論有撫養(yǎng)關(guān)系繼父母子女關(guān)系的形成
發(fā)布時間：2018-11-27 09:50
【摘要】：改革開放以來,隨著經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展,我國再婚家庭數(shù)量也明顯增多,相對應(yīng)地,繼父母子女關(guān)系也大量出現(xiàn)。繼父母子女之間沒有直接的血緣關(guān)系,但卻直接影響著再婚家庭的穩(wěn)定,直接關(guān)系到繼子女尤其是未成年子女的切身利益,對繼父母子女關(guān)系的調(diào)整離不開法律這一手段。但我國現(xiàn)有法律體系對離婚后必然產(chǎn)生的單親子女關(guān)系及繼父母子女關(guān)系關(guān)注甚少�，F(xiàn)行的法律對繼父母子女關(guān)系的規(guī)定比較原則化,缺乏具體的可操作性標(biāo)準(zhǔn),因此,在實踐中對繼父母子女關(guān)系問題,尤其是在撫養(yǎng)關(guān)系的繼父母子女關(guān)系的認(rèn)定問題上,存在很多爭議和分歧。本文擬對繼父母子女關(guān)系中撫養(yǎng)關(guān)系的形成、認(rèn)定等問題進(jìn)行探討,提出完善繼父母子女關(guān)系的建議和具體設(shè)想。 本文共分為四個部分：第一部分為繼父母子女關(guān)系概述,這部分探討繼父母子女的概念、種類,及認(rèn)定撫養(yǎng)關(guān)系形成的重要性。第二部分提出繼父母與繼子女間形成撫養(yǎng)關(guān)系的參考因素,這部分重點探討四個參考因素：(一)是否需共同生活；(二)繼父母是否需要承擔(dān)繼子女的撫養(yǎng)費用一部分或者大部分；(三)是否需要撫養(yǎng)達(dá)一定的年限；(四)雙方是否需要具有形成撫養(yǎng)關(guān)系的主觀意圖；等等。第三部分介紹和比較繼父母子女關(guān)系相關(guān)問題的國外立法例,介紹其他國家的立法經(jīng)驗,比如加拿大的“實際父母”的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)及相關(guān)規(guī)定；瑞士法律中繼父母子女關(guān)系的基本規(guī)定及評析,等等。第四部分關(guān)于我國有撫養(yǎng)關(guān)系的繼父母子女關(guān)系的形成現(xiàn)狀及立法完善的建議,首先介紹了我國在這方面的立法現(xiàn)狀并進(jìn)行了評析,再從二個方面提出完善建議：(一)以要式法律形式形成繼父母子女關(guān)系；(二)對事實撫養(yǎng)關(guān)系形成的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)應(yīng)同時符合三個條件,達(dá)到條件,我們就應(yīng)認(rèn)為這種條件下的繼父母與繼子女己形成撫養(yǎng)關(guān)系,他們產(chǎn)生的權(quán)利義務(wù)關(guān)系,已轉(zhuǎn)化為法律上的父母子女間權(quán)利義務(wù)關(guān)系。三個條件是：繼父母與繼子女在一起共同生活、繼父母對繼子女的撫養(yǎng)教育要達(dá)到一定的年限、雙方具有形成撫養(yǎng)關(guān)系的主觀意圖。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, with the development of economy, the number of remarried families in China has increased obviously. There is no direct blood relationship between step-parents and children, but it directly affects the stability of remarried families, and directly relates to the immediate interests of stepchildren, especially minor children. The adjustment of stepparents' and children's relationship cannot be separated from the means of law. However, the existing legal system of our country pays little attention to the relationship between single parent and stepparent. The provisions of the current law on the relationship between stepparents and children are more principled and lack of specific operational standards. Therefore, in practice, the relationship between stepparents and children, especially the relationship between stepparents and children, is recognized in practice. There are many disputes and disagreements. This paper discusses the formation and determination of the relationship between stepparents and children, and puts forward some suggestions and specific ideas to improve the relationship between stepparents and children. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part is an overview of the relationship between stepparents and children, this part discusses the concept of stepparents and children, types, and the importance of determining the formation of the relationship between parents and children. The second part puts forward the reference factors of the relationship between stepparents and stepchildren, which focus on four reference factors: (1) whether to live together; (2) whether the stepparents need to bear part or most of the maintenance costs of the stepchildren; (3) whether the stepchildren need to be raised for a certain period of time; (4) whether the two parties need to have subjective intention to form a dependency relationship; and so on. The third part introduces and compares the foreign legislation examples about the relationship between stepparents and children, and introduces the legislative experience of other countries, such as Canada's "actual parents" standards and related provisions; Swiss law relays the basic rules and comments on the relationship between parents and children, and so on. The fourth part is about the status quo of stepparent and child relationship and the suggestion of legislation perfection. Firstly, it introduces the current situation of our country's legislation in this respect and evaluates it. Then put forward from two aspects to improve the proposal: (1) to form the relationship between stepparents and children in the form of law; (2) the criteria for the determination of the formation of the factual dependency relationship. The determination criteria should meet three conditions at the same time and meet the conditions. We should consider that the stepparents and stepchildren have formed a dependency relationship under this condition, and that they have the right and obligation relationship. It has been transformed into a legal relationship of rights and obligations between parents and children. There are three conditions: stepparents and stepchildren live together, stepparents should have a certain number of years of education for stepchildren, and both sides have the subjective intention of forming a dependency relationship.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.9
