包價旅游合同法律問題探討
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of tourism in China, the form of package tour is the most common in tourism activities. However, due to the lack of uniform tourism legislation and local laws and regulations in China, and the various new problems arising from economic growth, So that package tourism contract in legislation and practice has not been effectively resolved. Combined with the mature legislative experience of the relevant countries and regions, this paper focuses on the rights and obligations of the parties involved in the package price tourism contract, the terms of the package price tourism format and the liability of the tour operators for breach of contract. And put forward our country package price travel contract system consummation suggestion. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part introduces the basic theory of package-price tourism contract. At present, the theory of the legal nature of the contract of package price mainly includes the theory of contract, the theory of contract of sale and so on. Through the comparative analysis, it is concluded that none of the above theories can generalize all the characteristics of the contract of package price tourism. It is difficult to categorize the conclusion of the famous contract in the existing contract law. The second part analyzes the current situation of legislation and judicature in our country, and points out that the rights and obligations of the parties are not clear, the format of the package price travel contract is unfair and the travel operator's liability for breach of contract is lacking, etc. And analyze the manifestation of these problems and the reasons for their existence. The third part explores the rights and obligations of the parties to the package price tourism contract through the specific investigation of the legislation of Germany, Britain and other countries on the package price tourism contract. The legislative trend of regulating package price tourism format and the liability for breach of contract among tour operators and the advanced and mature legislative experience. The fourth part, perfect our country package price travel contract law ponder. In view of the main problems existing in the contract of package price tourism, some suggestions are put forward to clarify the rights and obligations of the parties, to regulate the contract of package price tourism format and to clarify the responsibility for breach of contract of tour operators.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:廣東商學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類號】:D923.6
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條
1 倪同木;夏萬宏;;違約非財產(chǎn)損害賠償問題研究——以《德國民法典》第253條之修改為中心[J];法學(xué)評論;2010年02期
2 哈斯巴根;周煒;;淺析旅游合同的概念及法律性質(zhì)[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下半月);2008年04期
3 彭莉;;不可抗力的淺析及其運用[J];廣東科技;2009年08期
4 沈小軍;;旅游合同中旅游營業(yè)人的界定[J];合肥學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2010年02期
5 孟凡哲;;西方國家旅游合同立法模式選擇及其借鑒[J];旅游學(xué)刊;2008年05期
6 周江洪;;旅游合同性質(zhì)決定之局限性探討——以日本的學(xué)說及裁判實踐為例[J];旅游學(xué)刊;2009年11期
7 黃健雄;韓榮和;;論赴臺旅游大陸居民的旅游者權(quán)利保障——以兩岸旅游合同范本比較為視角[J];旅游學(xué)刊;2010年08期
8 徐躍;日本的“新旅游法”及其思考[J];旅游學(xué)刊;1997年01期
9 鄭輝;;試析根本違約之合同目的落空[J];人民司法;2009年04期
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條
1 劉勁柳;[N];中國旅游報;2008年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 吳娜;旅游合同解除若干問題探討[D];中國政法大學(xué);2011年
2 姬慧萍;包價旅游合同研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2011年
3 鄭玉梅;旅游合同中的旅行社責(zé)任問題研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2005年
4 裴丙琦;旅游合同研究[D];河南大學(xué);2006年
5 魏求珍;旅游合同若干法律問題的研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2007年
6 鄒輝平;旅游合同有名化及其規(guī)制[D];西南政法大學(xué);2007年
7 梁飚;包價旅游合同變更與解除研究[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2007年
8 孔健;旅游合同中旅行社責(zé)任研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2007年
9 井惠;關(guān)于我國包價旅游旅行社民事責(zé)任初步研究[D];上海社會科學(xué)院;2008年
10 楊文;包價旅游合同研究[D];湘潭大學(xué);2008年
本文編號:2466527
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/2466527.html