本文關鍵詞： 日常家事代理權 日常家事 夫妻債務 連帶責任　出處：《華東政法大學》2007年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】： 日常家事代理權又稱為家事代理權,作為配偶權中的一項重要內(nèi)容,是傳統(tǒng)民法親屬法中用以規(guī)范夫妻關系的一項重要制度。日常家事代理權是指夫妻一方在因家庭日常事務而與第三人為一定的法律行為時,享有代理配偶他方的權利。具體地說,夫妻一方代表家庭所為的日常家務法律行為,視為夫妻共同的意思表示,夫妻他方亦必須承擔法律后果,夫妻雙方對該行為承擔共同的連帶責任。 創(chuàng)建這一制度的原因有如下幾點:首先,男女一旦結(jié)婚,便創(chuàng)設夫妻這一身份關系,組成一個共同生活的家庭。為維持家庭的日常生活,產(chǎn)生日常的家庭事務如何執(zhí)行、日常家庭事務范圍的財產(chǎn)權如何行使以及由此產(chǎn)生的債務該如何承擔等問題。其次,夫妻關系乃是人與人之間最緊密的聯(lián)系,婚姻家庭中的財產(chǎn)關系由于與人身關系密不可分且具有很大的隱秘性。這種特點在夫妻一方與第三人進行交易時,對第三人的利益產(chǎn)生極大的影響。因此有必要利用法律規(guī)范保護第三人利益。 長期以來我國的婚姻立法對此缺乏關注。新《婚姻法》及相關解釋頒布后,有學者認為《婚姻法》第17條第1款的規(guī)定已經(jīng)包含夫妻之間的日常家事代理權。但筆者認為“夫妻對共同所有的財產(chǎn),有平等的處理權”這一規(guī)定,立法的著眼點在于夫妻的內(nèi)部關系,而日常家事代理制度針對的是夫妻與第三人之間的法律關系。之后《婚姻法解釋(一)》第17條第1款對日常家事代理權進行了規(guī)定。但仍存在一定的問題:此項司法解釋沒有涉及日常家事代理法律行為的范圍、行使方式、后果承擔等基本問題,不具可操作性。因此仍需對此項制度進一步研究,逐步完善我國相關立法。 本文對日常家事代理權進行了較為全面的探討和分析,針對我國現(xiàn)行立法的不足,在借鑒其他國家立法經(jīng)驗的基礎上,對完善我國的立法提出一些建議,希望能對我國正在制定中的民法典婚姻法部分有所貢獻。本文共分為四部分,約三萬五千字。 第一部分系日常家事代理權概述。主要介紹日常家事代理權的定義、理論起源及這一制度的意義。這一部分是全文的基礎。作者首先論述了日常家事代理權的含義,接下來從大陸法系及英美法系兩個方面梳理了這一制度產(chǎn)生、發(fā)展的過程,并闡述了研究意義。 第二部分為日常家事代理權的性質(zhì)。作者首先列舉現(xiàn)有關于日常家事代理權的各種理論并分別加以評述,依據(jù)民法學原理及現(xiàn)有法律規(guī)范,提出自己的看法即日常家事代理是特殊的法定代理。在認清日常家事代理權性質(zhì)的基礎上,筆者繼續(xù)探討了日常家事代理權究竟屬于夫妻財產(chǎn)效力還是夫妻身份效力這一問題。 第三部分為日常家事代理權的比較法研究。以法國、瑞士、德國、日本、我國臺灣、英國、美國等國家及地區(qū)為例,從日常家事代理權限范圍、權利行使等方面加以分析、歸納。通過各國立法例的比較,分析其優(yōu)劣,為我國日常家事代理制度的建立和完善提供一定的借鑒意義。 第四部分系對我國婚姻立法有關日常家事代理權規(guī)定的檢討,該部分是本文的重點。在分析了我國日常家事代理制度立法現(xiàn)狀的基礎上,借鑒其他國家的立法經(jīng)驗,結(jié)合我國的國情及相關的夫妻法律制度,為我國日常家事代理權的完善提出了具體的建議。
[Abstract]:The daily chores agency called the family agency, as an important content of spouse right and is in the traditional relative law an important system to regulate the relationship between husband and wife. The daily chores agency refers to one of the spouses in the family because of daily affairs and third people enjoy certain legal behavior, agency the other spouse rights. Specifically, the daily chores of legal acts of one of the spouses is on behalf of the family, as husband and wife together mean that other couples must also bear the legal consequences of the act, the couple shared joint responsibility.
The reason for this system is as follows: first, men and women once married, they create a couple of this identity relationship, a common family life. In order to maintain the family's daily life, daily household affairs to carry on the daily family affairs scope of property rights and how to exercise the resulting debt of the problem how to bear. Secondly, the relationship between husband and wife is the most close relationship between people, marriage and family relations in the property and personal relations are inseparable and is very hidden. The characteristics of trade in one of the spouses and third people, have a great impact on the interests of the third person. So it is necessary to the use of legal norms to protect the interests of the third party.
Long term since the marriage legislation of our country. The lack of attention to this new "marriage law" and related judicial interpretation promulgated, some scholars believe that the provisions of the first paragraph of "marriage law" has been included seventeenth couples daily chores agency. But I think that "on the common property of all couples have equal rights" of the the focus is on the legislative provisions of the internal relationship between husband and wife, and for the daily chores agency system is the legal relationship between husband and wife and third people. After the "marriage law interpretation of paragraph first (a) > seventeenth provisions for the daily chores agency. But there are still some problems: the judicial interpretation no scope that relates to the housekeeping agency legal exercise, the basic problems of consequences, not feasible. Therefore this system still need further study, and gradually improve the relevant legislation in our country.
This paper discussed and analyzed on the daily household matters authority, aiming at the defects of our current legislation, on the basis of the legislative experience of other countries, the author puts forward some suggestions to perfect the legislation of our country, hoping to contribute to the civil marriage law in China is being developed. This paper is divided into the four part, about thirty-five thousand words.
The first part of the Department of the daily chores agency. Mainly introduces the overview of the daily chores agency definition, theory origin and significance of this system. This is the basic part of this paper. The author first discusses the meaning of the daily chores agency, then from the two aspects of the common law and civil law elaborated this system development. In the process, and expounds the significance of the research.
The second part is the right of daily family agent properties. Firstly the author lists existing about the daily chores agency theory and were to be reviewed, according to the civil law principle and the existing legal norms, put forward their own views that housekeeping agency is a special statutory agency. In the clear recognition foundation of daily housework agency properties, are discussed the daily chores agency really belongs to matrimonial property or marital status effect effect of this problem the author continues to.
The third part is the comparative study of daily housework agency. In France, Switzerland, Germany, Japan, China Taiwan, Britain, the United States and other countries and regions as an example, from the daily household matters authority, the exercise of rights and other aspects of analysis, summarized. Through comparison of national legislation, and analyzes their advantages and disadvantages, in order to establish and provide a reference to improve our daily chores agency system.
The fourth part is to review the provisions of China's marriage law about the daily chores agency, this part is the focus of this paper. Based on the analysis of the status quo of China's legislation of daily chores agency system, learn from the legislative experience of other countries, combined with China's national conditions and the related matrimonial legal system, put forward specific proposals for our daily chores agency perfect.

