吉林省白城市吉鶴賓館產(chǎn)權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓糾紛案評(píng)析
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-07-24 11:10
【摘要】：國(guó)有企業(yè)改制是我國(guó)目前最重要改革之一。國(guó)企改制可以充分發(fā)揮私有資本的力量，帶動(dòng)國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展。 市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)中存在著各種交易行為，其交易主體也多種多樣，而作為主要行政主體的政府在參與市場(chǎng)合同交易時(shí)，由于其身份的雙重性，極易造成單方的合同違約行為出現(xiàn)，從而使相對(duì)方的信賴?yán)嬖馐軗p失。信賴作為誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則的核心價(jià)值，是市場(chǎng)雙方合同履約的前提與基礎(chǔ)。作為管理社會(huì)主體的政府，違背信賴?yán)娴默F(xiàn)象十分普遍。 作者通過梳理白城市吉鶴賓館的產(chǎn)權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓這一案例，即白城市市直機(jī)關(guān)管理局為實(shí)現(xiàn)直屬白城賓館的市場(chǎng)化運(yùn)作而簽訂了股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同，并由此實(shí)施了一系列旨在推進(jìn)股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓的合法政府行為，但在合同履行過程中，卻拒不履行雙方約定，由此而產(chǎn)生糾紛。本文從國(guó)企改制中存在的主體認(rèn)定、合同效力、違約責(zé)任是否成立，以及損害賠償?shù)挠?jì)算方式等問題進(jìn)行了分析和討論。 筆者深入分析了雙方簽訂的合同行為是否有效。這直接關(guān)系到作為合同一方的政府在不履行合同后，造成的信賴?yán)鎿p失是否存在。根據(jù)《合同法》，，筆者從簽訂合同的主體方面是否符合適合，簽訂合同的意思表示的有效性，關(guān)于合同買賣的標(biāo)的是否符合法律以及國(guó)家的政策，以及合同擬定、簽訂過程中是否有存在不符合法律規(guī)定致使合同無效的情形存在，最后探究了一方在履行合同主要約定義務(wù)的情形下，政府拒不履行合同的行為表現(xiàn)。通過以上層層分析，認(rèn)定了在本合同中，政府違背了誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則，給相對(duì)方造成了信賴?yán)鎿p失。 筆者還分析了在違約損害賠償?shù)挠?jì)算方面，轉(zhuǎn)讓方應(yīng)賠償因其違約行為給受讓方造成的全部損失，包括該合同書履行后受讓方可以獲得的吉鶴賓館的資產(chǎn)增值利益及合理的經(jīng)營(yíng)利潤(rùn)。
[Abstract]:The reform of state-owned enterprises is one of the most important reforms in our country. The reform of state-owned enterprises can give full play to the power of private capital and drive the country's economic development. In the market economy, there are a variety of transaction behaviors, and the government, as the main administrative subject, in participating in the market contract transaction, because of its dual identity, it is easy to cause unilateral contract breach of contract behavior. As a result, the relative side of the trust interests suffered losses. As the core value of the principle of good faith, trust is the premise and foundation of contract performance. As the main body of the management society, the government violates the trust interest phenomenon is very common. Through combing the case of property right transfer of Jihe Hotel in Baicheng City, that is, the Baicheng Municipal Bureau of Government has signed a contract for the transfer of shares in order to realize the market-oriented operation of Baicheng Hotel directly under it. Therefore, a series of legal government actions aimed at promoting equity transfer have been carried out, but in the process of performing the contract, they have refused to fulfill the agreement of both parties, thus resulting in disputes. This paper analyzes and discusses the main body determination, contract validity, liability for breach of contract and the calculation method of damages in the reform of state-owned enterprises. The author deeply analyzes whether the contract behavior signed by both parties is effective. This is directly related to the loss of trust interest caused by the government as a party to the contract after failure to perform the contract. According to the contract Law, the author, in terms of whether the subject of the contract is suitable, the validity of the expression of intention of signing the contract, whether the subject matter of the contract is in conformity with the law and the state policy, and the contract drafting, In the process of signing, whether there exists the situation that the contract is invalid due to non-conformity with the law, at last, the author probes into the behavior of the government refusing to perform the contract under the circumstance of performing the main contractual obligations of one party. Through the above analysis, it is concluded that in this contract, the government has violated the principle of good faith and caused the loss of trust interest to the opposite party. The author also analyzes the calculation of damages for breach of contract, the transferee should compensate all the losses caused to the transferee due to its breach of contract. Including the contract after the performance of the transfer party may obtain the value-added benefits of the hotel and reasonable operating profits.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D923.6
本文編號(hào)：2141188
[Abstract]:The reform of state-owned enterprises is one of the most important reforms in our country. The reform of state-owned enterprises can give full play to the power of private capital and drive the country's economic development. In the market economy, there are a variety of transaction behaviors, and the government, as the main administrative subject, in participating in the market contract transaction, because of its dual identity, it is easy to cause unilateral contract breach of contract behavior. As a result, the relative side of the trust interests suffered losses. As the core value of the principle of good faith, trust is the premise and foundation of contract performance. As the main body of the management society, the government violates the trust interest phenomenon is very common. Through combing the case of property right transfer of Jihe Hotel in Baicheng City, that is, the Baicheng Municipal Bureau of Government has signed a contract for the transfer of shares in order to realize the market-oriented operation of Baicheng Hotel directly under it. Therefore, a series of legal government actions aimed at promoting equity transfer have been carried out, but in the process of performing the contract, they have refused to fulfill the agreement of both parties, thus resulting in disputes. This paper analyzes and discusses the main body determination, contract validity, liability for breach of contract and the calculation method of damages in the reform of state-owned enterprises. The author deeply analyzes whether the contract behavior signed by both parties is effective. This is directly related to the loss of trust interest caused by the government as a party to the contract after failure to perform the contract. According to the contract Law, the author, in terms of whether the subject of the contract is suitable, the validity of the expression of intention of signing the contract, whether the subject matter of the contract is in conformity with the law and the state policy, and the contract drafting, In the process of signing, whether there exists the situation that the contract is invalid due to non-conformity with the law, at last, the author probes into the behavior of the government refusing to perform the contract under the circumstance of performing the main contractual obligations of one party. Through the above analysis, it is concluded that in this contract, the government has violated the principle of good faith and caused the loss of trust interest to the opposite party. The author also analyzes the calculation of damages for breach of contract, the transferee should compensate all the losses caused to the transferee due to its breach of contract. Including the contract after the performance of the transfer party may obtain the value-added benefits of the hotel and reasonable operating profits.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D923.6
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條
1 胡智勇;私法自治與國(guó)家強(qiáng)制——法律強(qiáng)制性規(guī)范與無效民事法律行為關(guān)系之分析與構(gòu)建[J];重慶工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年06期
2 應(yīng)秀良;違反行政法強(qiáng)制性規(guī)定的合同效力探討以《房地產(chǎn)管理法》為研究對(duì)象[J];法律適用;2004年03期
3 潘麗;關(guān)于違法合同效力的若干問題分析[J];法律適用;2005年09期
4 劉凱湘;夏小雄;;論違反強(qiáng)制性規(guī)范的合同效力——?dú)v史考察與原因分析[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2011年01期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 周效宇;違反強(qiáng)制性規(guī)定契約效力研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2005年
本文編號(hào)：2141188
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/2141188.html
最近更新
教材專著
