本文選題：法律淵源 + 法典化�。� 參考：《中國人民大學學報》2017年04期

【摘要】：法律淵源體系在當代呈現(xiàn)出多元主義和多中心主義的特征,這構成法典化在當代最大的挑戰(zhàn)。民法典的法律淵源體系必然保持開放性,對成文法之外的其他法律淵源保持開放。必須擯棄成文法中心主義,允許習慣、司法解釋與判例、一般法律原則等其他法律淵源進入民事關系的場域以發(fā)揮各自的功能;在保證法的安定性價值的同時,保持法的演進性,使民法典真正成為與時俱進的"活法"。就此而言,2017年《民法總則》關于法律淵源的規(guī)定確實具有重大的進步意義,這突出表現(xiàn)為習慣從過去由《合同法》、《物權法》等部門法中的零散規(guī)定,上升為總則中的一般性法律淵源,由此,習慣在民法中取得了正式的一般性淵源的地位。這也是我國未來的民法典的開放性的重要表現(xiàn)。不過,對于《民法總則》所未規(guī)定的法律淵源形式,包括國家政策、司法性淵源、一般法律原則等,不宜完全將其排斥在法源體系之外,而應根據(jù)民事案件審判的具體需要,運用法律解釋學的方法,將其作為實質性淵源據(jù)以參考,從而最終做出最適宜的判決。
[Abstract]:The origin system of law presents the characteristics of pluralism and polycentrism in contemporary times, which constitutes the greatest challenge of codification in contemporary times. The legal source system of civil code must remain open and open to other legal sources. We must abandon the centralism of statute law and allow other sources of law, such as custom, judicial interpretation and precedent, general principles of law, to enter the field of civil relations in order to play their respective functions. Maintaining the evolution of the law makes the Civil Code a "living law" that keeps pace with the times. In this regard, the 2017 General provisions of the Civil Law on the sources of law are indeed of great progressive significance. This is highlighted by the fact that custom has been set out in the past by the fragmented provisions of the law of contract, the law of real rights, and other sectoral laws, such as the Law on contract, the Law on Real Rights, and so on. As a general source of law, custom gained the status of formal general source in civil law. This is also an important manifestation of the openness of China's future civil code. However, the forms of legal sources not stipulated in the General principles of Civil Law, including state policy, judicial sources, general principles of law, etc., should not be completely excluded from the legal source system, but should be judged according to the specific needs of civil cases. The method of legal hermeneutics is used as the reference of substantive origin, and the most appropriate judgment is finally made.
【基金】：中國人民大學-日內瓦大學種子基金——中國人民大學科學研究基金項目(中央高�；究蒲袠I(yè)務費專項資金資助)“瑞士債法典的改革與中國民法典的編纂”(16XNQ021)
【分類號】：D923

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前4條

1 姚輝;;論民事法律淵源的擴張[J];北方法學;2008年01期

2 尹小榮;;我國婦女權益保護探微——以法律淵源為視角[J];福建論壇(人文社會科學版);2006年S1期

3 張錦娟;;探究民事習慣在民法典中的應有體現(xiàn)[J];法制與社會;2013年25期

4 石佳友;;論民法典的特征與優(yōu)勢[J];南都學壇;2008年02期

，

本文編號：1931639