本文關(guān)鍵詞： 物權(quán)行為 歷史 邏輯　出處：《西南石油大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：我國(guó)實(shí)施的《物權(quán)法》,極大地解放了生產(chǎn)力,促進(jìn)了市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展,收到了良好的社會(huì)效果。在實(shí)踐的檢驗(yàn)中,《物權(quán)法》也逐步凸顯出部分局限性,其中最大的缺憾在于忽視了理論的先導(dǎo)和引導(dǎo)作用�！皼](méi)有革命的理論,就不會(huì)有革命的運(yùn)動(dòng)”。始終不肯正面肯定物權(quán)行為理論的《物權(quán)法》,卻在處處彰顯著物權(quán)行為理論的光彩,這不能不說(shuō)是一種局限�；诖�,本文由社會(huì)現(xiàn)象入手,介紹了物權(quán)行為理論,又運(yùn)用歷史和邏輯相統(tǒng)一的方法客觀探究了德國(guó)、法國(guó)和瑞士對(duì)物權(quán)行為理論立法淵源,在此基礎(chǔ)上用歷史和邏輯相統(tǒng)一的方法分析物權(quán)行為理論在我國(guó)的發(fā)展軌跡,得出我國(guó)必然采納物權(quán)行為理論的結(jié)論,以期為我國(guó)物權(quán)法的發(fā)展略盡綿薄。全文共分五部分,約31000字。 第一部分緒論,首先介紹了選題背景與研究意義,概述了物權(quán)行為理論的國(guó)內(nèi)外現(xiàn)狀,介紹了文章的主要內(nèi)容、研究思路和研究方法。 第二部分精煉而全面的介紹了物權(quán)行為理論。從《婚姻法解釋三》引起的社會(huì)輿論入手,提煉出蘊(yùn)藏在現(xiàn)象本后的物權(quán)行為理論。介紹了物權(quán)行為的概念、淵源、特性、與債權(quán)行為的區(qū)別及三種不同的物權(quán)變動(dòng)立法模式。 第三部分按歷史發(fā)展的脈絡(luò)介紹了歷史和邏輯相統(tǒng)一方法。依次介紹了黑格爾關(guān)于歷史和邏輯相統(tǒng)一理論的認(rèn)識(shí)、馬克思對(duì)黑格爾學(xué)說(shuō)的發(fā)展和突破和歷史和邏輯的辯證統(tǒng)一關(guān)系,最后強(qiáng)調(diào)了用歷史和邏輯相統(tǒng)一的方法分析物權(quán)行為理論的方法論意義。 第四部分用歷史和邏輯相統(tǒng)一的方法分別對(duì)德國(guó)、法國(guó)、瑞士就物權(quán)行為理論采取了不同的立法選擇進(jìn)入探究。得出各國(guó)立法模式的選擇都是本國(guó)實(shí)際同先進(jìn)科學(xué)理論綜合的結(jié)果。 第五部分將目光轉(zhuǎn)回我國(guó),用歷史和邏輯相統(tǒng)一的方法深入的分析和論證了物權(quán)行為理論在我國(guó)的歷史發(fā)展過(guò)程和邏輯發(fā)展軌跡,得出我國(guó)立法采納物權(quán)行為理論的必然性,并將理論上的結(jié)論與我國(guó)現(xiàn)狀對(duì)比,得出我國(guó)物權(quán)行為理論的不足,進(jìn)而得出第六部分的結(jié)論,提出完善我國(guó)物權(quán)行為的建議。
[Abstract]:The implementation of the Real right Law in China has greatly liberated the productive forces, promoted the development of the market economy, and received good social effects. In the examination of practice, the property Law has gradually highlighted some limitations. The biggest drawback is that it ignores the leading and guiding role of theory. "there is no revolutionary theory. There will be no revolutionary movement. "the Real Law, which has always refused to affirm positively the theory of the act of real right, is showing the luster of the theory of the act of real right everywhere. This cannot be said to be a limitation. Based on this, this article begins with social phenomena. This paper introduces the theory of the act of real right, and explores objectively the legislative origin of the theory of the act of real right in Germany, France and Switzerland by using the method of unifying history and logic. On this basis, the author analyzes the development of the theory of act of real right in our country by the method of unifying history and logic, and draws the conclusion that the theory of act of real right must be adopted in our country, in order to do a little bit for the development of real right law of our country. About 31000 words. The first part introduces the background and significance of the topic, summarizes the current situation of the theory of real right act at home and abroad, introduces the main content of the article, research ideas and research methods. The second part introduces the theory of the act of real right in a concise and comprehensive way. Starting from the public opinion caused by the interpretation of the Marriage Law, the author abstracts the theory of the act of real right hidden after the phenomenon, and introduces the concept, origin, characteristics of the act of real right. Different from creditor's rights act and three different legislative modes of real right change. The third part introduces the method of unifying history and logic according to the historical development, and then introduces Hegel's understanding of the theory of unification of history and logic. Marx's development and breakthrough of Hegel's theory and dialectical unity of history and logic. Finally, it emphasizes the methodological significance of analyzing the theory of juristic act of real right by the method of unifying history and logic. 4th parts of the history and logic of the United methods of Germany, France, Switzerland has adopted different legislative choices on the theory of juristic act of real right, and it is concluded that the choice of legislative mode in various countries is the result of the integration of national reality and advanced scientific theory. In the 5th part, we turn our eyes back to our country, analyze and demonstrate the historical development process and logical development track of the theory of real right act in our country with the unified method of history and logic, and get the inevitability of adopting the theory of real right act in legislation of our country. By comparing the theoretical conclusion with the present situation of our country, the author draws the conclusion that the theory of real right act of our country is insufficient, and then draws the conclusion of 6th parts, and puts forward some suggestions to perfect the act of real right in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南石油大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D923.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 任琳;;淺析馬克思主義“邏輯與歷史相統(tǒng)一”的原理及方法[J];哈爾濱市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2012年03期

2 唐驥;;論瑞士民法典的立法特色[J];重慶科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年10期

3 曹勝亮;;論物權(quán)行為的獨(dú)立性與無(wú)因性及我國(guó)的立法選擇[J];法學(xué)雜志;2006年03期

4 嚴(yán)劍冰;;物權(quán)變動(dòng)模式之比較研究[J];公民與法(法學(xué)版);2011年06期

5 胡泉;;物權(quán)行為理論的重新思考[J];甘肅農(nóng)業(yè);2006年11期

6 鄭俊麗;論鄧小平的選人用人思想[J];安陽(yáng)師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期

7 聞U，

本文編號(hào)：1521807