介入婚姻關(guān)系“第三者”侵權(quán)責任研究
發(fā)布時間:2018-05-11 08:02
本文選題:婚姻 + 第三者。 參考:《河北大學》2015年碩士論文
【摘要】:夫妻相互忠實是婚姻關(guān)系中的基本義務,也是婚姻法中的基本精神。近年來“第三者”插足他人婚姻的現(xiàn)象呈現(xiàn)蔓延趨勢,不僅影響了婚姻家庭的穩(wěn)定和后代子女的健康成長,也嚴重影響了社會風氣,損害公序良俗原則,并有部分演變成嚴重的惡性刑事案件,嚴重影響著社會的安寧與穩(wěn)定!暗谌摺被谥饔^過錯介入他人合法婚姻,侵犯他人婚姻家庭關(guān)系,給受害人造成身心損害,就法律調(diào)整角度而言,第三者介入婚姻關(guān)系后之所以需要承擔侵權(quán)責任,與法律和道德的關(guān)系、法律本身的作用以及第三者侵害婚姻關(guān)系本身的權(quán)利義務特點密切相關(guān)。這些都構(gòu)成了承擔侵權(quán)責任的理論依據(jù);就法律原則而言,介入婚姻關(guān)系“第三者”的行為違反了我國婚姻法規(guī)定的夫妻互相忠實、互相扶助的原則,違背了我國公序良俗、他人合法權(quán)益不得侵害的民事制度;從法律理論來看,介入婚姻關(guān)系“第三者”侵權(quán)行為完全符合一般侵權(quán)行為的行為違法性、損害事實、因果關(guān)系、主觀過錯四大構(gòu)成要件,且在行為的實施過程中,介入婚姻關(guān)系“第三者”與婚姻過錯方的同一行為又構(gòu)成對婚姻無過錯方的共同侵權(quán),且體現(xiàn)了一定特殊性,即主體特定性、過錯的共同性、損害后果統(tǒng)一性和因果關(guān)系的唯一性,明顯屬于共同侵權(quán)行為,理應承擔共同侵權(quán)責任。綜觀我國現(xiàn)行法律規(guī)定,雖規(guī)定了夫妻互相忠實義務,但并沒有賦予婚姻一方明確的配偶權(quán);雖規(guī)定了婚姻無過錯方的離婚損害賠償制度,對婚姻無過錯方的其合法權(quán)益進行了一定的保護,但這些不僅沒有具體權(quán)利義務規(guī)定,還限定訴請賠償以離婚為條件,侵權(quán)責任的承擔請求具有極大的局限性,即忽視了婚姻內(nèi)部關(guān)系的保護,也忽視了婚姻外部關(guān)系的調(diào)整。面對當前民事法律存在不完善的問題,筆者預通過對其行為的構(gòu)成進行基礎理論論證,以期對我國婚姻家庭健康發(fā)展及民事法律的完善提供幫助。
[Abstract]:Mutual loyalty between husband and wife is the basic obligation of marriage and the basic spirit of marriage law. In recent years, the phenomenon of "third party" taking part in the marriage of others has shown a spreading trend, which not only affects the stability of marriage and family and the healthy growth of children, but also seriously affects the social atmosphere and damages the principle of good public order and good customs. Some of them have developed into serious criminal cases, which seriously affect the peace and stability of the society. The third party is involved in the legal marriage of other people on the basis of subjective fault, encroaches upon the marriage and family relationship of other people, and causes physical and mental damage to the victim. From the angle of legal adjustment, the third party should bear the tort liability after intervening in the marriage relationship. It is closely related to the relationship between law and morality, the function of the law itself and the rights and obligations of the third party against the marriage relationship itself. All these constitute the theoretical basis for assuming tort liability; as far as legal principles are concerned, the act of intervening in a "third party" in a marriage relationship violates the principle of mutual loyalty and mutual assistance between husband and wife as stipulated in China's Marriage Law, and violates the public order and good customs of our country. The civil system in which the lawful rights and interests of others cannot be infringed upon; from the point of view of legal theory, the infringing act of intervening in the "third party" of the marriage relationship is completely in line with the four constitutive requirements of the general tort, such as illegality, damage to facts, causality, subjective fault, etc. In the course of the implementation of the act, the same behavior of the third party and the fault party in marriage constitutes the joint infringement of the non-fault party in the marriage, which embodies the particularity of the subject and the commonality of the fault. The unity of damage consequences and the uniqueness of causality obviously belong to joint tort and should bear joint tort liability. Looking at the current laws and regulations of our country, although it stipulates the obligation of mutual loyalty between husband and wife, it does not give one of the parties to the marriage a clear right to spouse; although it stipulates the system of compensation for divorce damages of the party without fault in the marriage, The legitimate rights and interests of the party without fault in marriage are protected to a certain extent, but these not only have no specific rights and obligations, but also limit the claim for compensation under the condition of divorce, so the claim for tort liability has great limitations. Not only ignore the protection of the internal relationship of marriage, but also ignore the adjustment of the external relationship of marriage. In the face of the existing problems of imperfect civil law, the author makes a theoretical demonstration on the constitution of his behavior in order to provide help for the healthy development of marriage and family and the perfection of civil law in our country.
【學位授予單位】:河北大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2015
【分類號】:D923.9
,
本文編號:1873112
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/hyflw/1873112.html