發(fā)布時間：2018-05-01 12:18

  本文選題：繼續(xù)性合同 + 解除制度��； 參考：《南昌大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展,合同糾紛層出不窮,其中繼續(xù)性合同糾紛不占少數(shù)。其已經(jīng)成為一種在現(xiàn)代商業(yè)交易中不可忽視的合同類型。并且由于其區(qū)別于一時性合同的特殊屬性,使其在交易中具有更大的風(fēng)險性。它的穩(wěn)定和安全將直接關(guān)系到經(jīng)濟秩序的穩(wěn)定和健康發(fā)展�？墒强v觀各國的合同立法,仍然是以一時性合同為主導(dǎo),繼續(xù)性合同僅僅處于補充地位,我國現(xiàn)行合同法也不例外。筆者試圖通過本文從繼續(xù)性合同的特點出發(fā)對繼續(xù)性合同的解除制度進行研究。 首先,對繼續(xù)性合同的概念的界定法學(xué)家們?nèi)匀淮嬖诤芏嗟姆制��？v觀各種學(xué)說的主要內(nèi)容,筆者認為,繼續(xù)性合同的最大特點就在于時間因素是決定合同給付總量的決定性因素。 其次,一時性合同法定解除權(quán)的產(chǎn)生原因在合同法中有明確規(guī)定,繼續(xù)性合同在遵照適用之外,由于其自身特點決定了其在解除權(quán)的產(chǎn)生原因上有自身的特點。 其三,在合同解除制度中,解除后的法律后果是最重要的內(nèi)容。在繼續(xù)性合同解除制度中繼續(xù)性合同解除后的法律后果也與一時性合同解除后的法律后果有很大的差異。 筆者將從以上幾個方面緊緊圍繞一時性合同與繼續(xù)性合同的差異,采用比較的分析方法,對繼續(xù)性合同解除制度進行一個較為全面的研究。并試圖彌補當今立法的缺陷,解決實踐中存在的一些問題。
[Abstract]:With the development of economy, contract disputes emerge in endlessly, among which continuing contract disputes are not a minority. It has become a kind of contract type which can not be ignored in modern commercial transactions. And because it is different from the special attribute of temporary contract, it has greater risk in the transaction. Its stability and security will be directly related to the stability and healthy development of economic order. However, the contract legislation of various countries is still dominated by temporary contract, and the continuing contract is only in a supplementary position, and the current contract law of our country is no exception. The author tries to study the rescission system of continuing contract from the characteristics of continuing contract. First of all, jurists still have a lot of differences about the definition of continuing contract. Throughout the main contents of various theories, the author thinks that the biggest characteristic of continuous contract is that time is the decisive factor that determines the total amount of contract payment. Secondly, the cause of the legal right of rescission of temporary contract is clearly stipulated in the contract law. Besides its application, the contract of continuance has its own characteristics because of its own characteristics. Third, in the system of rescission of contract, the legal consequence after rescission is the most important content. In the system of rescission of continuing contract, the legal consequence of termination of continuing contract is also different from that of termination of temporary contract. The author will focus on the difference between temporary contract and continuing contract from the above several aspects, and use comparative analysis method to carry on a relatively comprehensive research on the system of termination of continuing contract. And try to make up for the defects of current legislation and solve some problems in practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D923.6

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 崔建遠;關(guān)于恢復(fù)原狀、返還財產(chǎn)的辨析[J];當代法學(xué);2005年01期

2 王繼紅;俞里江;;房屋差價損害賠償問題研究[J];法律適用;2009年02期

3 李玉文;論繼續(xù)性合同中的抗辯權(quán)[J];法商研究;2004年03期

4 韓世遠;;我國合同法中的締約上過失問題研究[J];法學(xué)家;2004年03期

5 潘銘明;;淺析合同解除的溯及力[J];法制與社會;2010年22期

6 余躍武;王惠玲;;合同解除的法律后果[J];人民司法;2011年21期

7 欒志紅;關(guān)于繼續(xù)性合同的幾個問題[J];法學(xué)論壇;2002年05期

8 董則明;;淺析合同解除的法律后果[J];山東審判;2007年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前7條

1 呂天宇;論合同解除的法律效果[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

2 王天斌;關(guān)于經(jīng)營場所租賃糾紛法律問題研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2011年

3 於昆;繼續(xù)性合同理論問題研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2011年

4 繆歡;合同解除效力探究[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2006年

5 李順華;論供用電合同的履行[D];湖南大學(xué);2007年

6 丁銳;繼續(xù)性合同研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2009年

7 李向鋒;合同違約解除之損失賠償研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：1829329