本文選題：爭(zhēng)議 + 可仲裁性��； 參考：《中國政法大學(xué)》2008年碩士論文

【摘要】： 仲裁作為當(dāng)今世界各國解決國際商事爭(zhēng)議的一項(xiàng)主要的替代性爭(zhēng)議解決機(jī)制,在與訴訟制度相輔相成的發(fā)展過程中,可仲裁性的擴(kuò)張對(duì)仲裁制度的發(fā)展壯大起到了主要的推動(dòng)作用。在仲裁研究中,可仲裁性問題無論在理論上還是實(shí)踐中都具有基礎(chǔ)性的地位,并成為仲裁立法和學(xué)術(shù)著作中不可或缺的內(nèi)容。特別是近年來,隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展,新類型的商事糾紛不斷涌現(xiàn),仲裁在特定的爭(zhēng)議領(lǐng)域面臨現(xiàn)行立法規(guī)制之外的尷尬。目前,在各國積極推動(dòng)和支持仲裁發(fā)展的大背景下,我國需要一個(gè)什么樣的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)來確立仲裁的范圍,并使之適用于我國仲裁實(shí)踐,成為擺在我們面前一個(gè)亟待解決的問題。 本文從爭(zhēng)議可仲裁性的基礎(chǔ)理論問題入手,在借鑒各國立法經(jīng)驗(yàn)的基礎(chǔ)上,充分考慮了新的國際經(jīng)濟(jì)形勢(shì)對(duì)可仲裁性判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的影響,在理論層面總結(jié)出制約可仲裁性判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的內(nèi)外部因素,確立了全新的可仲裁性的判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn),并將這一標(biāo)準(zhǔn)應(yīng)用于具體爭(zhēng)議領(lǐng)域的分析,最終結(jié)合我國立法與實(shí)踐現(xiàn)狀,提出了自己的建議。 全文共分五章: 第一章,全面闡述了爭(zhēng)議可仲裁性的基礎(chǔ)理論,在對(duì)爭(zhēng)議可仲裁性定義的基礎(chǔ)上,通過與相關(guān)概念的辨析,厘清了這一概念的內(nèi)涵外延。介紹了爭(zhēng)議可仲裁性的四個(gè)特征,提出了研究這一問題的微觀及宏觀意義。 第二章,闡述了確立爭(zhēng)議可仲裁性的理論依據(jù)。本章主要是對(duì)現(xiàn)有仲裁立法和實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)進(jìn)行總結(jié),同時(shí)考慮到制度本身的發(fā)展趨勢(shì)及這種趨勢(shì)帶來的影響,在理論層面概括總結(jié)出影響標(biāo)準(zhǔn)建立的仲裁性質(zhì)、制度限制兩個(gè)內(nèi)部因素,及國家限制和經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)發(fā)展需要的外部因素,從而為構(gòu)建一種開放而不失精準(zhǔn)的規(guī)則做好準(zhǔn)備。 第三章,在依據(jù)理論總結(jié)的基礎(chǔ)上,從主體法律地位平等、所涉實(shí)體權(quán)益當(dāng)事人有權(quán)自由處分、爭(zhēng)議具有可訴性和不影響公共利益四個(gè)方面提出有助仲裁發(fā)展的可仲裁性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。 第四章,對(duì)建立的可仲裁性判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行了實(shí)證研究,逐一分析了證券、反壟斷、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)及破產(chǎn)四個(gè)新興領(lǐng)域的爭(zhēng)議類型及特點(diǎn),用所建立的爭(zhēng)議可仲裁性判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)對(duì)這些爭(zhēng)議進(jìn)行了一般性研究和驗(yàn)證,得出了適用仲裁的結(jié)論。 第五章,立足我國,分析此問題的立法與實(shí)踐現(xiàn)狀,結(jié)合國情,對(duì)我國反壟斷爭(zhēng)議、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)爭(zhēng)議、證券爭(zhēng)議和家庭法上的兩種特殊爭(zhēng)議能否引入仲裁及如何適用可仲裁性判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行了探討。
[Abstract]:Arbitration, as a major alternative dispute resolution mechanism for solving international commercial disputes in the world today, has played a major role in promoting the development and expansion of the arbitration system in the process of complementary development with the litigation system. In the study of arbitration, the question of arbitrability is both in theory and in practice. Both of them have a basic position and become an indispensable part of the arbitration legislation and academic works. Especially in recent years, with the development of the economy, new types of commercial disputes emerge constantly. Arbitration is facing the embarrassment of the current legislative regulation in the particular field of dispute. At present, the great back of the development of arbitration is actively promoted and supported in various countries. Under the view, what kind of standard is needed to establish the scope of arbitration and to apply it to the practice of arbitration in our country, which has become a problem to be solved in front of us.
This paper, starting with the basic theory of arbitrability of disputes, takes full consideration of the influence of the new international economic situation on the standard of arbitrable judgment on the basis of the experience of various countries, and summarizes the internal and external factors of the arbitrable judgment standard in the theoretical level. First, the standard is applied to the analysis of specific disputes. Finally, it puts forward some suggestions based on the current situation of legislation and practice in China.
The full text is divided into five chapters.
In the first chapter, the basic theory of dispute arbitrability is fully expounded. On the basis of the definition of the arbitrability of the dispute, the connotation and extension of the concept is clarified through the analysis of the related concepts. The four characteristics of the arbitrability of the dispute are introduced, and the micro and macro significance of the study is put forward.
The second chapter expounds the theoretical basis for establishing the arbitrability of the dispute. This chapter mainly summarizes the existing arbitration legislation and practice experience, and takes into account the development trend of the system itself and the influence brought by this trend. In the theoretical level, it summarizes the arbitration nature of the establishment of the influence standards, the system limits two internal factors, and the country. Family constraints and external factors of economic and social development need to be prepared for building an open and precise rule.
The third chapter, on the basis of the theoretical summary, is equal to the legal status of the subject, the parties involved in the substantive rights and interests have the right to dispose of them freely, and the dispute has the four aspects of litigability and no influence on the public interest, and the arbitration standard is put forward to help the development of arbitration.
The fourth chapter makes an empirical study on the arbitration judgment standard established and analyzes the types and characteristics of the disputes in the four emerging fields of securities, antimonopoly, intellectual property and bankruptcy, and makes general research and verification on these disputes by the arbitration judgement standard established by the dispute, and draws the conclusion of the application of arbitration.
The fifth chapter, based on our country, analyzes the present situation of the legislation and practice of this problem, and combines the national conditions, and discusses whether the two special disputes in China's antitrust dispute, intellectual property dispute, securities dispute and family law can be introduced into arbitration and how to apply the arbitration judgment standard.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類號(hào)】：D925.7

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 鄒林X;;論爭(zhēng)議可仲裁性的概念與性質(zhì)[J];公民與法(法學(xué)版);2011年11期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 劉亞瓊;論民商事爭(zhēng)議的可仲裁性[D];中國政法大學(xué);2011年

2 王應(yīng)春;爭(zhēng)議的可仲裁性研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1860658