論離婚訴訟與法官職權(quán)的有機契合
發(fā)布時間:2018-12-29 08:09
【摘要】:隨著社會經(jīng)濟的不斷進步與發(fā)展,婚姻結(jié)構(gòu)的變化,我國離婚訴訟案件數(shù)量越來越多,離婚訴訟作為民事訴訟的一種,也是人身訴訟的典型。這種特殊的人身訴訟在訴訟過程中需要特殊去對待處理。所以筆者正文第一章首先從離婚案件本身所具有的特點及對訴訟程序有著特殊需求的特點的角度對離婚訴訟的基本特征進行了分析。由于離婚案件本身具有社會公益性、牽連性、調(diào)解前置性、隱私性和特殊心理性的特征,與一般的民事訴訟存在著巨大的差別。因此離婚訴訟在其適用程序上需要法官依職權(quán)調(diào)查取證、考慮雙方未提出的事實、對訴訟程序進行的控制和法官的釋明權(quán)的特點。正文第二章筆者從合法性理論、協(xié)同主義理論和訴訟價值理論角度分析了離婚訴訟與法官職權(quán)契合的合理性。但是我國離婚訴訟的現(xiàn)狀很不樂觀,在我國當(dāng)前的審判實踐中,往往將離婚訴訟這種特殊的家事訴訟按照普通的財產(chǎn)訴訟處理,并未對離婚訴訟的特殊性予以關(guān)注,再加上當(dāng)事人主義的提倡,使離婚訴訟這種特殊的需要加強法官職權(quán)干預(yù)的訴訟與提倡當(dāng)事人主導(dǎo)訴訟程序的當(dāng)事人主義訴訟模式之間的矛盾更加突出。針對目前出現(xiàn)的問題,筆者認(rèn)為應(yīng)該通過積極建立離婚訴訟制度,設(shè)立婚姻訴訟案件審判庭,并加強法官隊伍建設(shè),配備離婚訴訟專職法官等方法去解決。
[Abstract]:With the development of social economy and the change of marriage structure, there are more and more divorce cases in our country. As a kind of civil action, divorce lawsuit is also a typical case of personal action. This kind of special personal lawsuit needs special treatment in the process of litigation. In the first chapter, the author analyzes the basic characteristics of divorce proceedings from the point of view of the characteristics of divorce cases and the special needs of the proceedings. Because the divorce case itself has the characteristics of social welfare, implicature, mediation preposition, privacy and special psychology, there is a huge difference between divorce cases and general civil litigation. Therefore, divorce proceedings need judges to investigate and collect evidence ex officio, to consider the facts not presented by both parties, to control the proceedings and to explain the characteristics of judges. In the second chapter, the author analyzes the rationality of the agreement between divorce litigation and judges' powers from the perspectives of legality theory, synergetic theory and litigation value theory. However, the status quo of divorce proceedings in our country is not optimistic. In our country's current trial practice, divorce litigation is often handled in accordance with ordinary property litigation, without paying attention to the particularity of divorce proceedings. In addition, the advocacy of litigant doctrine makes the contradiction between the lawsuit of divorce, which needs to strengthen the intervention of judge's power, and the litigant litigation mode, which advocates the litigant to lead the proceedings, is more prominent. In view of the existing problems, the author thinks that we should set up the divorce lawsuit system, set up the matrimonial lawsuit case trial court, strengthen the construction of the judge team, and equip the divorce lawsuit full-time judge to solve the problem.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2011
【分類號】:D923.9;D925.1;D926.2
本文編號:2394561
[Abstract]:With the development of social economy and the change of marriage structure, there are more and more divorce cases in our country. As a kind of civil action, divorce lawsuit is also a typical case of personal action. This kind of special personal lawsuit needs special treatment in the process of litigation. In the first chapter, the author analyzes the basic characteristics of divorce proceedings from the point of view of the characteristics of divorce cases and the special needs of the proceedings. Because the divorce case itself has the characteristics of social welfare, implicature, mediation preposition, privacy and special psychology, there is a huge difference between divorce cases and general civil litigation. Therefore, divorce proceedings need judges to investigate and collect evidence ex officio, to consider the facts not presented by both parties, to control the proceedings and to explain the characteristics of judges. In the second chapter, the author analyzes the rationality of the agreement between divorce litigation and judges' powers from the perspectives of legality theory, synergetic theory and litigation value theory. However, the status quo of divorce proceedings in our country is not optimistic. In our country's current trial practice, divorce litigation is often handled in accordance with ordinary property litigation, without paying attention to the particularity of divorce proceedings. In addition, the advocacy of litigant doctrine makes the contradiction between the lawsuit of divorce, which needs to strengthen the intervention of judge's power, and the litigant litigation mode, which advocates the litigant to lead the proceedings, is more prominent. In view of the existing problems, the author thinks that we should set up the divorce lawsuit system, set up the matrimonial lawsuit case trial court, strengthen the construction of the judge team, and equip the divorce lawsuit full-time judge to solve the problem.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2011
【分類號】:D923.9;D925.1;D926.2
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 郭美松;;設(shè)立具有中國特色人事訴訟程序之構(gòu)想[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年05期
2 何文燕;劉波;;我國當(dāng)事人陳述制度之檢討與重構(gòu)——兼評民訴法《修改建議稿(第三稿)及立法理由》第十七章[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報);2007年02期
3 莊淑珍,董天夫;我國代表人訴訟制度與美國集團訴訟制度的比較研究[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報);1996年02期
4 蔡虹,劉加良;弱勢群體的民事訴訟法保護論綱[J];河南大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2004年06期
5 何家弘;論司法證明的目的和標(biāo)準(zhǔn)——兼論司法證明的基本概念和范疇[J];法學(xué)研究;2001年06期
6 顧培東;論我國民事權(quán)利司法保護的疏失[J];法學(xué)研究;2002年06期
7 張衛(wèi)平;起訴條件與實體判決要件[J];法學(xué)研究;2004年06期
8 唐力;對話與溝通:民事訴訟構(gòu)造之法理分析[J];法學(xué)研究;2005年01期
9 馬文艷;芻議ADR機制在我國的建立[J];律師世界;2003年11期
10 張曉茹;;論我國海事強制令制度之完善[J];人民司法;2006年04期
,本文編號:2394561
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/hyflw/2394561.html