競業(yè)限制協(xié)議效力研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-09-06 17:01
【摘要】：企業(yè)之間競爭的核心在于人才的競爭，誰擁有足夠優(yōu)秀的人才就能夠在眾多競爭者中立于不敗之地。然而，跳槽現(xiàn)象的不斷發(fā)生，人才流動的加劇，用人單位為了保護(hù)自己的商業(yè)秘密等信息不被因此泄露，往往與員工簽訂競業(yè)限制協(xié)議。競業(yè)限制協(xié)議是競業(yè)限制的基礎(chǔ)，但其即使是用人單位與勞動者意思表示一致的結(jié)果，也難免出現(xiàn)用人單位利用自身優(yōu)勢強(qiáng)迫勞動者簽訂之嫌。如果離職后的勞動者負(fù)擔(dān)競業(yè)限制義務(wù)，可能無法活用其原本所熟悉的知識或者技能以謀生，給其憲法上所賦予的勞動者自由擇業(yè)的權(quán)利甚至是生存權(quán)帶來侵害。因此本文主要探討《勞動合同法》語境下的競業(yè)限制，著重涉及勞動者離職后的競業(yè)行為。 競業(yè)限制協(xié)議的有效與否更是直接關(guān)系到用人單位商業(yè)秘密的保護(hù)以及對勞動者就業(yè)權(quán)、生存權(quán)的限制。我國對于競業(yè)限制制度的研究起步較晚，針對競業(yè)限制協(xié)議效力問題的法律法規(guī)極不完善，相關(guān)理論未能達(dá)成統(tǒng)一的認(rèn)識，2013年2月最高人民法院《關(guān)于審理勞動爭議案件適用法律若干問題的解釋（四）》中也僅涉及競業(yè)限制協(xié)議的部分內(nèi)容，具體規(guī)定尚存在缺陷，導(dǎo)致司法實踐中諸多問題。因此，有必要對競業(yè)限制協(xié)議的效力進(jìn)行研究。競業(yè)限制協(xié)議的法律效力是完全依據(jù)契約自由的原則充分尊重當(dāng)事人合意即可，還是需要由法律設(shè)定一定的限制，而怎樣才是合理化的限制，才能使其真正實現(xiàn)公平公正的目標(biāo)，更是我們要研究的問題。 本文分為五個部分: 在第一部分，以競業(yè)限制的概念、分類為基礎(chǔ)，分析競業(yè)限制協(xié)議的特點(diǎn)、性質(zhì)，為競業(yè)限制協(xié)議的效力分析作鋪墊。 在第二部分，從最初競業(yè)限制協(xié)議的效力之爭論出發(fā)，探討承認(rèn)競業(yè)限制協(xié)議有效存在的理論基礎(chǔ)，具體包括契約自由原則，利益平衡原則、誠信原則。三原則相互結(jié)合、不斷修正，反映出競業(yè)限制協(xié)議理論的形成過程。 第三部分介紹我國目前競業(yè)限制協(xié)議效力之相關(guān)法律、地方性法規(guī)、部門規(guī)章、司法解釋等規(guī)定，，指出我國競業(yè)限制協(xié)議效力的有關(guān)立法中存在的漏洞，通過典型案例的分析、法院的裁判結(jié)果，分析目前司法實踐中對于競業(yè)限制協(xié)議效力之認(rèn)識。 第四部分結(jié)合國外先進(jìn)立法，將影響競業(yè)限制協(xié)議效力之主要因素單獨(dú)加以探討，在國外，對于競業(yè)限制協(xié)議的效力，除了美國一些州持根本性的否定態(tài)度之外，絕大多數(shù)國家（地區(qū)）均認(rèn)為其有適用的基礎(chǔ)，但在具體約定時需有合理的限制，只是在影響效力的各因素中有所差異，主要涉及“適用主體、協(xié)議形式、用人單位可保護(hù)利益、離職原因、經(jīng)濟(jì)補(bǔ)償、期限地域行業(yè)范圍”，評析影響競業(yè)限制協(xié)議效力之標(biāo)準(zhǔn)及生效要件，是本文之重點(diǎn)所在。 第五部分則結(jié)合我國立法及司法實踐，對影響競業(yè)限制協(xié)議效力之因素進(jìn)行分類，提出競業(yè)限制協(xié)議效力的審查標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，歸納出競業(yè)限制協(xié)議合法有效之要件，對不影響競業(yè)限制協(xié)議效力的各因素進(jìn)行合理化調(diào)整，以完善我國競業(yè)限制之立法規(guī)定。
[Abstract]:The core of competition among enterprises lies in the competition of talents, who has enough excellent talents can be invincible in many competitors. However, job-hopping phenomenon occurs constantly, the flow of talents is intensifying, employers often sign a non-competition agreement with employees in order to protect their business secrets and other information from being disclosed. The agreement of non-competition restriction is the basis of non-competition restriction, but even if the employer agrees with the laborer's intention, it will inevitably lead to the suspicion that the employer forces the laborer to sign the agreement by using its own advantages. Therefore, this paper mainly discusses the restriction of competition in the context of the Labor Contract Law, and focuses on the competition behavior of workers after leaving their jobs.
