【摘要】：基于債權(quán)作為財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)所具有可轉(zhuǎn)讓性,債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓指的是在保持債權(quán)統(tǒng)一性的前提下,對(duì)債權(quán)人進(jìn)行變更的的法律事實(shí),它可依照法律規(guī)定發(fā)生,也可因法律事實(shí)發(fā)生。我國(guó)的《合同法》在第80條做出規(guī)定:“債權(quán)人轉(zhuǎn)讓權(quán)利的,應(yīng)當(dāng)通知債務(wù)人。未經(jīng)通知,該轉(zhuǎn)讓對(duì)債務(wù)人不發(fā)生效力。”,該法條強(qiáng)調(diào)了未通知該轉(zhuǎn)讓對(duì)債務(wù)人不發(fā)生效力,卻沒(méi)說(shuō)債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓通知行為本身的性質(zhì),有義務(wù)做出通知的主體,通知行為的具體形式和內(nèi)容以及通知行為對(duì)債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同的影響等等諸多與通知行為相關(guān)的問(wèn)題,國(guó)內(nèi)的理論研究與司法實(shí)踐中均存在諸多爭(zhēng)議,目前在我國(guó)學(xué)者們也沒(méi)有就相關(guān)于債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓通知問(wèn)題形成統(tǒng)一的口徑。簡(jiǎn)單的立法不能滿足法律應(yīng)對(duì)和處置社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)生活中復(fù)雜多變的情況的需要,深入細(xì)致的研究分析總結(jié)對(duì)于規(guī)范債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓通知這一法律行為具有非常重要的意義,本文中,筆者先將生活中一有關(guān)于債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓通知行為不規(guī)范引發(fā)的糾紛的一個(gè)典型案例作了簡(jiǎn)單說(shuō)明解釋,引出需要討論的問(wèn)題,提煉出生活中爭(zhēng)議的焦點(diǎn),由此展開對(duì)債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓通知行為的全面分析。筆者從立法原意出發(fā),從文義解釋的方法入手,首先對(duì)債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓及債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓通知行為進(jìn)行闡釋,對(duì)目前國(guó)內(nèi)存在的學(xué)術(shù)觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行了提煉和簡(jiǎn)單的比較,接著就通知行為在學(xué)理上進(jìn)行深入分析,從主體,內(nèi)容形式,做出的時(shí)間和行為性質(zhì),包括生活實(shí)踐中存在的特殊例外進(jìn)行了全面總結(jié)陳述,比較完整地呈現(xiàn)了債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓通知在法律上的效力。接著,從國(guó)內(nèi)外相關(guān)理論研究進(jìn)行總結(jié)比較,從中找出與我國(guó)實(shí)踐相契合的合理立法,為我國(guó)應(yīng)對(duì)糾紛提供好的思路和借鑒。下面就我國(guó)的立法現(xiàn)狀和實(shí)踐現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了簡(jiǎn)單的總結(jié)描述,最后在我國(guó)不足的部分進(jìn)行了簡(jiǎn)單的總結(jié)分析,并在總結(jié)以上優(yōu)秀的基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)以后的立法提出些想法。
[Abstract]:Based on the transferability of creditor's rights as property rights, the assignment of creditor's rights refers to the legal fact that the creditor can be changed under the premise of maintaining the unity of the creditor's rights, which can occur according to the law, or because of the legal facts. The contract Law of our country stipulates in Article 80: "where the creditor transfers the right, the debtor shall be notified." Without notice, the assignment does not have effect on the debtor. "the law emphasizes that the assignment is ineffective against the debtor without notice, but does not say the nature of the act of notification of the assignment of the creditor's rights and the subject of the obligation to notify, The concrete form and content of the act of notification, the influence of the act of notification on the contract of assignment of creditor's rights, and so on, are all controversial in the theoretical research and judicial practice. At present, scholars in our country have not formed a unified caliber on the issue of notice of assignment of creditor's rights. Simple legislation can not meet the needs of the law to deal with the complex and changeable situations in the social and economic life. It is of great significance to standardize the legal act of transferring the creditor's rights by studying, analyzing and summing up deeply and meticulously. In this paper, The author explains a typical case of the dispute caused by the non-standard behavior of creditor's rights transfer notice in life, leads to the problems that need to be discussed, and abstracts the focus of the dispute in life. From this, the comprehensive analysis of the act of notification of assignment of creditor's rights is carried out. Starting from the legislative intent and the method of interpretation, the author first explains the assignment of creditor's rights and the act of notifying the transfer of creditor's rights, and refines and makes a simple comparison of the academic viewpoints existing in China at present. Then, it makes a thorough analysis on the theory of notification behavior, and summarizes the subject, the form of content, the time and nature of the behavior made, including the special exceptions in life practice. It completely presents the legal effect of the notice of assignment of creditor's rights. Then, this paper summarizes and compares the relevant theoretical studies at home and abroad, and finds out the reasonable legislation which accords with the practice of our country, and provides a good way of thinking and reference for our country to deal with disputes. The following is a brief summary and description of the current situation of legislation and practice in our country. Finally, the author makes a brief summary and analysis in the insufficient part of our country, and puts forward some ideas for the future legislation on the basis of summarizing the above excellent.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D923.6

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 朱軍;;淺談債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓的法律問(wèn)題[J];商業(yè)文化(學(xué)術(shù)版);2009年04期

2 李錚;;應(yīng)注意防范債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓過(guò)程中的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)[J];產(chǎn)權(quán)導(dǎo)刊;2012年09期

3 楊永強(qiáng);王經(jīng)偉;;農(nóng)發(fā)行不良貸款債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓的法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)[J];農(nóng)業(yè)發(fā)展與金融;2014年02期

4 祁立民;;債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓 應(yīng)先抵他人到期債務(wù)[J];現(xiàn)代營(yíng)銷;2001年12期

5 尹長(zhǎng)海;債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓之我見[J];湘潭師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年02期

6 施漢嶸;析債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓若干法律問(wèn)題[J];法律適用;2003年07期

7 劉常云;政策性貸款債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓不具法律效力[J];中國(guó)合作經(jīng)濟(jì);2004年12期

8 陽(yáng)朝鋒;債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓通知性質(zhì)辨——與施漢嶸先生“析債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓若干法律問(wèn)題”商榷[J];內(nèi)蒙古農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年04期

9 丘志喬;略論債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓[J];廣東經(jīng)濟(jì)管理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年02期

10 牛犁耘;;金融債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓的法律性質(zhì)探析[J];金融理論與實(shí)踐;2005年12期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前2條

1 張川華;;禁止債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓特約效力研究——以《國(guó)際商事合同通則(2004)》第9.1.9條為視角[A];2008全國(guó)博士生學(xué)術(shù)論壇（國(guó)際法）論文集——國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)法、國(guó)際環(huán)境法分冊(cè)[C];2008年

2 陳姝，

本文編號(hào)：2186872