本文選題：電視節(jié)目模式 + 著作權(quán)��； 參考：《南京理工大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：電視節(jié)目模式是指具有共同特性的一系列元素有機(jī)結(jié)合而成的一整套表達(dá)。近二十年來(lái),全球電視節(jié)目模式被抄襲現(xiàn)象日益嚴(yán)重,大量的相關(guān)法律糾紛亟待處理�；诠膭�(lì)創(chuàng)新、維護(hù)市場(chǎng)秩序的考量,電視節(jié)目模式應(yīng)當(dāng)受到法律的保護(hù)。世界范圍內(nèi)已經(jīng)有十余個(gè)國(guó)家先后確立了電視節(jié)目模式的法律保護(hù)制度,在具體的路徑選擇上,有反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法保護(hù)模式、著作權(quán)法保護(hù)模式、合同法保護(hù)模式與商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)模式。電視節(jié)目模式非著作權(quán)法律保護(hù)模式有其局限性,電視節(jié)目模式是具有獨(dú)創(chuàng)性的智力成果,能夠形成有形的表達(dá),符合著作權(quán)客體的要求,應(yīng)當(dāng)受到著作權(quán)法的保護(hù)。 考察世界各國(guó)的立法與判例,各國(guó)的電視節(jié)目模式著作權(quán)法律保護(hù)制度在具體設(shè)計(jì)時(shí)頗有差異。在英國(guó),電視節(jié)目模式如果符合文字作品、電影作品或戲劇作品的要求即可獲得著作權(quán)法律保護(hù)；在美國(guó)部分州,電視節(jié)目模式只要符合著作權(quán)法客體的本質(zhì)要求即可獲得著作權(quán)法保護(hù)；荷蘭、意大利法律則規(guī)定電視節(jié)目模式是一種法定的作品類型。 電視節(jié)目模式作為新興的作品類型,其著作權(quán)法律保護(hù)的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)在世界范圍內(nèi)呈現(xiàn)出多樣性：英美法系部分法院采“實(shí)質(zhì)相似性”與“接觸”標(biāo)準(zhǔn),部分法院采高度獨(dú)創(chuàng)性標(biāo)準(zhǔn),荷蘭、巴西法院采元素覆蓋標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。“實(shí)質(zhì)相似性”與“接觸”標(biāo)準(zhǔn)適用的對(duì)象是具有可版權(quán)性的電視節(jié)目模式,它通過(guò)外在檢測(cè)與本質(zhì)檢測(cè)相結(jié)合的方法,來(lái)進(jìn)行電視節(jié)目模式著作權(quán)侵權(quán)認(rèn)定。在高度獨(dú)創(chuàng)性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)下,電視節(jié)目模式需要達(dá)到較高的獨(dú)創(chuàng)性級(jí)別才能獲得著作權(quán)法律保護(hù)。元素覆蓋標(biāo)準(zhǔn)則依據(jù)兩個(gè)涉案的電視節(jié)目模式在構(gòu)成元素上的重復(fù)度與相似度來(lái)進(jìn)行著作權(quán)侵權(quán)認(rèn)定。 我國(guó)的電視節(jié)目模式著作權(quán)法律保護(hù)仍處于空白,但是相關(guān)的案例糾紛卻屢見不鮮。我國(guó)應(yīng)當(dāng)將電視節(jié)目模式納入著作權(quán)法律客體范圍,在電視節(jié)目模式著作權(quán)法律保護(hù)制度設(shè)計(jì)上遵循鼓勵(lì)創(chuàng)新、利益平衡與寬嚴(yán)相濟(jì)的原則。我國(guó)法院在進(jìn)行著作權(quán)侵權(quán)認(rèn)定時(shí),不能機(jī)械的適用三步法,應(yīng)當(dāng)結(jié)合實(shí)質(zhì)相似性檢測(cè)方法,綜合考察兩個(gè)涉案的電視節(jié)目模式。我國(guó)的電視節(jié)目模式著作權(quán)侵權(quán)賠償應(yīng)當(dāng)奉行法定賠償原則,同時(shí)結(jié)合電視節(jié)目模式的運(yùn)作特點(diǎn),綜合考慮電視節(jié)目模式許可費(fèi)用、侵權(quán)行為性質(zhì)、廣告效益等因素。
[Abstract]:TV program pattern refers to a series of elements with common characteristics which are combined to form a whole set of expressions. In the past twenty years, the plagiarism of TV program mode in the world is becoming more and more serious, and a large number of related legal disputes need to be dealt with. Based on the consideration of encouraging innovation and maintaining market order, TV program mode should be protected by law. More than a dozen countries around the world have successively established the legal protection system of the television program model. In the specific path choice, there are anti-unfair competition law protection models and copyright law protection models. Contract law protection mode and trade secret protection mode. The mode of non-copyright legal protection of TV program has its limitations. The mode of television program is an original intellectual achievement, which can form tangible expression and meet the requirements of copyright object, and should be protected by copyright law. Reviewing the legislations and precedents of various countries, it is found that the legal protection system of television program copyright is quite different in the specific design. In the United Kingdom, a television program model is protected by law if it meets the requirements of literary, film or dramatic works; in some states of the United States, Television program mode can be protected by copyright law as long as it meets the essential requirements of the object of copyright law, while the Dutch and Italian laws stipulate that television program mode is a legal type of work. As a new type of works, the standards of copyright legal protection of TV programs are diverse in the world: some courts of Anglo-American law system adopt the standards of "substantial similarity" and "contact", and some courts adopt highly original standards. The Dutch, Brazilian courts take the element coverage standard. The object of "substantial similarity" and "contact" is the copyright mode of TV program, which is determined by the combination of external detection and essence detection. Under the standard of high originality, the mode of TV program needs to reach a higher level of originality in order to obtain the legal protection of copyright. The criterion of element coverage is based on the repetition and similarity of the two TV program patterns involved in the case to determine copyright infringement. The copyright protection of TV program mode in our country is still in blank, but the related case disputes are common. Our country should bring TV program mode into the scope of copyright law object, and follow the principle of encouraging innovation, balancing interests and combining leniency with severity in the design of copyright legal protection system of TV program mode. The court of our country should not apply the three-step method mechanically when determining the copyright infringement, and should comprehensively investigate the two TV program modes involved in the case by combining the method of detecting the substantial similarity. The compensation for copyright infringement of TV program mode in our country should follow the principle of statutory compensation. At the same time, combined with the operating characteristics of TV program mode, the factors such as the cost of licensing, the nature of infringement, and the effectiveness of advertisement should be considered comprehensively.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41;G222