The validity of the non-competition agreement is directly related to the protection of employers'trade secrets and the restriction of workers' employment rights and survival rights.The research on the non-competition agreement started late in China.The laws and regulations on the effectiveness of the non-competition agreement are very imperfect and the relevant theories have not reached a unified understanding. The Supreme People's Court's Interpretation of Several Questions Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Labor Dispute Cases (4) only deals with some of the contents of the non-competition agreement, and there are still some defects in the specific provisions, which lead to many problems in judicial practice. Therefore, it is necessary to study the validity of the non-competition agreement. According to the principle of freedom of contract, we should fully respect the parties'consent, or should we set certain restrictions by law, and how to rationalize the restrictions in order to achieve the goal of fairness and justice is a question we should study.
This article is divided into five parts.
In the first part, based on the concept and classification of competition restriction, the characteristics and nature of competition restriction agreement are analyzed, which paves the way for the effectiveness analysis of competition restriction agreement.
In the second part, starting from the controversy over the validity of the original non-competition agreement, the author discusses the theoretical basis of admitting the validity of the non-competition agreement, including the principle of freedom of contract, the principle of balance of interests, and the principle of good faith.
The third part introduces the relevant laws, local regulations, departmental regulations and judicial interpretation of the validity of the non-competition agreement in China, points out the loopholes in the legislation of the non-competition agreement validity in China, and analyzes the effectiveness of the non-competition agreement in the current judicial practice through the analysis of typical cases and the judgment results of the court. Understanding.
The fourth part discusses the main factors that affect the validity of the non-competition agreement separately with the advanced legislation of foreign countries. In foreign countries, most countries (regions) think that the non-competition agreement has the applicable basis except some states in the United States hold a fundamental negative attitude toward its validity, but it needs to be reasonable and limited in the specific agreement. However, there are some differences in the factors affecting the validity of the agreement, mainly involving "the subject of application, the form of agreement, the employer's protection of interests, the reasons for resignation, economic compensation, the time limit of the geographical and industrial scope". It is the focus of this paper to evaluate the criteria and the effective elements of the agreement affecting the validity of the non-competition restriction.
The fifth part classifies the factors that affect the validity of the non-competition agreement according to the legislation and judicial practice of our country, puts forward the criteria for examining the validity of the non-competition agreement, sums up the requirements for its validity and rationalizes the factors that do not affect the validity of the non-competition agreement so as to perfect the non-competition agreement in our country. Legislative provisions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D922.52
本文編號：2226984
[Abstract]:The core of competition among enterprises lies in the competition of talents, who has enough excellent talents can be invincible in many competitors. However, job-hopping phenomenon occurs constantly, the flow of talents is intensifying, employers often sign a non-competition agreement with employees in order to protect their business secrets and other information from being disclosed. The agreement of non-competition restriction is the basis of non-competition restriction, but even if the employer agrees with the laborer's intention, it will inevitably lead to the suspicion that the employer forces the laborer to sign the agreement by using its own advantages. Therefore, this paper mainly discusses the restriction of competition in the context of the Labor Contract Law, and focuses on the competition behavior of workers after leaving their jobs.
