【摘要】： 一男一女要排他的自愿結(jié)合，除了必須具備法律規(guī)定的結(jié)婚實(shí)質(zhì)要件以外，還必須按照法律規(guī)定的程序結(jié)婚，以獲取法律上的正式婚姻，這個(gè)程序就是所謂的婚姻成立的形式要件，也正是本文所要研究的對(duì)象。本文從婚姻成立以及結(jié)婚形式要件的有關(guān)基本理論入手，然后對(duì)不同國(guó)家的結(jié)婚形式要件進(jìn)行比較分析，再對(duì)我國(guó)的結(jié)婚形式要件進(jìn)行歷史審視，從而找出我國(guó)單采一元登記婚制度的不合理之處，對(duì)儀式婚制度的可采性進(jìn)行分析，建議進(jìn)行形式婚姻的二元建構(gòu)。 全文共五個(gè)部分： 第一部分：婚姻成立的基礎(chǔ)理論。本部分先對(duì)婚姻成立的概念及其特征進(jìn)行論述，然后再對(duì)婚姻成立與相關(guān)概念進(jìn)行比較，區(qū)分了婚姻的成立與生效，婚姻的成立只是一個(gè)事實(shí)問(wèn)題，，而婚姻的生效則是已經(jīng)成立的婚姻因符合法定的有效要件而取得法律認(rèn)可的效力，它是一個(gè)價(jià)值判斷問(wèn)題。最后論述了婚姻成立的要件及其法律后果，其中重點(diǎn)強(qiáng)調(diào)了婚姻的成立在形式上只要具有社會(huì)公示性，使不特定的第三人可以獲悉男女雙方的婚姻狀況既可。 第二部分：結(jié)婚形式要件。本部分首先論述了結(jié)婚形式要件與婚姻制度的關(guān)系，指出正是婚姻制度的存在造就了形式婚主義與事實(shí)婚主義這兩種立法主義。然后論述了結(jié)婚形式要件的涵義及其功能，指出結(jié)婚實(shí)質(zhì)要件的具備，只是使婚姻的成立產(chǎn)生了可能性，而要使可能性轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)楝F(xiàn)實(shí)性，還必須履行一定的法定程序，這種程序方面的要件就是結(jié)婚的形式要件，它是婚姻取得社會(huì)承認(rèn)的方式，具有非常重要的公示、公信性。一般情況下，符合結(jié)婚實(shí)質(zhì)要件的當(dāng)事人，只有履行法定的結(jié)婚程序，其婚姻關(guān)系才被國(guó)家和社會(huì)承認(rèn)，發(fā)生相應(yīng)的法律效力。 第三部分：結(jié)婚形式要件的比較法研究。本部分對(duì)各國(guó)的結(jié)婚形式要件進(jìn)行了宏觀考察和微觀分析，并從中得出啟迪：我們也應(yīng)該在結(jié)婚形式要件上更加注重對(duì)婚姻當(dāng)事人個(gè)體的尊重和重視，盡量使婚姻當(dāng)事人有更大的婚姻自主權(quán)。 第四部分：對(duì)我國(guó)結(jié)婚形式要件的歷史審視。本部分首先對(duì)我國(guó)古代的結(jié)婚形式進(jìn)行了回顧，再論述我國(guó)近代結(jié)婚形式要件的立法規(guī)定，從而引出結(jié)婚形式與婚姻習(xí)俗有著緊密的聯(lián)系，從某種程度上說(shuō)，結(jié)婚形式是根植于婚姻習(xí)俗的，婚姻習(xí)俗的這種隱性約束力，使我們不得不重新看待和思考我國(guó)的一元登記婚制度。 第五部分：對(duì)我國(guó)結(jié)婚形式要件的反思。本部分首先對(duì)我國(guó)采取一元登記婚制度的不合理之處進(jìn)行分述，一元登記婚制度不僅存在其固有的局限性，而且與我國(guó)的傳統(tǒng)習(xí)慣和現(xiàn)實(shí)生活皆有沖突；然后分別論述了承認(rèn)儀式婚的現(xiàn)實(shí)性、必要性和可行性；最后建議我國(guó)應(yīng)當(dāng)進(jìn)行形式婚姻的二元制構(gòu)建，提出我們應(yīng)當(dāng)正確評(píng)價(jià)傳統(tǒng)的婚姻儀式，法律應(yīng)采取寬容的姿態(tài)，在立法層面上進(jìn)行一種溝通，溝通的結(jié)果是在制定法中進(jìn)行形式婚姻的二元建構(gòu)與并存，采取登記制與儀式制并采的方式，尊重當(dāng)事人的選擇，以解決現(xiàn)有的矛盾。
[Abstract]:A man and a woman who want exclusive voluntary union must not only have the essential elements of marriage stipulated by law, but also must marry according to the procedure stipulated by law in order to obtain the formal marriage in law. This procedure is the so-called formal elements of marriage establishment, which is also the object of this paper. Starting with the basic theory of formal requirements, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the formal requirements of marriage in different countries, and then makes a historical review of the formal requirements of marriage in China, so as to find out the unreasonable aspects of the system of univariate registration of marriage in China, analyze the acceptability of the system of ritual marriage, and propose the dual construction of formal marriage.
The full text consists of five parts.
The first part is the basic theory of the establishment of marriage. This part first discusses the concept and characteristics of the establishment of marriage, and then compares the establishment of marriage with the relevant concepts to distinguish the establishment and validity of marriage. The establishment of marriage is only a matter of fact, and the validity of marriage is the validity of the established marriage. It is a question of value judgment to obtain the validity of legal acceptance by means of important conditions. Finally, it discusses the essential elements and legal consequences of the establishment of a marriage, which emphasizes that the establishment of a marriage can be made known to an unspecified third party as long as it is formally public.
