本文選題：放棄繼承　切入點：債權(quán)人　出處：《大連海事大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：隨著社會經(jīng)濟的快速發(fā)展,公民個人財產(chǎn)關系的日益復雜,《繼承法》在社會生活中的作用日益凸顯。在司法實踐中,因放棄繼承而引發(fā)的案件糾紛也逐漸增多,但是由于《繼承法》頒布較早,相關規(guī)定過于原則滯后,已不能很好的解決生活中出現(xiàn)的新問題新爭議,導致了放棄繼承人的債權(quán)人及配偶權(quán)益保護的缺失。同時《最高人民法院關于適用中華人民共和國婚姻法若干問題的解釋(三)》的出臺,雖然對配偶分割財產(chǎn)請求權(quán)做了規(guī)定,但依然沒有明確繼承人放棄繼承時,配偶一方的相應救濟權(quán)利。本文對該問題運用案例分析、對比等多種方法進行了分析,試圖對完善《繼承法》相關規(guī)定和債權(quán)人及配偶的權(quán)益保護提出有益的幫助。 本文除去引言和結(jié)論,可分為四個部分。 第一部分為放棄繼承與利害關系人權(quán)益保護概述。主要介紹了放棄繼承制度的內(nèi)涵、性質(zhì)和構(gòu)成要件,并在此基礎上了介紹了與放棄繼承相關的利害關系人,明確下文將主要對債權(quán)人及放棄繼承權(quán)人的配偶權(quán)益保護進行探討。 第二部分為放棄繼承中影響利害關系人的具體問題分析。通過分析放棄繼承制度中可能影響利害關系人的各種要件,并結(jié)合國外立法經(jīng)驗,指出了我國繼承法的缺陷和不足以及可能導致的損害。 第三部分為相關利害關系人的保護措施分析。結(jié)合放棄繼承制度,分別對債權(quán)人和配偶的利益保護措施進行了分析闡述。通過不同案例的切入,引出學術界的爭議和觀點,論述了利害關系人的救濟途徑。 第四部分為對利害關系人保護措施的建議。該部分主要從立法層面和具體措施方面進行闡述。結(jié)合前文的論述,提出完善《繼承法》相關規(guī)定的具體建議,并闡明了債權(quán)人和配偶的權(quán)益保護措施。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of social economy and the increasingly complex relationship between citizens' personal property, the "inheritance Law" plays an increasingly important role in social life. In judicial practice, the disputes caused by the abandonment of inheritance are also gradually increasing. However, due to the earlier promulgation of the inheritance Law and the lag of the relevant provisions in principle, it has not been able to solve the new problems and disputes that have arisen in life. At the same time, the interpretation of the Supreme people's Court on the application of the Marriage Law of the people's Republic of China (3) > was issued, although the right to claim for the division of property between spouses was stipulated. However, there is still no clear right of relief for one spouse when the heirs give up succession. This paper analyzes the problem by case study, comparison and other methods. This paper attempts to provide useful help to improve the relevant provisions of inheritance Law and the protection of the rights and interests of creditors and spouses. Apart from the introduction and conclusion, this paper can be divided into four parts. The first part is an overview of the waiver of succession and the protection of the rights and interests of interested parties. It mainly introduces the connotation, nature and constitutive requirements of the system of waiver of succession, and on this basis introduces the interested parties related to the waiver of succession. It is clear that the protection of the spouse's rights and interests of creditors and discards will be discussed below. The second part is the analysis of the specific problems that affect the interested parties in the waiver of succession. Through the analysis of the various elements which may affect the interested parties in the system of waiver of inheritance, and combined with the foreign legislative experience, The defects and deficiencies of inheritance law and the possible damages are pointed out. The third part is the analysis of the protective measures of the relevant interested parties. Combined with the system of waiver of inheritance, the author analyzes and expounds the measures of protecting the interests of creditors and spouses respectively. Through different cases, it leads to the controversy and viewpoint of the academic circles. This paper discusses the ways of relief for the interested parties. Part 4th is the suggestion for the protection measures of the interested parties. This part is mainly from the legislative level and the specific measures. Combined with the previous discussion, it puts forward specific suggestions to improve the relevant provisions of the inheritance Law. It also clarifies the protection measures of creditors and spouses.
【學位授予單位】：大連海事大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.5

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 王薇;;外國繼承的接受與放棄制度比較研究[J];重慶社會科學;2007年01期

2 張義華;財產(chǎn)繼承中債權(quán)人權(quán)利的保護[J];法律適用;2004年05期

3 王竹青;薛峰;;關于離婚時尚未分割遺產(chǎn)的處理 評《婚姻法》第17條第4項[J];法律適用;2010年12期

4 劉璐;;惡意串通行為研究[J];法制與社會;2008年05期

5 李剛;;論夫妻一方婚內(nèi)單獨放棄繼承的效力——兼評我國《繼承法》第25條與《婚姻法》第17條[J];廣西政法管理干部學院學報;2011年04期

6 趙俊;;論我國的放棄繼承制度[J];河北民族師范學院學報;2012年04期

7 楊蓉卉;;在債權(quán)人保護的視野下淺議我國遺產(chǎn)債務清償制度的完善[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(下旬);2013年03期

8 屈坦;;論我國當然繼承主義與放棄繼承之沖突與解決[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年07期

9 楊塞蘭;;債務人放棄繼承危及債權(quán)的,債權(quán)人可行使撤銷權(quán)[J];人民司法;2010年02期

10 趙娟;;繼承權(quán)放棄相關問題之探析[J];山東行政學院.山東省經(jīng)濟管理干部學院學報;2010年04期

，

本文編號：1635066