The validity of the non-competition agreement is directly related to the protection of employers'trade secrets and the restriction of workers' employment rights and survival rights.The research on the non-competition agreement started late in China.The laws and regulations on the effectiveness of the non-competition agreement are very imperfect and the relevant theories have not reached a unified understanding. The Supreme People's Court's Interpretation of Several Questions Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Labor Dispute Cases (4) only deals with some of the contents of the non-competition agreement, and there are still some defects in the specific provisions, which lead to many problems in judicial practice. Therefore, it is necessary to study the validity of the non-competition agreement. According to the principle of freedom of contract, we should fully respect the parties'consent, or should we set certain restrictions by law, and how to rationalize the restrictions in order to achieve the goal of fairness and justice is a question we should study.
This article is divided into five parts.
In the first part, based on the concept and classification of competition restriction, the characteristics and nature of competition restriction agreement are analyzed, which paves the way for the effectiveness analysis of competition restriction agreement.
In the second part, starting from the controversy over the validity of the original non-competition agreement, the author discusses the theoretical basis of admitting the validity of the non-competition agreement, including the principle of freedom of contract, the principle of balance of interests, and the principle of good faith.
The third part introduces the relevant laws, local regulations, departmental regulations and judicial interpretation of the validity of the non-competition agreement in China, points out the loopholes in the legislation of the non-competition agreement validity in China, and analyzes the effectiveness of the non-competition agreement in the current judicial practice through the analysis of typical cases and the judgment results of the court. Understanding.
The fourth part discusses the main factors that affect the validity of the non-competition agreement separately with the advanced legislation of foreign countries. In foreign countries, most countries (regions) think that the non-competition agreement has the applicable basis except some states in the United States hold a fundamental negative attitude toward its validity, but it needs to be reasonable and limited in the specific agreement. However, there are some differences in the factors affecting the validity of the agreement, mainly involving "the subject of application, the form of agreement, the employer's protection of interests, the reasons for resignation, economic compensation, the time limit of the geographical and industrial scope". It is the focus of this paper to evaluate the criteria and the effective elements of the agreement affecting the validity of the non-competition restriction.
The fifth part classifies the factors that affect the validity of the non-competition agreement according to the legislation and judicial practice of our country, puts forward the criteria for examining the validity of the non-competition agreement, sums up the requirements for its validity and rationalizes the factors that do not affect the validity of the non-competition agreement so as to perfect the non-competition agreement in our country. Legislative provisions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D922.52
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 葉靜漪;任學(xué)敏;;我國競業(yè)限制制度的構(gòu)建[J];法學(xué)雜志;2006年04期
2 鄭愛青;;從英法勞動法判例看勞動法上的忠實義務(wù)與競業(yè)限制條款——對我國《勞動合同法》規(guī)范競業(yè)限制行為的思考和建議[J];法學(xué)家;2006年02期
3 王飛;忠誠義務(wù)與競業(yè)禁止[J];法學(xué);2000年02期
4 許明月;袁文全;;離職競業(yè)禁止的理論基礎(chǔ)與制度設(shè)計[J];法學(xué);2007年04期
5 董保華;;由競業(yè)限制經(jīng)濟(jì)補(bǔ)償爭鳴引發(fā)的思考——兼與葉靜漪教授商榷[J];法學(xué);2010年10期
6 施卓南;;競業(yè)限制的問題與對策研究[J];法制與社會;2012年08期
7 馬蓉蓉;;離職競業(yè)禁止的合理性研究[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2007年03期
8 夏虹;;略論競業(yè)禁止的法律規(guī)制——商業(yè)秘密權(quán)與勞動權(quán)保護(hù)之平衡[J];科技創(chuàng)業(yè)月刊;2009年01期
9 李永明;競業(yè)禁止的若干問題[J];法學(xué)研究;2002年05期
10 徐敬云;離職后競業(yè)禁止協(xié)議效力的分析[J];中國勞動;2002年12期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 徐陽;勞動權(quán)保障視域下的競業(yè)禁止法律制度研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年
本文編號：2226984
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/2226984.html