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李雨峰;;思想/表達(dá)二分法的檢討[J];北大法律評(píng)論;2007年02期

2 馮曉青;;著作權(quán)法中思想與表達(dá)二分法原則探析[J];湖南文理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年01期

3 羅莉;;電視節(jié)目模板的法律保護(hù)[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

4 柯冬英;試論電視綜藝節(jié)目的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2003年02期

5 周平;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)侵權(quán)損害賠償問(wèn)題探討——兼談我國(guó)三部知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律的修改[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2003年04期

6 王太平;;美國(guó)Dastar案:區(qū)分商標(biāo)與著作權(quán)法,捍衛(wèi)公共領(lǐng)域[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2006年02期

7 柳洪祥;;權(quán)利擴(kuò)張與權(quán)利限制的博弈 從平衡的視角審視著作權(quán)合理使用制度的重構(gòu)[J];法律適用;2007年09期

8 張玉敏;曹博;;論作品的獨(dú)創(chuàng)性——以滑稽模仿和后現(xiàn)代為視角[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年04期

9 胡充寒;韓學(xué)周;;突圍壟斷:中國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)之向度把握——以中西方文化傳統(tǒng)差異為視角[J];法學(xué)雜志;2012年05期

10 李國(guó)慶;;侵害知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)損害賠償若干問(wèn)題探討[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2006年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1934865