The second part: the marriage form important document. This part first elaborated the marriage form important document and the marriage system relations, pointed out is precisely the marriage system existence has created the formalism and the fact marriage doctrine these two kinds of legislations. The establishment of marriage has created the possibility, but in order to make the possibility into reality, we must also fulfill certain legal procedures. The procedural requirements are the formal requirements of marriage. It is a way of obtaining social recognition of marriage, with very important publicity and credibility. To fulfill the statutory marriage procedure, its marital relationship is recognized by the state and society and has corresponding legal effect.
The third part is the comparative law study of the marriage form requirements.This part makes a Macro-investigation and micro-analysis of the marriage form requirements of various countries and draws inspiration from it.We should also pay more attention to the respect and attention to the individual marriage parties in the marriage form requirements, so as to make the marriage parties have greater autonomy in marriage.
Part IV: A historical review of the elements of the form of marriage in China. This part first reviews the forms of marriage in ancient China, and then discusses the legislative provisions of the elements of the form of marriage in modern China, which leads to a close relationship between the form of marriage and marriage customs. To some extent, the form of marriage is rooted in marriage customs. The implicit binding force of marriage custom makes us have to re-consider and reconsider our unitary marriage registration system.
Part V: Reflections on the requirements of the form of marriage in China. Firstly, this part discusses the unreasonableness of the unitary marriage registration system in China. The unitary marriage registration system not only has its inherent limitations, but also conflicts with the traditional customs and real life of our country. Necessity and feasibility; Finally, it is suggested that China should construct the dual system of formal marriage, and put forward that we should correctly evaluate the traditional marriage ceremony, the law should adopt a tolerant attitude, and conduct a communication at the legislative level. The result of the communication is the dual construction and coexistence of formal marriage in the enactment law, the registration system and the registration system. The way of ritual system is adopted, respecting the choice of the parties, so as to solve the existing contradictions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2007
【分類號(hào)】：D913.9

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 楊琬一;;淺議“借殼婚姻”[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年17期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前7條

1 顏領(lǐng)章;婚姻登記若干法律問(wèn)題研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2010年

2 杜洪碩;結(jié)婚登記瑕疵及其立法完善[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

3 姚洪濤;婚姻登記制度研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2011年

4 張海;論使用虛假信息登記結(jié)婚的認(rèn)定和處理[D];西南政法大學(xué);2011年

5 姜航;論婚姻登記瑕疵問(wèn)題[D];華東政法大學(xué);2009年

6 張慧芳;瑕疵婚姻制度研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2010年

7 朱天娣;婚姻登記瑕疵問(wèn)題的法律探析[D];鄭州大學(xué);2013年

本文編號(hào)：2234904