本文選題：離婚案件 + 房產(chǎn)按揭��； 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】：離婚案件按揭房產(chǎn)所有權(quán)人的界定及房產(chǎn)增值部分的分割問(wèn)題,因現(xiàn)行法律并無(wú)明確規(guī)定,故理論界及司法實(shí)務(wù)界爭(zhēng)議較大。為進(jìn)一步推動(dòng)該問(wèn)題的深入研究,為立法者及司法實(shí)務(wù)界提供一定的理論支持,本文試就該問(wèn)題展開(kāi)論證。 本文可分為兩大部分：第一部分從按揭房產(chǎn)的概念、種類及特征說(shuō)起,介紹在當(dāng)前的房產(chǎn)登記制度下,離婚案件必須界定按揭房產(chǎn)的所有權(quán)人,同時(shí)根據(jù)離婚時(shí)是否取得所有權(quán)、是婚前還是婚后取得所有權(quán)等,分析離婚時(shí)按揭房產(chǎn)所處的各個(gè)狀態(tài),之后從這些按揭房產(chǎn)所處的狀態(tài)出發(fā),分別界定不同狀態(tài)下的法律上的實(shí)際所有權(quán)人；第二部分在第一部分界定所有權(quán)人的基礎(chǔ)上,分析不同所有權(quán)人情況下的房產(chǎn)在婚姻存續(xù)期間增值部分應(yīng)否分割,并主要針對(duì)不享有所有權(quán)的一方婚后支付了一定按揭款或者認(rèn)定為夫妻共同財(cái)產(chǎn)而婚前一方支付了首付款,這兩種情況下的款項(xiàng)性質(zhì)認(rèn)定以及該款項(xiàng)對(duì)房產(chǎn)增值的作用進(jìn)行論證,最后參照實(shí)務(wù)界分割該部分增值款的方法,提出筆者認(rèn)為較為公平合理的分割方法。 筆者在論述本文觀點(diǎn)的同時(shí),還逐一對(duì)最高人民法院的《婚姻法司法解釋三草稿》第十三條以及上海市高級(jí)人民法院、江蘇省高級(jí)人民法院、廣東省高級(jí)人民、深圳市中級(jí)人民法院審判會(huì)議紀(jì)要中關(guān)于離婚案件按揭房產(chǎn)所有權(quán)人的界定及增值部分的分割規(guī)定進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)分析論證。對(duì)理論界一些較有代表性的觀點(diǎn),本文也進(jìn)行了分析。 對(duì)于離婚時(shí)按揭房產(chǎn)所有權(quán)人的界定,筆者的觀點(diǎn)主要有以下四點(diǎn)：1、對(duì)于由婚前一方按揭并支付了所有款項(xiàng),但房產(chǎn)所有權(quán)的取得在婚姻存續(xù)期間,并且登記在婚前一方名下的按揭房產(chǎn),筆者認(rèn)為所有權(quán)人為婚前一方；2、由婚前一方按揭并支付了首付款等,在婚前取得并登記了一方的名字,雖然婚后夫妻共同償還了部分按揭款,但所有權(quán)人為登記的婚前一方；3、由婚前一方按揭并支付了首付款等,并且婚后夫妻共同償還了部分按揭款,但所有權(quán)的取得在結(jié)婚以后,這時(shí)雖然房產(chǎn)證登記為一方的名字,但該房產(chǎn)應(yīng)認(rèn)定為夫妻共有；4、對(duì)于婚后取得所有權(quán),房產(chǎn)是由雙方婚后按揭并償還了全部按揭款的房產(chǎn),所有權(quán)人為夫妻雙方。 在界定完按揭房產(chǎn)所有權(quán)人的基礎(chǔ)上,筆者結(jié)合理論界、司法實(shí)務(wù)界及國(guó)外的立法觀點(diǎn),從一方償還按揭款或者支付首付款對(duì)房產(chǎn)取得、房產(chǎn)增值的貢獻(xiàn)及婚姻關(guān)系的本質(zhì)等出發(fā),分析認(rèn)為對(duì)于不享有所有權(quán)的一方婚后支付了一定按揭款或者認(rèn)定為夫妻共同財(cái)產(chǎn)而婚前一方支付了首付款兩種情況下的款項(xiàng),亦應(yīng)隨著房產(chǎn)的增值而增值,并在離婚時(shí)不僅要分得該款項(xiàng)的本金,而且增值部分亦應(yīng)分割。最后,筆者針對(duì)這兩種情況,提出了自認(rèn)為較為合理的增值部分分割方法。
[Abstract]:The definition of divorce cases mortgage property ownership and property value-added part of the segmentation problem, because the current law does not clearly defined, so the theory and judicial practice is still controversial. In order to further promote the further study of the problem, provide theoretical support for legislation and judicial practice, this paper discusses on the issue.
This paper can be divided into two parts: the first part from the concept of real estate mortgage, speaking of the type and characteristics, introduced in the current real estate registration system, divorce cases must be defined in the mortgage real estate ownership at the same time, according to whether the ownership when the divorce is before or after marriage, ownership, analysis of each state the mortgage property at the time of divorce after that, from these mortgage real estate conditions, defined respectively under different conditions of the actual legal owner; in the second part based on the analysis of the definition of ownership, not the same ownership under the condition of property during the marriage should be part of the value of segmentation, and because the ownership of a the marriage party to pay a certain mortgage or identified as the joint property of husband and wife and the marriage party to pay the first payment, identified the two case payment properties And the effect of the amount on the real estate increment is demonstrated. Finally, referring to the way of dividing the value-added part of the practice sector, I propose a more fair and reasonable segmentation method.
The author also discusses in this view, also one by one of the Supreme People's court's judicial interpretation of the marriage law three draft > thirteenth and the Shanghai Municipal Higher People's court, Supreme People's Court of Jiangsu Province, Guangdong province higher people, definition and part of the value of mortgage real estate ownership on divorce cases in Shenzhen City Intermediate People's court in the meeting minutes the provisions of the system analysis. The segmentation of the theory with some representative viewpoints, this paper also analysis.
The definition of divorce mortgage real estate ownership, the author's point of view there are four main points: 1, the marriage party mortgage and to pay all the money, but the real estate ownership acquired during the marriage, and marriage registration in the name of one of the mortgage property, the author thinks that ownership of human marriage party; 2 and by the marriage party mortgage and paid the first payment, in premarital obtain and registered party name, although married couples together to repay part of the mortgage, but the ownership of human registered marriage party; 3, by the marriage party mortgage and paid the first payment, and to repay part of married couples the mortgage, but the acquisition of ownership in the marriage, then although the real estate registration certificate for the name of the party, but the property should be identified as community; 4, to obtain ownership of real estate is married, and the two parties after the mortgage repayment The property of all mortgages is also owned by the husband and wife.
In the end based definition of mortgage real estate owners, according to the theory, judicial practice and legislative opinion abroad, from one side to repay the mortgage, or pay the first payment of real estate, real estate value contribution and the essence of marriage, analysts believe that the ownership of a marriage party does not pay a certain the mortgage or identified as the joint property of husband and wife and the marriage party to pay the first payment under the two conditions of money, should be with the property value and value, and at the time of divorce should not only share the amount of principal, and value-added part should also be segmented. Finally, the author of the two cases, segmentation is presented methods since that value-added part more reasonable.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D923.9

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 裴樺;;論夫妻一方婚前財(cái)產(chǎn)于婚后所生利益的歸屬[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2008年05期

2 田韶華;;婚姻領(lǐng)域內(nèi)物權(quán)變動(dòng)的法律適用[J];法學(xué);2009年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1745281