【摘要】：當前，極速增加的機動車數(shù)量，促使交通事故頻發(fā)，成為社會不穩(wěn)定的因素之一。由于普通民眾的交通安全意識、道路交通秩序相對滯后，致使道路交通事故大幅增加、案件數(shù)量顯著增長。根據(jù)法院報表統(tǒng)計顯示，我2007年法院系統(tǒng)受理一審機動車道路交通事故損害賠償糾紛案件296969件，占民事一審案件的6.3%；2008年受理375082件，占民事一審案件的6.9%；2009年受理464703件，占民事一審案件的8.0%；2010年受理612596件，占民事一審案件的10.1%；2011年受理744570件，占民事一審案件的11.3%；2012年上半年，案件數(shù)量更是達到了403476件。無論從絕對數(shù)量還是所占比例上看，機動車道路交通事故損害賠償糾紛案件都處于較快上升趨勢。如何有效解決社會矛盾、促進社會的和諧與穩(wěn)定、及時保護事故受害者的合法權(quán)益、彰顯法律的公正與威嚴，是擺在人民法院在面前的現(xiàn)實問題。在頒布了《中華人民共和國保險法》、《中華人民共和國道路交通安全法》、《機動車交通事故責任強制保險條例》后，關(guān)于是否賦予了受害第三人直接請求權(quán)在理論和實務中爭議不斷。為貫徹黨的十八大提出的五位一體的重大戰(zhàn)略部署，切實保障和改善民生，加快形成法治保障的社會管理體制，為全面建成小康社會提供有力的司法保障，最高人民法院根據(jù)《中華人民共和國侵權(quán)責任法》、《中華人民共和國合同法》、《中華人民共和國道路交通安全法》、《中華人民共和國保險法》、《中華人民共和國民事訴訟法》等法律的相關(guān)規(guī)定，結(jié)合審判實踐，經(jīng)審判委員會第1556次會議討論，，通過了《最高人民法院關(guān)于審理道路交通事故損害賠償案件適用法律若干問題的解釋》，此解釋解決了全國各地法院在審理機動車道路交通事故的案件時，將肇事機動車輛承保的保險公司列為何種訴訟地位。投保人與保險公司可以在保險合同中約定受害第三人享有直接請求權(quán)，但本文探討的是由法律設定產(chǎn)生的受害第三人直接請求權(quán)，也就是法律賦予的直接請求權(quán)。
[Abstract]:At present, the rapid increase in the number of motor vehicles, promote frequent traffic accidents, become one of the factors of social instability. Because of the common people's awareness of traffic safety, the road traffic order lags behind, resulting in a large increase in road traffic accidents and a significant increase in the number of cases. According to the statistics of the court reports, in 2007, the court system accepted 296969 disputes over compensation for damages caused by motor vehicle traffic accidents in the first instance, accounting for 6.3 percent of the civil first instance cases; in 2008, 375082 cases were accepted, accounting for 6.9 percent of the civil first instance cases; and in 2009, 464703 cases were accepted. In 2010, 612596 cases were accepted, accounting for 10.1% of the total number of civil first instance cases; 744570 cases were accepted in 2011, accounting for 11.33% of the total number of civil first instance cases; and in the first half of 2012, the number of cases reached 403476. In terms of absolute number and proportion, the dispute cases of motor vehicle road traffic accident damage compensation are on the rise. How to effectively solve social contradictions, promote social harmony and stability, protect the legitimate rights and interests of accident victims in time, and highlight the justice and majesty of the law are the realistic problems in front of the people's court. After the promulgation of the Insurance Law of the people's Republic of China, the Road Traffic Safety Law of the people's Republic of China and the regulations on compulsory Insurance for Motor vehicle Traffic Accidents, Whether the right of direct claim is given to the third party is controversial in theory and practice. In order to implement the major strategic plan of "five in one" put forward by the 18th National Congress of the Party, to ensure and improve the people's livelihood, to speed up the formation of a social management system guaranteed by the rule of law, and to provide a strong judicial guarantee for the building of a well-off society in an all-round way, The Supreme people's Court, in accordance with the Law of the people's Republic of China on Tort liability, the contract Law of the people's Republic of China, the Road Traffic Safety Law of the people's Republic of China, the Insurance Law of the people's Republic of China, the Civil procedure of the people's Republic of China The relevant provisions of laws, such as laws, In connection with trial practice, discussed at the 1556 meeting of the trial Committee, The Supreme people's Court has adopted the interpretation of the Law applicable to hearing cases of compensation for damages caused by Road Traffic Accidents. This interpretation has solved the problems of courts throughout the country in hearing cases of road traffic accidents involving motor vehicles. What kind of litigation status will the insurance company insured by the motor vehicle involved in the accident be listed as? The policyholder and the insurance company can agree in the insurance contract that the injured third party has the direct claim right, but this article discusses the direct claim right of the injured third party produced by the law, that is, the direct claim right given by the law.
【學位授予單位】：黑龍江大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D922.284

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 唐松青;;機動車責任保險第三人直接請求權(quán)問題研究[J];湖南社會科學;2007年03期

2 鄭沖;;德國機動車民事責任之規(guī)定及其對我國立法的借鑒[J];法學雜志;2007年01期

3 李理;論強制機動車責任保險法的受害人直接請求權(quán)[J];貴州民族學院學報(哲學社會科學版);2005年04期

4 張麗娟;論強制機動車責任保險中受害人的直接請求權(quán)[J];山西高等學校社會科學學報;2004年09期

5 劉曉紅;機動車責任保險若干法律問題探討[J];學術(shù)論壇;2002年04期

6 李青武;;透視“歐盟汽車責任保險指令”對受害人的保護——五次階段性發(fā)展及其啟示[J];中國社會科學院研究生院學報;2007年02期

本文編號：2286961