本文選題：婚內(nèi)侵權(quán) + 民事責(zé)任��； 參考：《河南師范大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文共分為四部分:一是婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)及其民事責(zé)任制度研究的必要性�；橐鍪且环N世俗化的倫理結(jié)合,婚姻關(guān)系存續(xù)期間產(chǎn)生夫妻之間的侵權(quán)行為甚至更為嚴(yán)重的反社會行為,在所難免。本文所稱婚內(nèi)侵權(quán),是指在婚姻關(guān)系存續(xù)期間發(fā)生在夫妻之間的侵權(quán)行為,可以劃分為兩部分即婚內(nèi)侵害人身權(quán)益和婚內(nèi)侵害財產(chǎn)權(quán)益。反對婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)訴訟的觀點有一定道理,例如,婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)由道德規(guī)范予以調(diào)整以及婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)訴訟不利于家庭和諧等,但都較為片面,難以成立。婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)的法律規(guī)制是我國婚姻法基本原則的體現(xiàn),有利于維護對婚內(nèi)弱勢一方的人身權(quán)益和財產(chǎn)權(quán)益,營造健康、和諧和充滿溫暖的家庭關(guān)系,有利于社會正義的彰顯。二是婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)民事責(zé)任的研究基礎(chǔ)。我國目前婚姻家庭立法并未明確規(guī)定婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)問題,這是婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)案件得不到解決的重要原因。憲法、民法通則、婚姻法、侵權(quán)責(zé)任法等皆不存在受理婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)訴訟的障礙。相關(guān)司法解釋值得反思,司法解釋的制定不僅要合乎法律精神,更應(yīng)當(dāng)與我國國情吻合。英美法系和大陸法系主要國家對婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)都有專門規(guī)定且體系完備�；閮�(nèi)侵權(quán)訴訟制度的建立,既符合我國國情,又有利于保護弱勢群體。三是婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)民事責(zé)任及其立法完善�；閮�(nèi)侵權(quán)民事責(zé)任是指在婚姻關(guān)系存續(xù)期間,夫妻一方因重大過失或故意違法實施侵害或有妨害另一方合法民事權(quán)益的行為并造成另一方人身或財產(chǎn)損害或合法民事權(quán)益受妨害應(yīng)對受害人承擔(dān)的民事責(zé)任。在未來民法典婚姻家庭法編中應(yīng)當(dāng)規(guī)定:在婚姻關(guān)系存續(xù)期間,夫妻一方故意或重大過失以下列方式嚴(yán)重侵害對方人身或財產(chǎn)權(quán)益,應(yīng)當(dāng)依法承擔(dān)相應(yīng)的侵權(quán)責(zé)任,造成配偶嚴(yán)重精神損害的,還應(yīng)當(dāng)承擔(dān)相應(yīng)的損害損害賠償責(zé)任:(一)侵害配偶姓名權(quán)、人身自由權(quán)、身體健康權(quán)、性自主權(quán)、名譽權(quán)、生育權(quán)、隱私權(quán)等人格權(quán)益;(二)不履行同居義務(wù)、不告知有影響生育的生理疾病或性傳染病等疾病歷史的;(三)拒不履行扶養(yǎng)義務(wù)、侵權(quán)配偶一方合法財產(chǎn)權(quán)益的;(四)其他嚴(yán)重侵害配偶合法權(quán)益的行為。同時規(guī)定非常財產(chǎn)制、調(diào)解原則和婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)訴訟時效。四是婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)民事責(zé)任的司法規(guī)則完善。在目前現(xiàn)有的法律和司法解釋規(guī)定的框架里,婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)訴訟并未是一塊禁地。法院在婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)訴訟中應(yīng)當(dāng)堅持調(diào)解原則、釋明規(guī)則和依法合并審理規(guī)則。受害人應(yīng)當(dāng)根據(jù)法律和司法解釋的規(guī)定,主張自己的合法權(quán)益,學(xué)會利用法律捍衛(wèi)自己的尊嚴(yán)。
[Abstract]:This paper is divided into four parts: first, the necessity of the study of marital tort and its civil liability system. Marriage is a kind of secularized ethical combination. It is inevitable to produce even more serious antisocial behavior between husband and wife during the existence of marriage relationship. The term "marital tort" refers to the tort that occurs between husband and wife during the marriage relationship, which can be divided into two parts, I. e., marital infringement of personal rights and interests and marital infringement of property rights and interests. There are some reasons in opposing marital tort litigation, for example, marital tort is adjusted by moral norms and marital tort litigation is not conducive to family harmony, but it is relatively one-sided and difficult to establish. The legal regulation of marital tort is the embodiment of the basic principles of China's marriage law, which is conducive to safeguarding the personal and property rights and interests of the weak party in marriage, creating a healthy, harmonious and warm family relationship, and is conducive to the manifestation of social justice. The second is the research foundation of civil liability for marital tort. The current marriage and family legislation in our country does not clearly stipulate the problem of marital tort, which is an important reason why the marital tort cases can not be solved. Constitution, general principles of civil law, marriage law, tort liability law, there are no obstacles to accept marital tort litigation. The formulation of judicial interpretation should not only conform to the spirit of law, but also accord with the national conditions of our country. The main countries of Anglo-American law system and civil law system have special regulations and complete system on marital tort. The establishment of marital tort litigation system is not only in line with China's national conditions, but also conducive to the protection of vulnerable groups. Third, marital tort civil liability and its legislative perfection. Civil liability for marital tort refers to the existence of a marriage relationship, A spouse is liable to the victim for gross negligence or wilful violation of the law or acts that impair the lawful civil rights and interests of the other party and cause damage to the person or property of the other party or prejudice to the lawful civil rights and interests of the other party. In the future marriage and family law of the civil code, it should be stipulated that during the marriage relationship, one of the spouses intentionally or grossly negligently infringes the other party's personal or property rights and interests in the following ways, and shall bear the corresponding tort liability in accordance with the law. Where serious mental damage is caused to a spouse, he shall also bear the corresponding damage compensation liability: (1) infringing upon the spouse's right to name, personal liberty, body and health, sexual autonomy, reputation and reproductive rights, The right to privacy and other personal rights and interests (2) failing to perform the obligation of cohabitation, or failing to inform those who have a history of diseases such as physiological diseases or sexually transmitted diseases that affect fertility, (3) refusing to fulfil their obligations of maintenance, Infringement of the lawful property rights and interests of one spouse (4) other serious infringements on the spouse's lawful rights and interests. At the same time, the system of extraordinary property, mediation principles and marital tort statute of limitations. Fourth, perfect the judicial rules of civil liability for marital tort. In the current legal and judicial interpretation framework, marital tort litigation is not a piece of forbidden land. The court should adhere to the principle of mediation, explain the rules and merge the rules according to law. Victims should claim their legitimate rights and interests in accordance with legal and judicial interpretations, and learn to use the law to defend their dignity.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王賽丹;;《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》第36條之評析[J];公民與法(法學(xué)版);2014年01期

