婚罪追訴時(shí)效的特殊規(guī)定的比較，，已提出了一個(gè)相對(duì)完善的重婚罪追訴時(shí)效計(jì)算方法。筆者認(rèn)為，在我國(guó)現(xiàn)行的法律規(guī)定下，將重婚罪區(qū)分為法律重婚和事實(shí)重婚，然后法律重婚以領(lǐng)取重婚的結(jié)婚證之日起計(jì)算追訴時(shí)效；事實(shí)重婚則以刑法意義上的事實(shí)婚姻關(guān)系解除之日起計(jì)算追訴時(shí)效是最合理的。
[Abstract]:The harmony of society is based on the harmony of family, and the harmony of family is closely related to the stability of marriage. Bigamy is an important factor that destroys family marriage and affects family and social harmony. In order to regulate bigamy, Article 258 of the Criminal Law of our country stipulates: "whoever has a spouse or marries him knowing that another person has a spouse shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than two years or criminal detention." However, in the judicial practice of our country, there are many problems in the cognizance of bigamy, such as the object of bigamy, the problem of factual bigamy, the problem of defective bigamy, the limitation of prosecution of bigamy, and so on. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part discusses the object of bigamy. Starting with the concepts of spouse right and monogamy, the author introduces different viewpoints on the object of bigamy in the field of criminal law in our country and analyzes them in combination with relevant cases in judicial practice. Finally, the author holds that the object of bigamy should be "monogyny system". The second part discusses the problem of factual bigamy. The author first introduces the situation of de facto marriage in other countries and regions, and then defines the de facto marriage in criminal law. The author believes that "de facto marriage" in criminal law refers to the fact that both men and women have reached the legal age of marriage. There is no consanguineous relationship between the immediate and adjacent families within three generations, there is no disease that is considered unsuitable for marriage in medicine, and the goal is to live together forever, and live together in the name of husband and wife without registration. Finally, the author discusses the establishment elements of de facto bigamy. The author believes that bigamy can constitute the crime of bigamy, but the specific situation needs to be analyzed. The third part discusses the problem of defective bigamy. First of all, the author raises the problems through the relevant cases in judicial practice, and discusses the effect of "declaration of death", annulment and annulment of marriage in criminal law, and explains the "spouse" in the crime of bigamy. The author believes that bigamy with procedural defects can not constitute bigamy, and bigamy with factual defects should be treated as bigamy. The fourth part discusses the statute of limitations of bigamy. There are different opinions on the statute of limitations of bigamy in the field of criminal law in our country. Through the analysis of the main academic viewpoints and the comparison of the special provisions of the statute of limitations for bigamy in other countries, the author has put forward a relatively perfect method for calculating the statute of limitations for bigamy. The author believes that under the current legal provisions of our country, the crime of bigamy is divided into legal bigamy and de facto bigamy, and then legal bigamy is calculated from the date of obtaining bigamy certificate. Factual bigamy is the most reasonable to calculate the statute of limitations from the date of dissolution of de facto marriage in the sense of criminal law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923.9

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 溫文治,陳洪兵;對(duì)重婚罪的重新解讀——兼對(duì)妨害婚姻、家庭罪整體搬遷之利弊分析[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期

2 韓玉勝;;關(guān)于重婚罪幾個(gè)問(wèn)題的探討[J];法律學(xué)習(xí)與研究;1987年01期

3 余延滿(mǎn);論婚姻的成立[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2004年05期

4 王旭霞;;事實(shí)婚姻法律地位之分析[J];甘肅省經(jīng)濟(jì)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

5 齊曉伶;張訓(xùn);;重婚罪內(nèi)涵之實(shí)踐檢視——從一則“同性戀非法同居”案例說(shuō)起[J];甘肅社會(huì)科學(xué);2010年04期

6 何榮功;;財(cái)產(chǎn)罪法益新論[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年01期

7 劉麗萍;;非法吸收公眾存款罪的法益探求[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期

8 晉濤;;開(kāi)放視野下的重婚罪探析[J];淮北師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年01期

9 蔡大宇,魏干;論重婚罪的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];河南公安高等專(zhuān)科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2004年03期

10 魏漢濤;;以客觀解釋論解讀重婚罪[J];海南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 文亞苗;重婚罪的立法完善研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2009年

本文編號(hào)：2478265