本文選題：姓名權(quán)　切入點：未成年子女　出處：《大連海事大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：姓名權(quán)是人格利益重要的承載體,關(guān)系人的自由發(fā)展。未成年子女姓名權(quán)對處于成長期的子女具有深刻影響,保護好未成年子女姓名權(quán)對于子女身心健康的良好發(fā)展具有重要作用。我國現(xiàn)有的法律規(guī)范對子女姓名權(quán)的規(guī)定相對較少,社會對未成年子女姓名權(quán)的關(guān)注程度較低。然而隨著離婚家庭數(shù)量的增多,父母離婚后未成年子女姓名權(quán)糾紛案例逐年增加,司法審判中存在著相同案件事實而裁判結(jié)果不同的情況。學(xué)者對于父母離婚后擅自變更子女姓名的問題也存在著不同的看法。2015年國家法官學(xué)院將父母離婚后擅自變更子女姓名糾紛案件作為唯一案例匯編于姓名權(quán)篇中,其意義的重要性可想而知。本文除引言、結(jié)論外,共分為五部分。第一部分,通過對比兩起離婚后父母擅自變更子女姓名糾紛的典型案例,引出相同案件事實不同裁判結(jié)果的問題,得出父母能否單方面變更子女姓名和是否考慮子女意見兩個焦點問題。第二部分,對父母離婚后未成年子女姓名權(quán)進行概述,總結(jié)分析了未成年子女姓名的權(quán)利基礎(chǔ)和內(nèi)容,論證得出父母離婚后仍然共同行使未成年子女姓名權(quán)。第三部分,通過舉例分析國外關(guān)于姓名權(quán)的法律規(guī)范,吸收其精華部分,為我國完善姓名權(quán)法律規(guī)范提供借鑒。第四部分,在總結(jié)我國姓名權(quán)發(fā)展過程的基礎(chǔ)上詳細分析了我國關(guān)于姓名權(quán)的主要法律規(guī)范。第五部分,結(jié)合我國實際情況,提出完善我國父母離婚后未成年子女姓名權(quán)的建議。筆者認為行使未成年子女姓名權(quán)應(yīng)堅持子女利益最大化和尊重子女意見原則,戶籍機關(guān)應(yīng)完善對子女姓名變更的管理,健全相應(yīng)法律規(guī)范,明確父母離婚后仍共同決定未成年子女姓名,一方不得擅自變更子女姓名,但責(zé)令其恢復(fù)原姓氏時應(yīng)合理考慮子女改姓后的使用及知曉程度。
[Abstract]:The right to name is an important carrier of the interests of personality, which is related to the free development of human beings. The right to name of minor children has a profound impact on the children in the growing period. It is very important to protect the right to name of minor children for the healthy development of their physical and mental health. However, with the increase of the number of divorced families, the dispute cases of minor children's right to name after divorce increased year by year. There are the same facts and different results in the judicial trial. Scholars also have different views on the problem of changing the children's names without authorization after the divorce of parents. 2015, the state academy of judges will divorce the parents without authorization. The case of a dispute over changing the name of a child is compiled as a sole case in the title of the right to name, In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper is divided into five parts. The first part, by comparing two typical cases of parents' unauthorized change of their children's names after divorce, The author draws the conclusion that whether parents can unilaterally change the name of their children and whether to consider the opinions of the children. The second part summarizes the right to name of minor children after the divorce of parents. This paper summarizes and analyzes the basis and content of the right to name of minor children, and proves that parents still jointly exercise the right of name of minor children after divorce. The third part, through the analysis of foreign legal norms on the right to name through examples, absorbs the essence of the right to name. Part 4th provides reference for our country to perfect the legal norm of the right of name. On the basis of summing up the development process of the right of name in our country, it analyzes in detail the main legal norm of the right of name in our country. 5th part, combined with the actual situation of our country, This paper puts forward some suggestions on how to improve the right to name of minor children after divorce. The author holds that the principle of maximizing the interests of children and respecting the opinions of children should be adhered to in the exercise of the right to name of minor children, and the household registration office should perfect the management of the change of children's names. Perfect the corresponding legal norm, make it clear that the parents still decide the minor child's name jointly after divorce, one party may not change the child's name without authorization, but order them to restore their original family name, should consider the use and the degree of knowledge after the children's changing surname reasonably.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 任江;張小余;;子女姓名決定、變更權(quán)的實證分析與啟示——實證主義路徑下的我國首部民法立法解釋評析[J];河北法學(xué);2015年11期

2 李永軍;;論姓名權(quán)的性質(zhì)與法律保護[J];比較法研究;2012年01期

3 張博;;關(guān)于公安機關(guān)受理公民姓名變更申請的若干思考[J];法制與社會;2011年25期

4 魯?shù)澋?;論公民姓名變更權(quán)濫用的法律規(guī)制[J];湖北經(jīng)濟學(xué)院學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2011年03期

5 夏吟蘭;何俊萍;;現(xiàn)代大陸法系親屬法之發(fā)展變革[J];法學(xué)論壇;2011年02期

6 張建文;賈佳;;論我國姓名變更權(quán)的法律限制問題[J];河北法學(xué);2011年03期

7 于維君;;婦女運動與臺灣地區(qū)民法親屬編的現(xiàn)代轉(zhuǎn)型[J];政法學(xué)刊;2009年06期

8 陳丹妮;;對“趙C案”的法理思考[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2009年05期

9 郭站紅;;姓氏立法芻議[J];中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院學(xué)報;2009年03期

10 袁仕益;;姓名權(quán)法律保護之研究[J];法制與社會;2009年09期

，

本文編號：1611137