2 楊宏江;劉久成;;房屋建筑施工中質(zhì)量問題分析[J];科技創(chuàng)新與應(yīng)用;2014年13期

3 王月華;;飼養(yǎng)動物致人損害責(zé)任研究——基于我國《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》第78條的體系解讀[J];北京教育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2014年02期

4 鄔硯;;派遣勞動者致人損害的用人單位責(zé)任——對《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》第34條第2款的檢討[J];法律適用;2014年09期

5 羅施福;;侵害著作權(quán)之損害賠償責(zé)任比較研究——以兩岸著作權(quán)法及有關(guān)判例為視角[J];北方法學(xué);2014年05期

6 徐戀;;關(guān)系論視野下的被監(jiān)護人侵權(quán)責(zé)任[J];研究生法學(xué);2014年02期

7 管君;;論國家賠償中的“直接損失”[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2015年01期

8 徐銀波;;論計算財產(chǎn)損失的基準(zhǔn)時間——對《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》第19條的反思[J];北方法學(xué);2015年01期

9 蘇千祿;;試論侵權(quán)責(zé)任免責(zé)事由[J];法制博覽;2015年06期

10 鄧蕊;;論旅游輔助服務(wù)者的法律責(zé)任[J];西華大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2015年02期

相關(guān)會議論文 前1條

1 朱丹;;專利侵權(quán)懲罰性賠償責(zé)任的民法學(xué)基礎(chǔ)[A];專利法研究（2013）[C];2015年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 紀(jì)鎮(zhèn)南;特殊侵權(quán)行為歸責(zé)原則之研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2011年

2 李鈺;環(huán)境污染健康損害賠償制度研究[D];中央民族大學(xué);2012年

3 徐偉;網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者侵權(quán)責(zé)任理論基礎(chǔ)研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年

4 郭萬明;國際金融衍生品交易法律風(fēng)險及民事責(zé)任研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2014年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 邱振卓;論教育機構(gòu)對未成年學(xué)生的侵權(quán)責(zé)任[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

2 白木仁;雇主責(zé)任研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2011年

3 張金剛;論侵權(quán)行為中過錯推定原則的適用[D];蘭州大學(xué);2011年

4 李東陽;死亡賠償制度的思考[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年

5 劉文娟;我國汽車消費者權(quán)益保護法律問題研究[D];新疆財經(jīng)大學(xué);2011年

6 張啟彬;用人者責(zé)任研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2011年

7 柏華;論高校學(xué)生傷害事故中校方的民事法律責(zé)任[D];蘇州大學(xué);2011年

8 邱奎霖;專利侵權(quán)歸責(zé)原則辨析[D];南京大學(xué);2012年

9 劉文舒;民事侵權(quán)責(zé)任與刑事責(zé)任交叉問題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2012年

10 李萌萌;國際商事仲裁中的外國法查明問題研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：1791150