發(fā)布時間：2018-07-10 11:31

  本文選題：家事案件 + 法院證據(jù)調(diào)查�。� 參考：《廣西師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著經(jīng)濟社會的快速發(fā)展,傳統(tǒng)的婚姻家庭觀念不斷改變,涉及人身關(guān)系以及家庭財產(chǎn)的家事案件的數(shù)量越來越多,案件情況也越來越復(fù)雜,而且家庭財產(chǎn)的范圍也逐步擴大,不僅包括傳統(tǒng)意義上的有形資產(chǎn),如金錢、房產(chǎn)、土地、債務(wù),還包括無形資產(chǎn),如股票、公司股權(quán)、債券等。實踐中,由于家事案件證據(jù)具有隱秘性和難收集等特點,加之很多家事案件的一方當(dāng)事人訴訟能力弱,對如何收集證據(jù)維護自己的合法權(quán)益沒有明確的概念,如果仍然繼續(xù)采用審理財產(chǎn)糾紛案件的方法審理家事糾紛案件,僅僅依靠當(dāng)事人所提供的證據(jù),不挖掘和發(fā)現(xiàn)家事糾紛背后隱藏的真正問題,法官就難以完全了解案件的全貌,也就難以做出準(zhǔn)確的判決,這樣容易造成案件審結(jié)后社會效果不佳,嚴(yán)重的可能會進而影響社會的和諧與穩(wěn)定。普通民事案件主要依靠當(dāng)事人的證據(jù)收集方式無法適應(yīng)家事案件復(fù)雜性和特殊性的需要,因此在家事案件的審理提倡法院依職權(quán)調(diào)查取證,主動探知案件真實,從而作出準(zhǔn)確的判決,維護社會弱勢群體的利益,進而有利于維護社會穩(wěn)定。然而目前我國沒有單獨的家事訴訟程序,也沒有建立專門的家事案件證據(jù)制度,因此本文將焦點集中在法院家事證據(jù)調(diào)查上,在分析家事案件中法院證據(jù)調(diào)查制度的必要性的基礎(chǔ)上,借鑒其他國家和地區(qū)的經(jīng)驗,再結(jié)合我國家事審判改革試點法院的實踐經(jīng)驗,從法律制度、經(jīng)濟成本、社會資源、操作技術(shù)四個方面對在改革中法院證據(jù)調(diào)查方面遇到的問題進行具體分析,并對我國法院家事證據(jù)調(diào)查制度的完善提出了自己的建議,以期對我國構(gòu)建專門的家事案件證據(jù)制度盡一份綿薄之力。本文共分引言、正文和結(jié)論三部分,正文主要分為五章,主要內(nèi)容是:第一章,法院家事證據(jù)調(diào)查制度概述。筆者在這部分首先對法院家事證據(jù)調(diào)查制度的概念、特征及意義進行簡要的介紹,進而對法院家事證據(jù)調(diào)查制度的可行性和必要性進行分析論述。第二章,家事證據(jù)制度的域外考察。鑒于大陸法系中德國、日本以及英美法系中的英國、美國在家事訴訟制度上都較為成熟,因此筆者主要對這些國家進行研究。德國有著獨立的家事審判程序,法院在家事糾紛案件中可以依職權(quán)進行一系列的訴訟活動;日本的家事調(diào)查官制度為日本的家庭裁判所處理家事案件和少年案件提供極大的支撐;英國司法系統(tǒng)與社會支持系統(tǒng)相結(jié)合;美國家庭法院分類受理家庭案件,可以以個案作業(yè)非正式的方式處理。這些國家的制度都可以為我國的家事證據(jù)調(diào)查制度的構(gòu)建提供一些借鑒。第三章,我國法院家事證據(jù)調(diào)查制度的現(xiàn)狀。這部分主要從立法現(xiàn)狀和實證考察兩方面來闡述。由于我國目前家事審判改革尚處于起步階段,因此我國對家事證據(jù)調(diào)查沒有專門的法律規(guī)定,都是依托于民事訴訟法及其司法解釋等法律基礎(chǔ)之上。筆者在對法院家事證據(jù)調(diào)查制度立法現(xiàn)狀進行闡述之后,將重點放在對法院家事證據(jù)調(diào)查制度的實證考察上。這部分內(nèi)容,筆者主要從法院在實踐中證據(jù)調(diào)查所適用的原則以及新引入的輔助制度兩方面來論述我國目前家事審判試點法院在審判實踐中的證據(jù)調(diào)查制度的具體操作情況以及所取得的成效。第四章,我國家事證據(jù)調(diào)查制度的困境。由于該項制度尚在探索之中,因此各地的試點法院在實踐過程中均遇到了不同程度的困難和問題。筆者將從法律制度、經(jīng)濟成本、社會資源、操作技術(shù)四個方面進一步分析當(dāng)前在法院家事證據(jù)調(diào)查取證制度所面臨的困境。第五章,對完善我國法院家事證據(jù)調(diào)查制度的建議。筆者結(jié)合目前法院在家事案件中進行證據(jù)調(diào)查的實證考察,以及法院在家事證據(jù)調(diào)查上存在的困難,認(rèn)為可以通過進一步完善相應(yīng)的法律法規(guī)及配套制度,加大對法院家事案件調(diào)查取證的經(jīng)費支持,加強與各部門、相關(guān)單位的長效協(xié)作機制以及完善法院家事案件調(diào)查取證的程序細(xì)節(jié)這些方面來完善法院家事證據(jù)調(diào)查制度。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of the economy and society, the traditional concept of marriage and family is constantly changing, the number of cases involving personal relations and family property is increasing, and the cases are becoming more and more complex, and the scope of family property is gradually expanding, including not only the tangible assets in the traditional sense, such as money, property, land and debt, but also the traditional sense of property. It includes intangible assets, such as stock, stock, bond and so on. In practice, because the evidence of the family case is hidden and difficult to collect, and the ability of one party in many family cases is weak, there is no clear concept on how to collect evidence to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests, and if still continue to adopt the case of hearing property disputes. To hear the case of family disputes, only relying on the evidence provided by the parties and not excavating and discovering the real problems hidden behind the family disputes, the judge will be difficult to fully understand the full picture of the case, and it is difficult to make an accurate judgment. This will easily cause a bad result of the association after the case, which may seriously affect the society. The common civil cases mainly rely on the evidence collection method of the parties, which can not adapt to the needs of the complexity and particularity of the family case. Therefore, in the case of family affairs, it advocates the court to investigate and obtain evidence in accordance with the authority of the court and actively explore the truth of the case, thus making an accurate decision and maintaining the interests of the social vulnerable groups, and thus beneficial to the interests of the social disadvantaged groups. In order to maintain social stability, however, there is no separate family litigation procedure and no special family case evidence system, so the focus of this paper is