本文選題：房屋按揭 + 物權(quán)變動��； 參考：《上海交通大學(xué)》2008年碩士論文

【摘要】： 隨著現(xiàn)代社會的發(fā)展和消費觀念的轉(zhuǎn)變,按揭購房已經(jīng)成為普通民眾解決住房問題的主流方式,而對于按揭房屋的處理就不可避免地成為了離婚糾紛中的熱點。但是這一熱點目前面臨立法的粗疏與理念的沖突,使得對于按揭房屋在離婚糾紛中的處理已逐漸成為了困擾司法實踐的難題。因此,本文對于涉及按揭房屋在離婚糾紛中的處理的法律問題的研究具有重要的現(xiàn)實價值。 因我國現(xiàn)行《婚姻法》實行的是婚后所得共同制的法定財產(chǎn)制和約定財產(chǎn)制相結(jié)合的夫妻財產(chǎn)制度,考慮到約定財產(chǎn)制下按揭房屋的定性和處理相對比較容易,且司法實踐中的問題絕大多數(shù)發(fā)生在法定財產(chǎn)制場合,故本文的探討僅限于法定財產(chǎn)制的背景下。本文除引言、結(jié)語外,共有四章,文章較全面系統(tǒng)地研究了夫妻財產(chǎn)中以按揭方式購買的房屋的分割問題。 第一章以一個案例引出離婚糾紛中對按揭房屋的處理所出現(xiàn)的問題。對于按揭房屋在離婚案件中的處理,目前在實踐中,存在著大量的司法性指導(dǎo)意見,直接影響到按揭房屋本身以及房屋增值部分的定性和處理,這也正是按揭房屋在離婚糾紛處理中的難點所在,主要包括涉及的法律制度的沖突、按揭房屋的定性與處理、房屋增值部分的定性與處理三個方面。 第二章討論了房屋按揭涉及的法律關(guān)系。按揭房屋的處理之所以會成為離婚財產(chǎn)分割時的難點所在,最主要是由按揭制度本身的復(fù)雜性所決定的,厘清按揭制度下的各種法律關(guān)系,是解決按揭房屋分割和歸屬問題的前提。主要介紹了按揭的定義、房屋按揭的法律性質(zhì)、房屋按揭的物權(quán)變動法律關(guān)系、房屋增值部分的法律性質(zhì)四個層面的相關(guān)理論。 第三章圍繞著按揭房屋在離婚糾紛處理中的幾個熱點問題,介紹了國內(nèi)外夫妻財產(chǎn)分割制度中與按揭房屋相關(guān)的理論與實踐經(jīng)驗。第一節(jié)重點關(guān)注了英美法系國家有關(guān)財產(chǎn)性質(zhì)轉(zhuǎn)化的理論以及有關(guān)個人財產(chǎn)增值的理論;第二節(jié)主要就現(xiàn)行相關(guān)法律的規(guī)定和學(xué)術(shù)界的觀點作了比較分析。 第四章在對前文的理論、觀點分析研究的基礎(chǔ)上,將離婚案件中的按揭房屋分為已經(jīng)取得所有權(quán)和尚未取得所有權(quán)兩大類,來探討適合我國國情的處理方式,以期對我國的司法實踐有所裨益。
[Abstract]:With the development of modern society and the change of consumption concept, mortgage purchase has become the mainstream way for ordinary people to solve the housing problem, and the settlement of mortgage housing has inevitably become a hot spot in divorce disputes. However, this hot spot now faces the conflict between legislation and ideas, which makes the settlement of mortgage house in divorce dispute gradually become a difficult problem puzzling judicial practice. Therefore, this paper has important practical value for the study of legal issues concerning the settlement of mortgage housing in divorce disputes. Because the current Marriage Law of our country implements the matrimonial property system which combines the legal property system with the contractual property system, it is relatively easy to define and deal with the mortgage house under the contract property system. Most of the problems in judicial practice occur in the situation of legal property system, so the discussion in this paper is limited to the background of legal property system. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, there are four chapters in this paper. The first chapter introduces the problems of mortgage housing in divorce dispute. At present, there are a large number of judicial guidance opinions on the treatment of mortgage housing in divorce cases, which directly affect the nature and treatment of the mortgage housing itself and the value added part of the housing. This is also the difficult point of mortgage housing in the settlement of divorce disputes, including the conflict of legal system involved, the nature and treatment of mortgage housing, and the qualitative and processing of the value-added part of housing. The second chapter discusses the legal relationship of housing mortgage. The reason why the handling of mortgage housing has become a difficulty in the division of divorced property is mainly determined by the complexity of the mortgage system itself. It clarifies the various legal relationships under the mortgage system. Is to solve the mortgage housing division and ownership of the premise. This paper mainly introduces the definition of mortgage, the legal nature of housing mortgage, the legal relationship of real right change of house mortgage, and the related theory of legal nature of housing value-added part. The third chapter focuses on several hot issues of mortgage housing in the settlement of divorce disputes, and introduces the theoretical and practical experience of the domestic and foreign husband and wife property division system related to mortgage housing. The first section focuses on the theory of property nature transformation and the theory of personal property appreciation in Anglo-American law system countries. The second section mainly makes a comparative analysis on the provisions of current relevant laws and the views of academic circles. The fourth chapter, on the basis of the theory and viewpoint analysis, divides the mortgage house in the divorce case into two categories: the acquired ownership and the unacquired ownership, in order to discuss how to deal with the situation of our country. In order to benefit the judicial practice of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類號】：D923.9

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前9條

1 朱柳霞;離婚時按揭房的歸屬及分割問題研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2010年

2 李子涓;論離婚糾紛中按揭房屋的處理[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

3 陳鷗;論離婚時個人婚前按揭房屋的處理[D];蘭州大學(xué);2011年

4 楊帆;離婚糾紛中按揭房屋的歸屬與分割[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年

5 賈肖虎;論離婚時婚前按揭房屋的歸屬與分割[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年

6 張引;論離婚時按揭房屋及增值部分的歸屬與分割[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

7 王麗;論離婚訴訟中按揭房屋的性質(zhì)認(rèn)定與分割[D];中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院;2012年

8 劉立嬌;離婚時婚前按揭房的權(quán)屬及補(bǔ)償問題研究[D];天津師范大學(xué);2012年

9 劉金露;離婚房產(chǎn)分割問題研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：2084620