論合同解除后違約金條款的適用
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-12-24 09:22
【摘要】：合同解除后，非違約方是否能根據(jù)原合同主張適用違約金條款，我國(guó)《合同法》并沒(méi)有給出明顯的答案，這也導(dǎo)致了理論界和實(shí)務(wù)界對(duì)該問(wèn)題存在較大的爭(zhēng)議。事實(shí)上，在司法實(shí)踐中，也確實(shí)存在就完全相同性質(zhì)案件作出截然不同判決的現(xiàn)象，即有的案件判令適用合同違約金條款，有的則判令不適用。本文首先從兩則法院經(jīng)典案例入手，分析我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐和理論界對(duì)該問(wèn)題的不同觀點(diǎn)及立法缺陷，，并在比較兩大法系國(guó)家和國(guó)際公約有關(guān)違約金制度的基礎(chǔ)上認(rèn)為，除法律有特別規(guī)定外，一般情形下，合同解除后都能適用違約金條款。最后，本文對(duì)我國(guó)合同解除后違約金條款適用的法律制度完善提出一些建議。
[Abstract]:After the termination of the contract, whether the non-defaulting party can apply the liquidated damages clause according to the original contract, China's contract Law has not given an obvious answer, which also led to the theoretical and practical circles of this issue has a greater controversy. In fact, in judicial practice, there is a very different kind of judgment in cases of exactly the same nature, that is, some cases order the application of contract liquidated damages, and others do not. This article begins with two classic court cases, analyzes the different viewpoints and legislative defects of the judicial practice and theoretical circle of our country on this issue, and on the basis of comparing the two legal system countries and the international conventions about the system of penalty for breach of contract. Unless the law has special provisions, generally, after the termination of the contract can be applied to the liquidated damages clause. Finally, this paper puts forward some suggestions on the perfection of the legal system applicable to the liquidated damages clause after the termination of the contract in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D923.6
[Abstract]:After the termination of the contract, whether the non-defaulting party can apply the liquidated damages clause according to the original contract, China's contract Law has not given an obvious answer, which also led to the theoretical and practical circles of this issue has a greater controversy. In fact, in judicial practice, there is a very different kind of judgment in cases of exactly the same nature, that is, some cases order the application of contract liquidated damages, and others do not. This article begins with two classic court cases, analyzes the different viewpoints and legislative defects of the judicial practice and theoretical circle of our country on this issue, and on the basis of comparing the two legal system countries and the international conventions about the system of penalty for breach of contract. Unless the law has special provisions, generally, after the termination of the contract can be applied to the liquidated damages clause. Finally, this paper puts forward some suggestions on the perfection of the legal system applicable to the liquidated damages clause after the termination of the contract in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D923.6
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條
1 郭丹云;各國(guó)立法上違約金性質(zhì)比較研究[J];河北法學(xué);2005年06期
2 韓世遠(yuǎn);違約金散考[J];清華大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年04期
3 薛孝東;合同解除的標(biāo)的新論[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期
4 寧踢坡;合同解除溯及力探討——兼論合同終止[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2003年08期
5 高蘋;;合同解除后的損害賠償問(wèn)題淺析[J];法學(xué)雜志;2006年01期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條
1 譚瑞明;論違約金與意思自治的關(guān)系[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2007年
2 馬俐霞;論意思自治原則的價(jià)值性與實(shí)踐[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2005年
3 許亮;違約金爭(zhēng)議問(wèn)題研究[D];北京大學(xué);2005年
4 辛群;合同解除的法律效果研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2007年
5 劉p
本文編號(hào)：2390451
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/2390451.html
最近更新
教材專著
