【摘要】：勞動(dòng)者罹患疾病后通常可能會(huì)暫時(shí)喪失勞動(dòng)能力甚至無(wú)法參加工作,直接導(dǎo)致勞動(dòng)收入的減少甚至喪失,這常常會(huì)給勞動(dòng)者及其家庭成員的生活帶來(lái)負(fù)面影響,極有可能出現(xiàn)因病致貧的現(xiàn)象。因此,各國(guó)都通過(guò)立法對(duì)勞動(dòng)者醫(yī)療期的收入進(jìn)行一定的保障,以減少上述現(xiàn)象的發(fā)生。 我國(guó)主要通過(guò)《勞動(dòng)法》、《勞動(dòng)合同法》、《企業(yè)職工患病或非因公負(fù)傷醫(yī)療期規(guī)定》以及相關(guān)的法律規(guī)定的建立來(lái)構(gòu)建醫(yī)療期內(nèi)勞動(dòng)者收入保障制度,具體表現(xiàn)為病假工資、解雇保護(hù)和疾病救濟(jì)費(fèi)三個(gè)方面,實(shí)踐中通常由用人單位承擔(dān)患病職工在醫(yī)療期內(nèi)的病假工資發(fā)放義務(wù),并且為其保留工作崗位至員工復(fù)職。但同時(shí)應(yīng)當(dāng)認(rèn)識(shí)到目前該制度在實(shí)踐中產(chǎn)生了諸多問(wèn)題,例如勞動(dòng)者病假工資無(wú)法及時(shí)獲得甚至直接被克扣,醫(yī)療期內(nèi)被違法解雇等,這都導(dǎo)致了勞動(dòng)者在醫(yī)療期內(nèi)的收入無(wú)法真正得到保障。因此,本文從比較法角度,將我國(guó)的醫(yī)療期勞動(dòng)者收入保障制度與其他國(guó)家及地區(qū)的相關(guān)制度進(jìn)行比較分析,吸收并借鑒域外立法例的優(yōu)點(diǎn),以期進(jìn)一步完善我國(guó)醫(yī)療期內(nèi)勞動(dòng)者收入保障制度。 本文第一部分通過(guò)三則案例,引出我國(guó)現(xiàn)行的醫(yī)療期勞動(dòng)者收入保障制度包括三項(xiàng)具體制度：醫(yī)療期病假工資、解雇保護(hù)和疾病救濟(jì)費(fèi)制度。并提出我國(guó)現(xiàn)有三項(xiàng)制度在實(shí)踐運(yùn)用中仍有不足；第二部分以《企業(yè)職工患病或非因工負(fù)傷醫(yī)療期規(guī)定》《勞動(dòng)合同法》等法律規(guī)定為依據(jù),剖析了我國(guó)醫(yī)療期勞動(dòng)者收入保障制度的運(yùn)作模式；第三部分通過(guò)對(duì)我國(guó)臺(tái)灣地區(qū)和德國(guó)醫(yī)療期勞動(dòng)者收入保障制度的分析,并以之與我國(guó)的保障制度比較,得出目前我國(guó)醫(yī)療期勞動(dòng)者收入保障制度存在的具體缺陷；第四部分通過(guò)提出對(duì)病假工資、解雇保護(hù)和疾病救濟(jì)費(fèi)制度的具體改進(jìn)建議,期望完善我國(guó)醫(yī)療期勞動(dòng)者收入保障制度。 本文的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)主要在于提出醫(yī)療期勞動(dòng)者收入保障制度的概念,并且立足于解釋論而不是立法論的角度,重新審視我國(guó)的疾病工資制度、解雇保護(hù)制度及疾病救濟(jì)費(fèi)制度,進(jìn)而完善我國(guó)醫(yī)療期勞動(dòng)者收入保障制度。
[Abstract]:After suffering from illness, workers may be temporarily incapacitated or even unable to participate in work, which directly leads to the reduction or even loss of labor income, which often has a negative impact on the lives of workers and their family members, and is most likely to lead to poverty as a result of illness. Therefore, all countries adopt legislation to protect the income of workers during the medical period in order to reduce the occurrence of the above phenomena. Our country mainly constructs the worker income security system during the medical period through the Labor Law, the Labor contract Law, the provisions on the Medical period of sick or non-official injury to the staff and Workers of the Enterprise, and the establishment of the relevant legal provisions, which are embodied in three aspects: sick leave salary, dismissal protection and sickness relief fee. In practice, the employer usually undertakes the obligation to pay sick leave wages for sick workers during the medical period. And reserve jobs for them until employees are reinstated. At the same time, it should be recognized that the current system has many problems in practice, such as workers' sick leave salary can not be obtained in time or even directly deducted, medical period is illegally dismissed, and so on, which leads to workers' income in the medical period can not be really guaranteed. Therefore, from the point of view of comparative law, this paper compares and analyzes the income security system of medical workers in China with the relevant systems of other countries and regions, and absorbs and draws lessons from the advantages of foreign legislation, in order to further improve the income security system of workers in the medical period of our country. Through three cases, the first part of this paper leads to the current income security system of medical workers in China, which includes three specific systems: sick leave salary during medical period, dismissal protection and sickness relief system. The second part analyzes the operation mode of the income security system of the workers in our country on the basis of the provisions of the medical period of illness or non-work injury of the employees of the enterprise, the labor contract law and other legal provisions, and analyzes the operation mode of the income security system of the workers in the medical period of our country. The third part analyzes the income security system of workers in Taiwan and Germany, and compares it with the security system of our country, and obtains the concrete defects of the income security system of workers in medical period in our country at present. The fourth part puts forward some suggestions for improving the system of sick leave salary, dismissal protection and disease relief fee, hoping to perfect the income security system of workers in medical period of our country. The innovation of this paper mainly lies in putting forward the concept of income security system for workers in medical period, and based on the theory of explanation rather than legislation, re-examining the wage system of disease, dismissal protection system and disease relief system in our country, and then perfecting the income security system of workers in medical period in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D922.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王繼平;德國(guó)醫(yī)療保險(xiǎn)體制及其改革[J];德國(guó)研究;1998年03期

2 鄭尚元;;我國(guó)社會(huì)保險(xiǎn)制度歷史回眸與法制形成之展望[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2013年02期

3 言時(shí);;病假工資或疾病救濟(jì)費(fèi)有關(guān)政策解答[J];北京市計(jì)劃勞動(dòng)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

4 張曉陽(yáng);李巖;;企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任與勞動(dòng)者權(quán)益保障[J];吉林公安高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2010年06期

5 徐倩;李放;;財(cái)政社會(huì)保障支出與中國(guó)城鄉(xiāng)收入差距——理論分析與計(jì)量檢驗(yàn)[J];上海經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2012年11期

6 �；�;李強(qiáng);肖雪非;;完善病假管理制度[J];中國(guó)勞動(dòng);2010年06期

7 黎建飛;;解雇保護(hù):我國(guó)大陸與臺(tái)灣地區(qū)之比較研究[J];清華法學(xué);2010年05期

8 黎民;崔璐;;社會(huì)醫(yī)療保險(xiǎn)中的道德風(fēng)險(xiǎn)與費(fèi)用控制[J];人口與經(jīng)濟(jì);2007年04期

9 岳宗福,聶家華;國(guó)民政府社會(huì)保險(xiǎn)立法述論[J];山東農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年04期

10 郭士征;醫(yī)療保障及其國(guó)際比較[J];社會(huì)學(xué)研究;1994年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：2506147