合同撤銷與履行利益賠償
發(fā)布時間：2018-10-13 19:25
【摘要】：針對合同撤銷與履行利益賠償可否并存,德國法上存在正反兩說。對這一命題的證成,"雙重效果"理論并非妥適的依據。應基于與解除合同的"相似性",在撤銷合同的效果上作等同評價。針對惡意隱瞞標的物品質情形,基于兩項缺陷的存在及請求權的相互影響,賠償履行利益具有正當性。請求權基礎應為合同法相關規(guī)范,謹防侵權法的滲入。在我國,評價重心并非合同存在與否,而是違約行為的發(fā)生。在規(guī)范層面,具有支持撤銷合同之后賠償履行利益的現實可能。裁判實務雖然尚未有所突破,但應對學理進行吸收借鑒。除了惡意欺詐之外,此命題可拓展適用于重大誤解,但不適用于脅迫、乘人之危和顯失公平的情形。
[Abstract]:There are both positive and negative theories in German law on whether contract rescission and performance benefit compensation can coexist. To prove this proposition, the theory of "double effect" is not an appropriate basis. The effect of rescission should be evaluated on the basis of the similarity between the contract and the rescission. Based on the existence of two defects and the mutual influence of the right of claim, the interests of compensation performance are justified in the case of malicious concealment of the quality of the subject matter. The basis of the right of claim should be the relevant norms of contract law and guard against the infiltration of tort law. In our country, the focus of evaluation is not the existence of contract, but the occurrence of breach of contract. At the normative level, there is a realistic possibility to support the interests of compensation and performance after rescission of the contract. Although the referee practice has not yet made a breakthrough, it should be absorbed and used for reference. In addition to malicious fraud, this proposition can be extended to major misunderstandings, but not to situations of coercion, taking advantage of danger and manifestly unfair.
【作者單位】： 南京大學法學院;
【基金】：國家社會科學基金青年項目(16CFX055)
【分類號】：D923.6
[Abstract]:There are both positive and negative theories in German law on whether contract rescission and performance benefit compensation can coexist. To prove this proposition, the theory of "double effect" is not an appropriate basis. The effect of rescission should be evaluated on the basis of the similarity between the contract and the rescission. Based on the existence of two defects and the mutual influence of the right of claim, the interests of compensation performance are justified in the case of malicious concealment of the quality of the subject matter. The basis of the right of claim should be the relevant norms of contract law and guard against the infiltration of tort law. In our country, the focus of evaluation is not the existence of contract, but the occurrence of breach of contract. At the normative level, there is a realistic possibility to support the interests of compensation and performance after rescission of the contract. Although the referee practice has not yet made a breakthrough, it should be absorbed and used for reference. In addition to malicious fraud, this proposition can be extended to major misunderstandings, but not to situations of coercion, taking advantage of danger and manifestly unfair.
【作者單位】： 南京大學法學院;
【基金】：國家社會科學基金青年項目(16CFX055)
【分類號】：D923.6
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 許冰梅;合同解除中的法律問題[J];中國律師;2000年08期
2 段超;簡析合同解除的特點、條件和方式[J];中共青島市委黨校.青島行政學院學報;2001年06期
3 詹恒清;合同解除制度有關問題探討[J];中南民族學院學報(人文社會科學版);2002年S1期
4 欒志紅;關于繼續(xù)性合同的幾個問題[J];法學論壇;2002年05期
5 王春平;;這個租用合同可解除嗎[J];農村新技術;2008年11期
6 張諾諾;;合同解除的價值目標[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學院學報;2010年03期
7 孟繼超;;我國合同解除制度探討[J];哈爾濱學院學報;2011年04期
8 遲麗華;李盈霏;;合同監(jiān)管過程中的主要風險及防范對策研究[J];生產力研究;2012年11期
9 劉瑞華;;關于合同解除的幾個問題[J];學習與研究;1989年01期
10 王U，
本文編號：2269662
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/2269662.html
