發(fā)布時間：2018-12-25 15:39

【摘要】：《中華人民共和國合同法》及相關(guān)司法解釋創(chuàng)設(shè)了代位權(quán)人的直接受償權(quán)。該權(quán)利是以代位權(quán)人與次債務(wù)人存在直接的債之法律關(guān)系為前提條件的,從"代位"二字的法律內(nèi)涵、法律規(guī)范分析及立法目的諸角度考量,該前提條件的滿足是通過債權(quán)的法定讓與實(shí)現(xiàn)的。代位權(quán)人直接受償并不違背債權(quán)平等原則。代位權(quán)人直接受償權(quán)的確立,使得我國代位權(quán)制度之設(shè)計(jì)目的已不在于債之保全,而是為了達(dá)到直接清償代位權(quán)人的債權(quán)之法律效果。換言之,借助于債權(quán)的法定讓與,代位權(quán)已成為一種直接的債權(quán)回收手段。
[Abstract]:The contract Law of the people's Republic of China and related judicial interpretations create the right of direct compensation of the subrogation. This right is based on the legal relationship between the subrogation and the secondary debtor. It is considered from the perspective of the legal connotation of the word "subrogation", the analysis of legal norms and the purpose of legislation. The satisfaction of the precondition is realized through the legal assignment of the creditor's rights. The right of subrogation is not in violation of the principle of equality of creditor's rights. The establishment of the right of subrogation makes the design of the system of subrogation in our country not to preserve the debt, but to achieve the legal effect of paying off the creditor's rights directly. In other words, subrogation has become a direct means of debt recovery.
【作者單位】： 東北大學(xué)文法學(xué)院;贛南師范學(xué)院法學(xué)系;
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 孫積祿;保險代位權(quán)研究[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2003年03期

2 李h，

本文編號：2391313