【摘要】：當(dāng)前，債權(quán)讓與在日常交易和企業(yè)的經(jīng)濟(jì)往來(lái)中普遍存在，尤其是在金融機(jī)構(gòu)的不良債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓中產(chǎn)生的影響更為深刻。債權(quán)讓與作為財(cái)富流轉(zhuǎn)的一種重要形態(tài)，影響著交易主體之間的不同利益和交易安全，尤其是在現(xiàn)實(shí)生活中出現(xiàn)了許多債權(quán)讓與權(quán)利瑕疵的實(shí)例，債權(quán)受讓人的權(quán)利遭受損害而債權(quán)讓與人的權(quán)利瑕疵擔(dān)保責(zé)任在法律上處于空白地帶，這引發(fā)了理論界和實(shí)務(wù)界的關(guān)注。 一方面，理論界主要是圍繞買賣合同中的權(quán)利瑕疵擔(dān)保責(zé)任而展開(kāi)的，形成了較多的理論研究成果，但就債權(quán)讓與人權(quán)利瑕疵擔(dān)保責(zé)任而言，理論界的關(guān)注和研究都非常薄弱，甚至可以說(shuō)處于空白狀態(tài)，并且我國(guó)當(dāng)前民事立法對(duì)此未作規(guī)定，構(gòu)成明顯的立法漏洞，給理論研究者提出了新的課題。另一方面，，現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì)中出現(xiàn)了較多因債權(quán)讓與權(quán)利瑕疵致使受讓人合法權(quán)益受損而救濟(jì)無(wú)門的實(shí)例，嚴(yán)重影響了債權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)速度和交易安全，這使得對(duì)債權(quán)讓與人權(quán)利瑕疵擔(dān)保責(zé)任課題的研究顯得十分必要，且具有現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。 首先，本文闡述了選題背景與意義，梳理了研究該主題已有的文獻(xiàn)，形成文獻(xiàn)綜述，介紹當(dāng)前理論研究狀況，揭示本文主題的研究意義所在。其次，對(duì)債權(quán)讓與人權(quán)利瑕疵擔(dān)保責(zé)任的基本理論進(jìn)行梳理，主要包括債權(quán)讓與人權(quán)利瑕疵擔(dān)保責(zé)任的概念、擔(dān)保范圍、要件。再次，主要參考了大陸法系德國(guó)、法國(guó)、日本，英美法系英美兩國(guó)和《聯(lián)合國(guó)應(yīng)收賬款轉(zhuǎn)讓公約》中的有關(guān)規(guī)定，通過(guò)運(yùn)用歸納和對(duì)比的方法，對(duì)上述規(guī)定中涉及到債權(quán)讓與人權(quán)利瑕疵擔(dān)保責(zé)任的條款和內(nèi)容進(jìn)行了分析，為我國(guó)構(gòu)建債權(quán)讓與人權(quán)利瑕疵擔(dān)保責(zé)任制度提供借鑒。最后，深入探討我國(guó)《合同法》的有關(guān)規(guī)定，揭示我國(guó)現(xiàn)有立法中對(duì)債權(quán)讓與人權(quán)利瑕疵擔(dān)保責(zé)任的立法空白；分析我國(guó)實(shí)踐中出現(xiàn)的債權(quán)讓與人權(quán)利瑕疵擔(dān)保責(zé)任的有關(guān)實(shí)例，結(jié)合前文的理論研究，針對(duì)債權(quán)讓與人權(quán)利瑕疵擔(dān)保責(zé)任的構(gòu)建提出了一些具體的建議。
[Abstract]:At present, the transfer of creditor's rights is widespread in daily transactions and economic exchanges of enterprises, especially in the transfer of non-performing debts of financial institutions. As an important form of wealth circulation, creditor's rights transfer affects the different interests and transaction security among the trading subjects, especially in the real life, there are many examples of the defect of the right to transfer the creditor's rights. The rights of the transferee of creditor's rights are damaged and the guaranty liability of the creditor's right defect is in the blank zone in law, which has aroused the attention of the theorists and the practitioners. On the one hand, the theoretical circle mainly revolves around the right flaw guarantee responsibility in the contract of sale and purchase, which has formed more theoretical research results, but the theory circle is very weak in the aspect of the creditor's right transferor's right flaw guarantee liability. It can even be said that it is in a blank state, and the current civil legislation of our country does not make provision for this, which constitutes an obvious legislative loophole, and puts forward a new subject to the theoretical researchers. On the other hand, in the real society, there are many cases where the transferee's legitimate rights and interests are damaged due to the defect of the assignment of the creditor's rights, which seriously affects the speed of the creditor's rights circulation and the safety of the transaction. This makes it necessary and practical to study the subject of imperfections of creditor's rights. First of all, this paper expounds the background and significance of the topic, combs the existing literature on the subject, forms a literature review, introduces the current theoretical research situation, and reveals the significance of this theme. Secondly, the author sorts out the basic theory of guaranty liability of creditor's right transferor's right defect, mainly includes the concept, scope and elements of creditor's right transferor's right defect guarantee liability. Thirdly, mainly referring to the relevant provisions of the Continental Law system Germany, France, Japan, Anglo-American Law system and the United Nations Convention on the assignment of accounts Receivable, by using the method of induction and comparison, This paper analyzes the provisions and contents of the above provisions concerning the liability of guaranty for the defect of the right of the transferor of the creditor's rights, which provides a reference for the construction of the system of guaranty liability for the defect of the right of the transferor of the creditor's right in our country. Finally, the author deeply discusses the relevant provisions of contract Law of our country, and reveals the legislative blank in the existing legislation of our country concerning the liability of guaranty for the defect of the rights of the transferor of the creditor's rights. Based on the analysis of the relevant examples of the liability of guaranty for the defect of the right of the transferor of the creditor's rights in our country, this paper puts forward some concrete suggestions on the construction of the liability of the guaranty for the defect of the right of the transferor of the creditor's right in the light of the previous theoretical research.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D923.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 李偉;;德國(guó)法出賣人瑕疵擔(dān)保責(zé)任的發(fā)展及對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示[J];同濟(jì)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 王紅良;論債權(quán)讓與的效力[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年

2 劉繼紅;權(quán)利瑕疵擔(dān)保制度研究——尋求制度設(shè)計(jì)的合諧[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2001年

3 林浴虹;債權(quán)讓與制度及其發(fā)展[D];山東大學(xué);2005年

4 曹彥;債權(quán)讓與法律問(wèn)題研究[D];湘潭大學(xué);2006年

5 常宏;債權(quán)讓與研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2006年

6 李文婷;債權(quán)讓與中的交易安全問(wèn)題研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2009年

本文編號(hào)：2333250