【摘要】：無(wú)權(quán)處分規(guī)則一直是民法學(xué)界研究的重要規(guī)則之一。該規(guī)則涉及傳統(tǒng)民法中眾多基礎(chǔ)理論，，包括法律行為的概念，物權(quán)行為、債權(quán)行為的區(qū)分，無(wú)權(quán)處分行為的效力等等。我國(guó)《物權(quán)法》制定之后學(xué)界對(duì)無(wú)權(quán)處分的諸多問(wèn)題依然沒(méi)有定論。同時(shí)，由于我國(guó)《合同法》、《物權(quán)法》借鑒了法國(guó)和德國(guó)的不同規(guī)定，導(dǎo)致了立法上對(duì)無(wú)權(quán)處分規(guī)則的規(guī)定較為模糊。2010年，最高人民法院下發(fā)了《關(guān)于審理買(mǎi)賣(mài)合同案件若干問(wèn)題的解釋?zhuān)ㄕ髑笠庖?jiàn)稿）》，其中對(duì)無(wú)權(quán)買(mǎi)賣(mài)他人之物合同的效力做出了新的規(guī)定，文章以此為契機(jī)，從學(xué)理上對(duì)無(wú)權(quán)處分規(guī)則進(jìn)行更深一步的研究。 除引言和結(jié)語(yǔ)外，本文分為三章： 第一章“處分的基本理論”。本章主要對(duì)處分及處分行為的概念進(jìn)行闡述。首先介紹傳統(tǒng)民法中“處分行為”的理論淵源和意義，在此基礎(chǔ)上厘清與處分行為相關(guān)的概念，同時(shí)分析處分行為與負(fù)擔(dān)行為的區(qū)別及原因。最后，介紹處分權(quán)與無(wú)權(quán)處分的概念，為下文進(jìn)一步展開(kāi)論述做鋪墊。 第二章“處分行為有無(wú)對(duì)無(wú)權(quán)處分的影響”。由于世界各國(guó)對(duì)處分行為理論態(tài)度并不相同，因此本部分以是否承認(rèn)處分行為理論為標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，分別介紹了有處分行為的國(guó)家的無(wú)權(quán)處分規(guī)則和無(wú)處分行為國(guó)家的無(wú)權(quán)處分規(guī)則，試圖探求物權(quán)變動(dòng)模式的區(qū)別對(duì)無(wú)權(quán)處分規(guī)則的影響。同時(shí)，解析無(wú)權(quán)處分規(guī)則與善意取得制度、不當(dāng)?shù)美贫鹊穆?lián)系。 第三章“我國(guó)無(wú)權(quán)處分規(guī)則的現(xiàn)狀與重構(gòu)”。首先，從我國(guó)《合同法》第51條規(guī)定的無(wú)權(quán)處分規(guī)則入手，分析現(xiàn)階段我國(guó)學(xué)界對(duì)無(wú)權(quán)處分規(guī)則的不同理解。結(jié)合上文，闡述我國(guó)的無(wú)權(quán)處分規(guī)則的具體內(nèi)容，包括我國(guó)無(wú)權(quán)處分行為的效力，催告行為的性質(zhì)，追認(rèn)行為的性質(zhì)等。其次，通過(guò)對(duì)我國(guó)交易行為的“三個(gè)階段和兩個(gè)關(guān)系”的分析，論述處分權(quán)的缺乏對(duì)交易行為的具體影響，并以此為基礎(chǔ)對(duì)我國(guó)的無(wú)權(quán)處分規(guī)則進(jìn)行重構(gòu)。同時(shí)，在本部分中還論述了我國(guó)的善意取得、不當(dāng)?shù)美贫龋云谛纬梢粋�(gè)統(tǒng)一的，完整的理論和制度體系。
[Abstract]:The rule of unauthorized disposition has always been one of the important rules in the field of civil law. This rule involves many basic theories in the traditional civil law, including the concept of legal act, the act of real right, the distinction of the act of creditor's rights, the validity of the act of unauthorized disposition and so on. After the formulation of Real right Law, scholars still have no conclusion on the issue of unauthorized disposition. At the same time, because of the difference between France and Germany, the rules of unauthorized disposition are vague in legislation. In 2010, The Supreme people's Court issued an explanation (draft for opinions) on several issues concerning the trial of cases of sale and purchase contracts, which made new provisions on the effectiveness of contracts for the purchase and sale of things that did not have the right to buy and sell others. The article took this opportunity as an opportunity. From the theoretical point of view of the unauthorized disposition of the rules for a deeper study. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper is divided into three chapters: the first chapter, the basic theory of punishment. This chapter mainly expounds the concept of punishment and punishment behavior. This paper first introduces the theoretical origin and significance of "punishment behavior" in the traditional civil law, and then clarifies the concepts related to the punishment act, and analyzes the difference and reason between the punishment behavior and the burden behavior at the same time. Finally, it introduces the concept of disposition right and unauthorized disposition, which paves the way for further discussion. Chapter two: the influence of disposition on unauthorized disposition. As different countries in the world have different attitudes to the theory of disposition behavior, this part introduces the unauthorized disposition rules of the countries with disciplinary acts and the unauthorized disposition rules with nowhere branches as the state's unauthorized disposition rules, according to the criterion of whether to recognize the disciplinary behavior theory or not. This paper tries to explore the influence of the mode of real right change on the rules of unauthorized disposition. At the same time, it analyzes the relationship between unauthorized disposition rules and bona fide acquisition system and unjust enrichment system. Chapter three: the present situation and Reconstruction of the rules of unauthorized disposition in China. First of all, starting with the rules of unauthorized disposition stipulated in Article 51 of contract Law of China, this paper analyzes the different understandings of the rules of unauthorized disposition in Chinese academic circles at the present stage. Combined with the above, this paper expounds the specific contents of the rules of unauthorized disposition in our country, including the effectiveness of the unauthorized disposition in our country, the nature of the act of impeachment, the nature of the act of ratification, and so on. Secondly, through the analysis of the "three stages and two relations" of the transaction behavior in China, the author discusses the concrete influence of the lack of disposition right on the transaction behavior, and on this basis reconstructs the rules of unauthorized disposition in our country. At the same time, this part also discusses the system of bona fide acquisition and unjust enrichment in order to form a unified and complete system of theory and system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 于海涌;;論絕對(duì)物權(quán)行為理論之建構(gòu)——對(duì)薩維尼物權(quán)行為理論的矯正[J];法商研究;2006年04期

2 尹田;;法律行為分類(lèi)理論之檢討[J];法商研究;2007年01期

3 劉家安;;善意取得情形下轉(zhuǎn)讓行為的效力[J];法學(xué);2009年05期

4 李開(kāi)國(guó);物權(quán)與債權(quán)的比較研究[J];甘肅社會(huì)科學(xué);2005年02期

5 陳華彬;物權(quán)與債權(quán)二元權(quán)利體系的形成以及物權(quán)和債權(quán)的區(qū)分[J];河北法學(xué);2004年09期

6 崔建遠(yuǎn);無(wú)權(quán)處分辨——合同法第51條規(guī)定的解釋與適用[J];法學(xué)研究;2003年01期

7 吳光榮;;論無(wú)權(quán)處分的適用范圍[J];中外法學(xué);2005年03期

8 尹田;法國(guó)物權(quán)法上動(dòng)產(chǎn)的即時(shí)取得制度[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);1997年01期

9 田士永;出賣(mài)人處分權(quán)問(wèn)題研究[J];政法論壇;2003年06期

10 王利明;論無(wú)權(quán)處分[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2001年03期

本文編號(hào)：2183135