本文編號：2360288
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, with the development of economy, the number of remarried families in China has increased obviously. There is no direct blood relationship between step-parents and children, but it directly affects the stability of remarried families, and directly relates to the immediate interests of stepchildren, especially minor children. The adjustment of stepparents' and children's relationship cannot be separated from the means of law. However, the existing legal system of our country pays little attention to the relationship between single parent and stepparent. The provisions of the current law on the relationship between stepparents and children are more principled and lack of specific operational standards. Therefore, in practice, the relationship between stepparents and children, especially the relationship between stepparents and children, is recognized in practice. There are many disputes and disagreements. This paper discusses the formation and determination of the relationship between stepparents and children, and puts forward some suggestions and specific ideas to improve the relationship between stepparents and children. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part is an overview of the relationship between stepparents and children, this part discusses the concept of stepparents and children, types, and the importance of determining the formation of the relationship between parents and children. The second part puts forward the reference factors of the relationship between stepparents and stepchildren, which focus on four reference factors: (1) whether to live together; (2) whether the stepparents need to bear part or most of the maintenance costs of the stepchildren; (3) whether the stepchildren need to be raised for a certain period of time; (4) whether the two parties need to have subjective intention to form a dependency relationship; and so on. The third part introduces and compares the foreign legislation examples about the relationship between stepparents and children, and introduces the legislative experience of other countries, such as Canada's "actual parents" standards and related provisions; Swiss law relays the basic rules and comments on the relationship between parents and children, and so on. The fourth part is about the status quo of stepparent and child relationship and the suggestion of legislation perfection. Firstly, it introduces the current situation of our country's legislation in this respect and evaluates it. Then put forward from two aspects to improve the proposal: (1) to form the relationship between stepparents and children in the form of law; (2) the criteria for the determination of the formation of the factual dependency relationship. The determination criteria should meet three conditions at the same time and meet the conditions. We should consider that the stepparents and stepchildren have formed a dependency relationship under this condition, and that they have the right and obligation relationship. It has been transformed into a legal relationship of rights and obligations between parents and children. There are three conditions: stepparents and stepchildren live together, stepparents should have a certain number of years of education for stepchildren, and both sides have the subjective intention of forming a dependency relationship.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.9
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 吳國平;;試論我國收養(yǎng)立法的完善問題[J];安陽師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2007年01期
2 陳翠銀;對我國收養(yǎng)法若干問題的思考[J];法律適用;1995年09期
3 何政泉;完善我國親屬扶養(yǎng)制度的幾點思考[J];涪陵師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2004年02期
4 姚建龍;;國家親權(quán)理論與少年司法——以美國少年司法為中心的研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2008年03期
5 鞠青;美國保護(hù)兒童方面的法律和實踐——概述美國《收養(yǎng)與家庭安全法》[J];青少年犯罪問題;2002年03期
6 吳國平;;特殊收養(yǎng)行為的法律規(guī)制[J];廣西大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2007年04期
7 黃宇;;繼父母收養(yǎng)繼子女若干問題探究——關(guān)于《收養(yǎng)法》第14條未盡之內(nèi)容[J];甘肅政法成人教育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年01期
8 李綱;;論收養(yǎng)法律制度的價值取向[J];甘肅政法成人教育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年01期
9 汪金蘭;從比較法角度看繼父母子女關(guān)系[J];安徽警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年03期
10 李方武;;略論繼父母子女關(guān)系形成與解除過程中的選擇權(quán)[J];經(jīng)濟研究導(dǎo)刊;2009年14期
，本文編號：2360288
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/hyflw/2360288.html
