【摘要】：隨著現(xiàn)行家事訴訟改革的推進(jìn),法院調(diào)解取代依法審判成為家事訴訟糾紛解決的主要方式。在家事訴訟中,片面追求調(diào)解結(jié)案的局限和不足日益凸顯。因此有必要反思家事訴訟改革的方向,實(shí)現(xiàn)家事訴訟糾紛的法律規(guī)范化解決。在家事訴訟過程中,不論是當(dāng)事人證明待證事實(shí),還是法官認(rèn)定案件事實(shí),一切活動(dòng)都是圍繞著訴訟證據(jù)進(jìn)行。家事訴訟糾紛法律規(guī)范化解決有賴于證據(jù)的恰當(dāng)運(yùn)用,訴訟證據(jù)是整個(gè)訴訟活動(dòng)的核心。但是,家事糾紛不同于一般的民事糾紛,其特殊性主要體現(xiàn)在訴訟證明的困難。要實(shí)現(xiàn)家事訴訟糾紛的法律規(guī)范化解決,就需要建立家事訴訟證明司法能動(dòng)機(jī)制,構(gòu)建家事訴訟示范證據(jù)運(yùn)用規(guī)則體系,指引當(dāng)事人進(jìn)行取證和舉證,規(guī)范法官進(jìn)行釋明和認(rèn)證。文章主體分為四個(gè)部分。首先,對(duì)家事訴訟示范證據(jù)進(jìn)行概述,闡述證據(jù)運(yùn)用在家事訴訟活動(dòng)中的核心地位,引出家事訴訟示范證據(jù)的含義。接著,分析家事訴訟證據(jù)運(yùn)用的司法現(xiàn)狀及其成因,即家事訴訟證據(jù)運(yùn)用的困難。接著,論證家事訴訟示范證據(jù)的指引和規(guī)范機(jī)能對(duì)家事訴訟證據(jù)運(yùn)用之困難的化解,既是對(duì)前一部分的回應(yīng),也是對(duì)下一部分構(gòu)建家事訴訟示范證據(jù)運(yùn)用規(guī)則體系的鋪墊。最后,根據(jù)家事訴訟活動(dòng)的進(jìn)程,從確立待證事實(shí)確認(rèn)規(guī)則、當(dāng)事人舉證規(guī)則、法官釋明規(guī)則、法官認(rèn)證規(guī)則等方面,構(gòu)建家事訴訟示范證據(jù)運(yùn)用規(guī)則體系,為家事訴訟主體提供司法證明上的指引和事實(shí)認(rèn)定上的規(guī)范。
[Abstract]:With the advancement of the current reform of family litigation, court mediation has become the main way to settle disputes in family litigation instead of adjudication according to law. In family litigation, the limitation and insufficiency of one-sided pursuit of mediation and closure are increasingly prominent. Therefore, it is necessary to reflect on the direction of family litigation reform and to realize the legal standardization of resolving family litigation disputes. In the process of family action, whether the parties prove the facts to be proved or the judge determines the facts of the case, all the activities are carried out around the evidence of litigation. The standardized settlement of family litigation disputes depends on the proper use of evidence, which is the core of the whole litigation activity. However, family disputes are different from common civil disputes, and their particularities are mainly reflected in the difficulty of litigation proof. In order to realize the legal standardization of resolving family litigation disputes, it is necessary to establish the judicial active mechanism of family litigation proof, to construct a system of rules for the application of demonstration evidence in family litigation, and to guide the parties to collect evidence and prove evidence. Regulate the interpretation and certification of judges. The main body of the article is divided into four parts. First of all, the paper summarizes the model evidence of family litigation, expounds the core position of evidence in family litigation, and leads to the meaning of model evidence in family litigation. Then, the author analyzes the judicial status and causes of the application of family litigation evidence, that is, the difficulties in the application of family litigation evidence. Then, it is not only the response to the former part, but also the foreshadowing for the next part to construct the rules system of the application of the model evidence in the family litigation, which is not only the response to the former part, but also the solution of the guidance and normative function of the demonstration evidence in the family litigation to resolve the difficulty of the application of the family lawsuit evidence. Finally, according to the process of family action, from the establishment of the rules of confirming the facts to be proved, the rules of proof of the parties, the rules of interpretation by the judges, the rules of the authentication of the judges, and so on, the system of rules for the application of the model evidence in the family litigation is constructed. To provide judicial evidence for the main body of family litigation and the norms of the facts.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華僑大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D925.1;D923.9

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蘇滿滿;淺談詢問中證據(jù)運(yùn)用的原則[J];中國監(jiān)察;2002年13期

2 梁文華;論執(zhí)行工作中的證據(jù)運(yùn)用[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年S1期

3 王成;電子數(shù)據(jù)的證據(jù)運(yùn)用[J];通信企業(yè)管理;2002年07期

4 何永水,韓立峰;論證據(jù)運(yùn)用中人權(quán)保障的缺陷及完善設(shè)想[J];河北科技大學(xué)人民警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年01期

5 張愈;;戰(zhàn)場證據(jù)運(yùn)用的六種途徑[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年04期

6 王銀;涉外犯罪案件的證據(jù)運(yùn)用[J];西北第二民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1995年02期

7 李永軍;訊問中的證據(jù)運(yùn)用原則[J];人民檢察;1997年05期

8 李發(fā)友;;刑事證據(jù)運(yùn)用中存在的問題及對(duì)策[J];民營科技;2010年09期

9 邱愛民;論司法實(shí)踐中證據(jù)運(yùn)用問題的若干誤區(qū)[J];學(xué)海;2001年04期

10 白似冰;;司法實(shí)踐中證據(jù)運(yùn)用存在的問題及完善[J];遼寧公安司法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前4條

1 中國政法大學(xué) 卞建林 山東省鄒平市人民檢察院 鄒長恩;規(guī)范證據(jù)運(yùn)用 防止冤假錯(cuò)案[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

2 河南省淅川縣人民法院 魏建國 謝蕊娜;電子證據(jù)運(yùn)用問題探析[N];人民法院報(bào);2013年

3 宋世杰;證據(jù)運(yùn)用中的問題及其補(bǔ)救[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2002年

4 邱學(xué)鋒;刑事證據(jù)運(yùn)用中的問題及建議[N];江蘇法制報(bào);2014年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前8條

1 王云飛;貪污賄賂案件的事實(shí)認(rèn)定與證據(jù)運(yùn)用研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2015年

2 陳曦;偵探小說的推理模式與證據(jù)運(yùn)用[D];山東大學(xué);2017年

3 王樤n，

本文編號(hào)：2399522