on the investigation of the evidence of the court, on the basis of the analysis of the necessity of the court evidence investigation system in the case of family affairs, and the experience of other countries and regions. In accordance with the practical experience of the trial court of the reform of home affairs trial in China, this paper makes a specific analysis of the problems encountered in the court of evidence investigation in the reform from four aspects of the legal system, economic cost, social resources and operation technology, and puts forward some suggestions for the improvement of the domestic court evidence investigation system in our country, with a view to establishing a special construction of our country. This article is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion, the main body of the text is divided into five chapters. The main content is: the first chapter, the summary of the court family evidence investigation system. In this part, the author first briefly introduces the concept, characteristics and significance of the court family evidence investigation system, and then to the law. The feasibility and necessity of the family evidence investigation system is analyzed. The second chapter, the extraterritorial investigation of the family evidence system. In view of the German, Japanese and British and American legal systems in the continental law system, the United States is more mature in the family procedure system, so the author mainly studies these countries. Germany has an independent family affairs. The trial procedure, the court can carry out a series of litigation activities in the case of family disputes; the Japanese family affairs investigation officer system provides a great support for the family cases and juvenile cases handled by the Japanese family referees; the British judicial system is combined with the social support system; the family court of the United States accepts family cases in classification. The system of the case work is handled informally. The system of these countries can provide some reference for the construction of domestic evidence investigation system in China. The third chapter, the status of the domestic court evidence investigation system in our country. This part is mainly from the two aspects of the legislative situation and the empirical investigation. In the initial stage, there is no special legal provisions on the investigation of family evidence in China, which are based on the legal basis of the civil procedure law and its judicial interpretation. The author will focus on the empirical investigation of the court evidence investigation system after the present state of legislation of the court evidence investigation system. The author mainly discusses the specific operation situation and achievements of the evidence investigation system in the trial practice of domestic trial court from two aspects of the application of the evidence investigation in the practice of the court and the newly introduced auxiliary system. The fourth chapter, the plight of the system of domestic evidence investigation in China. The degree is still in the exploration, so the pilot courts all over the country have encountered different difficulties and problems in the process of practice. The author will further analyze the difficulties faced by the legal system, the economic cost, the social resources, and the operation technology in four aspects. The fifth chapter is to perfect the home court of our country. On the basis of the empirical investigation of the evidence investigation in the family cases and the difficulties of the court in the investigation of family evidence, the author believes that the financial support for the investigation and evidence of the court case can be strengthened by further perfecting the relevant laws and regulations and supporting system, and it is strengthened with the various ministries. The door, the long-term coordination mechanism of relevant units, and the procedure details of improving the court's family cases investigation and evidence collection to improve the family court evidence investigation system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923.9

