本文選題：親權(quán)　切入點(diǎn)：未成年子女　出處：《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2008年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 親權(quán)是父母基于其身份,對(duì)于未成年子女以教養(yǎng)保護(hù)為目的之權(quán)利義務(wù)的集合。親權(quán)制度是近現(xiàn)代各國(guó)民法中,規(guī)范父母與子女關(guān)系的一項(xiàng)重要的法律制度。由于我國(guó)現(xiàn)行親屬法制度的欠缺,在實(shí)踐中發(fā)生了很多父母與未成年子女間的爭(zhēng)議或糾紛,尤其表現(xiàn)在未成年子女的隱私權(quán)、財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)、人身權(quán)等三個(gè)方面。本文通過(guò)分析發(fā)生糾紛的原因,借鑒其他國(guó)家和地區(qū)法律制度中的規(guī)定,分析了我國(guó)在親子關(guān)系上立法的缺失與不足,重點(diǎn)對(duì)親權(quán)與未成年子女上述權(quán)利間的沖突進(jìn)行了分析,提出了具體的制度性的完善建議,以充分保護(hù)未成年子女的合法權(quán)益,同時(shí)保障父母對(duì)親權(quán)的合理行使。 本文由四個(gè)部分組成: 第一章親權(quán)制度基本理論。簡(jiǎn)要介紹了親權(quán)制度的起源及演化過(guò)程、內(nèi)容與性質(zhì)以及我國(guó)與親權(quán)相關(guān)的制度,并提出了所存在的問(wèn)題。 第二章親權(quán)與未成年子女隱私權(quán)。闡述了隱私權(quán)與未成年子女隱私權(quán)的基本概念與范圍,分析了我國(guó)目前未成年人隱私權(quán)和親權(quán)的沖突的表現(xiàn)形式與原因。提出了親權(quán)與未成年子女隱私權(quán)沖突的協(xié)調(diào)規(guī)則,即在法律中確立親權(quán)制度,在未成年人保護(hù)法等法律中明確禁止父母侵犯未成年子女隱私權(quán)的典型行為,以及在立法中明確規(guī)定兩個(gè)權(quán)利沖突時(shí)的協(xié)調(diào)原則。 第三章未成年人財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)。首先通過(guò)兩個(gè)典型案例引出實(shí)踐中涉及未成年人財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)的典型案件及涉及問(wèn)題。其次簡(jiǎn)要介紹了未成年人財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)歷史發(fā)展以及賦予未成年人財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)的意義;對(duì)未成年人財(cái)產(chǎn)的范圍進(jìn)行了界定;分析了父母對(duì)未成年子女財(cái)產(chǎn)的權(quán)利義務(wù),父母對(duì)未成年子女財(cái)產(chǎn)的處分及其效力。最后,分析了我國(guó)現(xiàn)行保護(hù)未成年人財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)的法律體系,指出了現(xiàn)行立法的缺陷,提出了自己的立法建議,并對(duì)所舉的兩個(gè)案例結(jié)合本文觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行了解答。 第四章未成年子女人身權(quán)。首先分析了與未成年子女人身權(quán)相關(guān)的三個(gè)概念:管教權(quán)、保護(hù)教育權(quán)、懲戒權(quán)。其次對(duì)于兩大法系具有代表性的國(guó)家和地區(qū)對(duì)于管教權(quán)的規(guī)定進(jìn)行了簡(jiǎn)要介紹。再次通過(guò)父母侵害未成年子女人身權(quán)的具體行為,從社會(huì)歷史、父母自身、現(xiàn)行法律制度欠缺等三個(gè)角度分析了原因,最后,通過(guò)對(duì)懲戒權(quán)是否應(yīng)入典的爭(zhēng)論,提出了關(guān)于未成年人人身權(quán)保護(hù)的立法建議。
[Abstract]:Parental right is a collection of rights and obligations of parents based on their identity and aiming at the protection of minor children. The system of parental authority is a civil law in modern and modern countries. It is an important legal system to regulate the relationship between parents and children. Because of the lack of the current relative law system in our country, there have been many disputes or disputes between parents and minor children in practice, especially in the right to privacy of minor children. By analyzing the causes of disputes and drawing lessons from the legal system of other countries and regions, this paper analyzes the lack and deficiency of legislation on parent-child relations in China. This paper analyzes the conflict between parental right and the above rights of minor children, and puts forward some specific institutional suggestions to fully protect the legitimate rights and interests of minor children, and at the same time to ensure the reasonable exercise of parental rights by parents. This paper consists of four parts:. The first chapter briefly introduces the origin and evolution process, content and nature of paternity system and the system related to paternity in China, and puts forward the existing problems. The second chapter expounds the basic concept and scope of the right to privacy and the right to privacy of minor children. This paper analyzes the forms and causes of the conflict between the right to privacy and parental right of minors in our country, and puts forward the coordination rules of the conflict between parental right and the right of privacy of minor children, that is, to establish the system of parental right in the law. The typical behavior of parents violating the right to privacy of minor children is explicitly prohibited in laws such as the law on protection of minors, and the principle of coordination when the two rights conflict is clearly stipulated in the legislation. The third chapter introduces the property rights of minors. Firstly, through two typical cases, it leads to the typical cases and problems concerning the property rights of minors in practice. Secondly, it briefly introduces the historical development of the property rights of minors and the imputation of minors' property rights. The meaning of adult property rights; It defines the scope of minor property, analyzes the rights and obligations of parents to the property of minor children, and the disposition and effectiveness of parents to minor children's property. This paper analyzes the current legal system of protecting the property rights of minors in our country, points out the defects of the current legislation, puts forward its own legislative suggestions, and gives an answer to the two cases given in this paper. Chapter 4th analyzes the personal rights of minor children. Firstly, three concepts related to the personal rights of minor children are analyzed: the right to discipline, the right to education, the right to education, and the right to education. Secondly, it briefly introduces the provisions of the right of discipline in the representative countries and regions of the two major legal systems. Again, through the specific acts of parents infringing upon the personal rights of minor children, from the social history, the parents themselves, This paper analyzes the reasons from three angles, such as the deficiency of the current legal system, and finally puts forward some legislative suggestions on the protection of the personal rights of minors through the debate on whether the right of punishment should be included in the code.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類號(hào)】：D923

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 林楓;論未成年人財(cái)產(chǎn)監(jiān)護(hù)制度[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2011年

2 於洛;學(xué)校教育中的家長(zhǎng)教育權(quán)利及其保障研究[D];江西師范大學(xué);2012年

3 劉偉;親權(quán)濫用法律問(wèn)題研究[D];山東大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1620762