【學位授予單位】：華東政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2007
【分類號】：D913

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 雷蘭福;;夫妻共同債務相關法律制度的完善探討[J];法制與社會;2011年21期

2 王瑞;;論夫妻共同債務的認定和清償[J];法制與社會;2011年26期

3 陳本寒;艾圍利;;夫妻間人格權關系研究[J];時代法學;2011年04期

4 黃海燕;;論夫妻共有房產(chǎn)中的隱名共有人權益保護[J];齊魯師范學院學報;2011年03期

5 覃卓君;;淺議我國夫妻財產(chǎn)制的缺陷及立法完善[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(上旬刊);2011年02期

6 ;[J];;年期

7 ;[J];;年期

8 ;[J];;年期

9 ;[J];;年期

10 ;[J];;年期

相關重要報紙文章 前5條

1 中國社會科學院法學研究所研究員 薛寧蘭;婚姻家庭法需要不同于財產(chǎn)法的調(diào)整規(guī)則[N];中國婦女報;2010年

2 本報記者　張靖;修改后的《婚姻法》仍然面對許多空白[N];北京日報;2002年

3 章建生;夫妻家事代理之性質(zhì)及法律后果[N];人民法院報;2004年

4 趙新華;家事代理與夫妻共同債務[N];人民法院報;2004年

5 本報記者 田浩 本報通訊員 祁云奎 畢惠巖;婚內(nèi)單方舉債:個人債務還是共同債務[N];人民法院報;2009年

相關碩士學位論文 前10條

1 孫妍;論日常家事代理權[D];華東政法大學;2007年

2 蔣娜娜;論夫妻債務的認定[D];西南政法大學;2009年

3 鐘凌云;論我國日常家事代理權制度的完善[D];湖南師范大學;2010年

4 熊雅莉;論日常家事代理權[D];華中科技大學;2011年

5 王立衡;日常家事代理權問題研究[D];寧波大學;2012年

6 李博;日常家事代理權研究[D];揚州大學;2011年

7 司丹;夫妻日常家事代理權研究[D];黑龍江大學;2010年

8 喻欣霞;論夫妻日常家事代理權[D];西南政法大學;2011年

9 蘇敏;論日常家事代理權[D];武漢大學;2005年

10 周薇;夫妻債務制度研究[D];云南大學;2010年

，

本文編號：1495521