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 崔巍嵐,王有才;追查證據(jù)“保管鏈”質(zhì)疑證據(jù)之效力[J];河北法學(xué);2000年05期

2 馬德鴻;略論法官庭外證據(jù)調(diào)查權(quán)[J];甘肅政法成人教育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2001年03期

3 裴國智;試析法學(xué)證據(jù)[J];武漢公安干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年03期

4 王晶,張弘;從功能視角看證據(jù)的屬性[J];人民檢察;2005年21期

5 孫曉紅;;對證據(jù)調(diào)查變革的認(rèn)識[J];河南公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報;2007年04期

6 李長城;;論刑事二審的證據(jù)調(diào)查[J];法學(xué)論壇;2011年04期

7 黃園;;對證據(jù)概念及特征的再認(rèn)識[J];商業(yè)文化(下半月);2011年12期

8 何家弘;;關(guān)于創(chuàng)建“證據(jù)調(diào)查學(xué)”的構(gòu)想[J];法學(xué)家;1996年06期

9 何家弘;證據(jù)調(diào)查方法探源(續(xù))[J];中央檢察官管理學(xué)院學(xué)報;1997年02期

10 王若陽;析證據(jù)調(diào)查中常見的錯誤[J];北京警院學(xué)報;1997年01期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條

1 姚勇;建立證據(jù)調(diào)查令制度初探[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟報;2003年

2 程雷;用制度保障采納無罪與罪輕證據(jù)[N];法制日報;2005年

3 山東省聊城市中級人民法院 鄭萬宏　李玉萍 關(guān)淼;專門調(diào)查體現(xiàn)審判職責(zé)[N];人民法院報;2009年

4 中國青年政治學(xué)院法律系副主任 孫遠;從薄熙來案看證據(jù)問題[N];檢察日報;2013年

5 張吉喜;德國刑事訴訟中的證據(jù)禁止[N];人民法院報;2005年

6 陳建平;安寧人依靠證據(jù)“打官司”[N];云南日報;2003年

7 齊樹潔;證據(jù)制度的改革任重而道遠[N];人民法院報;2003年

8 鄭萬宏　李玉萍 關(guān)淼;從司法鑒定到證據(jù)調(diào)查[N];人民法院報;2009年

9 武漢大學(xué)法學(xué)院教授、博士生導(dǎo)師 江國華;通過證據(jù)法則的司法人權(quán)保障[N];人民法院報;2011年

10 崔欣;我國民事訴訟中建立調(diào)查令制度之設(shè)想[N];江蘇法制報;2006年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 康丹;南海島礁主權(quán)歸屬證據(jù)研究初論[D];武漢大學(xué);2013年

2 陳驚天;法官證據(jù)評判研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2009年

3 孫義剛;證據(jù)契約研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2008年

4 金玄默;論證據(jù)裁判主義[D];中國政法大學(xué);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 黃穎婷;論刑事訴訟中的“情況說明”[D];西南大學(xué);2015年

2 王巖;論啟動刑事再審之新證據(jù)[D];中國青年政治學(xué)院;2014年

3 陳i吪，

本文編號：2113254