本文選題：溯及力 + 恢復原狀��； 參考：《華東政法大學》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國《合同法》關于合同解除權行使效果并沒有詳細規(guī)定，僅進行了原則約定，解除是否具有溯及力、如何進行恢復原狀以及解除合同后進行損害賠償的范圍等問題都仍然存在法律解釋的空間。本文從我國合同立法歷史沿革入手，分析各個階段對解除權制度的取舍，以及立法例的不足，，在此基礎上對需要填補的問題逐一進行論述。文章論述部分分為三部分，合同解除溯及力、恢復原狀義務的具體化和合同解除后損害賠償的請求。 第一章“問題的提出”，作為文章的首部分，對解除權的范疇進行界定，明確對解除權的理解。同時解釋了對合同解除與合同終止的區(qū)別，對我國合同法中的解除權適用范圍進行限定，即排出合同終止情形的適用。 第二章“我國解除權效果演變與規(guī)范考察”，這一章從我國合同立法歷史沿革角度出發(fā)，包括經濟合同法、涉外經濟合同法和技術合同法三足鼎立的時期，到統(tǒng)一合同立法的過程中，解除權效果如何發(fā)生變化的，以及這種變化對所帶來的結果。在進行歷史沿革中，輔之以比較法的研究，對國際條約中解除權效果內容進行比較，得出我國目前合同解除權效果的組成，作為之后討論的基礎。 第三章“合同解除性質——溯及力問題”，合同解除溯及力作為解除權效果制度的基礎問題，對其他內容都有重要影響。本章首先從大陸法國家解除權效果制度的演進為比較法材料，日本、德國和我國臺灣地區(qū)“民法”解除權制度的發(fā)展，特別是德國新舊債法的比較。合同解除權溯及力有直接說、折中說和間接效果說三種主流觀點。哪種觀點在法理和實踐上更加符合我國立法目的，是本章論述的重點內容。 第四章“恢復原狀義務性質辨析”，恢復原狀、采取其他補救措施是合同法明確規(guī)定的解除權效果之一，但是具體如何恢復、不能恢復時怎樣處理，法條中并沒有具體說明。本章以前文中對德國新舊債法比較研究為基礎，借鑒德國新債法中恢復原狀內容，分成第97條恢復原狀的內涵、返還原物的性質、價值補償義務和用益的返還幾個部分進行論述。 最后一章為合同解除后的損害賠償請求。首先是合同解除后損害賠償請求權的性質，對此有選擇主義、信賴利益和履行利益三種學說。另一個重要問題就是，損害賠償的范圍，如何劃分返還原物和損害賠償的范圍，避免重復補償�？傻美媸欠駥儆诤贤獬筚r償范圍仍然具有爭議。同時，對在協(xié)議解除、預期違約和不可抗力具體情況中如何界定賠償的范圍進行論述。
[Abstract]:China's contract Law has no detailed provisions on the effect of the exercise of the right to rescind the contract, but has only agreed in principle whether the rescission has retroactive effect. There is still room for legal interpretation on how to restore the original condition and the scope of damages after the termination of the contract. Starting with the history of contract legislation in our country, this paper analyzes the choice and choice of the system of rescission right in each stage, and the insufficiency of the legislation, and on this basis discusses the problems that need to be filled one by one. The article is divided into three parts, the retroactive effect of the contract, the concretization of the restitution obligation and the request for damages after the termination of the contract. As the first part of the article, the first part defines the category of the right of rescission and makes clear the understanding of the right of rescission. At the same time, it explains the difference between the termination of the contract and the termination of the contract, and limits the scope of application of the right of rescission in the contract law of our country, that is, excluding the application of the circumstances of termination of the contract. The second chapter, "Evolution and normative investigation of the effect of rescission right in China", starts from the historical evolution of China's contract legislation, including the period of economic contract law, foreign economic contract law and technical contract law. In the process of uniform contract legislation, how does the effect of rescission change, and the result of this change. In the course of historical evolution, the author compares the contents of the effect of rescission in international treaties with the comparative study, and draws the composition of the effect of rescission of contract in our country, which is the basis of later discussion. The third chapter is "the nature of contract rescission-retroactive effect", the retroactive effect of contract rescission, as the basic issue of the system of rescission effect, has important influence on other contents. This chapter firstly evolves from the system of relieving power in mainland France to the material of comparative law, and the development of the system of rescission of civil law in Japan, Germany and Taiwan, especially the comparison of new and old German law of debt. The retroactive effect of contract rescission has three main views: direct theory, compromise theory and indirect effect theory. Which point of view is more in line with the legislative purpose of our country in legal theory and practice, is the key content of this chapter. The fourth chapter "the nature of restitution obligations", restitution, take other remedial measures is one of the clear provisions of the contract law, one of the effects of the right of rescission, but the specific recovery, how to deal with the failure to restore, the law does not specify the provisions. On the basis of the comparative study of the old and new German debt methods, this chapter draws lessons from the contents of the new German debt law and divides it into the connotation of article 97, and the nature of the return of the original. The obligation of value compensation and the return of usages are discussed in several parts. The last chapter is the claim for damages after the termination of the contract. The first is the nature of the claim for damages after the termination of the contract. There are three theories: selectivism, reliance interest and performance interest. Another important question is how to divide the scope of compensation for damages and how to divide the scope of return of original and damages to avoid repeated compensation. Whether the interest is within the scope of compensation after the termination of the contract is still controversial. At the same time, it discusses how to define the scope of compensation in the circumstances of agreement dissolution, expected breach of contract and force majeure.
【學位授予單位】：華東政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.6

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前4條

1 張馳;違約責任條款地位論[J];法學;2004年12期

2 盧諶;杜景林;;論合同解除的學理及現(xiàn)代規(guī)制——以國際統(tǒng)一法和民族國家為視角[J];法學;2006年04期

3 李克武;論可得利益及其違約賠償——兼評《合同法》第113條[J];河南省政法管理干部學院學報;2002年06期

4 陸青;;合同解除有無溯及力之爭有待休矣——以意大利法為視角的再思考[J];河南省政法管理干部學院學報;2010年03期

本文編號：2094300