現(xiàn)代契約理念下的消費(fèi)者權(quán)益保護(hù)
[Abstract]:The consumer problem is accompanied by the development of the commodity economy. In the modern commodity economy, the consumer is very different from the operator in the economic strength, the ability to grasp the information and its own knowledge and skills. This difference directly leads to the inequality in the status of the consumers and the operators. The unequal status in the position, the operator is in the dominant position in the transaction, the consumer is forced to bend to the operator under the pressure of reality, let the operator make or modify the content of the transaction. Under the interest of the operator, the operator will inevitably sacrifice the rights and interests of the consumer to realize its own interests. Due to restrictions, the fairness of the transaction will be lost. Due to the influence of historical factors, there is still a situation of neglecting the freedom of the consumer contract in China, which leads to the incomplete and imperfect protection of the consumer in the process of making the law. For example, the contract law is too general and abstract to the consumer rights and interests, < the consumer protection law > > The protection of consumers' rights and interests under the modern contract concept is mainly to protect the true meaning of the consumer, because the real meaning expression is the concrete expression of the realization of the consumer contract freedom. The law passes the true meaning of the consumer to the consumer. The protection of the expression can avoid the interests of the consumer according to the content of the transaction which is determined by its unilateral meaning. Based on such a protection, we should improve the provisions of relevant laws, such as the contract law and the law of the protection of the consumer rights and interests, protect the true meaning of the consumer, realize the freedom of the consumer, and safeguard its legitimacy. Rights and interests.
This article discusses the consumer protection under the modern contract idea from four parts:
The first part expounds the deficiency of the protection of the rights and interests of consumers in China's law. It mainly analyzes the two basic laws of the contract law and the rights and interests of the consumer. It is clear that the extension of the consumer's rights is too narrow, the new consumer contract is lacking and the protection of the consumer association is not in place in four aspects, which explains the imperfections of the law on the protection of consumer rights and interests.
The second part expounds the legal origin of the insufficient consumer protection, namely, the neglect of the consumer's freedom of contract. The freedom of contract has developed from the idea of modern absolute contract freedom to a certain limit to the freedom of contract. However, under the influence of historical factors, the modern law still has the situation of neglecting the freedom of the consumer contract. Basically, it is because of the unequal trading status of the operator and the consumer. The operator is far more than the consumer in the economic strength, the awareness of the transaction information and so on, which leads to the neglect of the consumer's freedom of contract and the inability to truly express the meaning of his own heart.
The third part puts forward the basic idea of consumer protection under the concept of modern contract, that is, to protect the real meaning of consumers. The article mainly discusses the relationship between the protection of the real meaning of consumers and the realization of the freedom of the consumer contract. The meaning of the consumer's true meaning is to realize the consumer contract. An important way of freedom is that the real expression of the meaning inherent in the consumer is the concrete expression of the freedom of the contract. Therefore, to protect the true meaning of the consumer is to protect the freedom of the contract. Secondly, it discusses the effect of protecting the true meaning of the consumer to the operator. On the basis of the status of the weak person of the consumer, it can not damage the legitimate rights and interests of the operator. In the case of the ability of the operator or the circumstances of force majeure, the operator can not force the operator to sacrifice his own legitimate rights and interests to realize the interests of the consumer.
The fourth part, based on the idea of protecting the true meaning of the consumer, and combining with the specific performance of the consumer protection in China's law, puts forward the perfection of the related systems in the contract law and the law of the protection of the rights and interests of consumers, such as the provision of detailed format clauses, the establishment of a system of strong contracting and the cooling period system, etc. In order to improve the protection of consumers'rights and interests, relevant provisions should be made in time for the new consumer contracts.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類號(hào)】:D923.8;D923.6
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 朱慶育;意思表示與法律行為[J];比較法研究;2004年01期
2 姚新華;契約自由論[J];比較法研究;1997年01期
3 馮彥君;社會(huì)弱勢(shì)群體法律保護(hù)問題論綱[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2005年04期
4 許瑾;;關(guān)于消費(fèi)者合同的幾個(gè)問題[J];福建法學(xué);2000年04期
5 劉作翔;;我國為什么要實(shí)行案例指導(dǎo)制度[J];法律適用;2006年08期
6 張永忠;;消費(fèi)者主體地位的理論反思與制度重塑[J];法商研究;2009年03期
7 寧立志,許多奇;試論消費(fèi)者權(quán)益保護(hù)法的價(jià)值取向[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1999年04期
8 梁慧星;中國的消費(fèi)者政策和消費(fèi)者立法[J];法學(xué);2000年05期
9 遲穎;;法律行為之精髓——私法自治[J];河北法學(xué);2011年01期
10 嚴(yán)歡歡;;冷卻期制度研究[J];河南公安高等?茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2007年04期
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條
1 湖南大學(xué)法學(xué)院教授 屈茂輝 研究生 蔣學(xué)躍;[N];人民法院報(bào);2001年
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 張嚴(yán)方;消費(fèi)者保護(hù)法研究[D];中國社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院;2002年
2 丁海湖;案例指導(dǎo)制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2008年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前7條
1 李剛;論格式合同中的當(dāng)事人意思表示自由[D];中國政法大學(xué);2011年
2 付娟娟;知假買假案件的法律思考[D];西南政法大學(xué);2011年
3 劉吉山;消費(fèi)者法律保護(hù)若干問題研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2004年
4 張燕妮;電子商務(wù)合同若干問題研究[D];北京大學(xué);2005年
5 管娜;經(jīng)濟(jì)法視野下的消費(fèi)者合同研究[D];中國海洋大學(xué);2007年
6 王竹青;從契約正義的角度看契約自由的發(fā)展[D];西南政法大學(xué);2009年
7 蘇佳;消費(fèi)者保護(hù)法中的冷靜期制度研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2010年
本文編號(hào):2141883
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/2141883.html