發(fā)布時間：2018-04-23 21:22

  本文選題：默示許可 + 限制條款　； 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：默示許可制度屬于私法領(lǐng)域許可方式的一種，我國在合同法相關(guān)司法解釋中出現(xiàn)了明確的默示許可定義。科學(xué)技術(shù)的發(fā)展推動了社會的進(jìn)步，也直接推動了著作權(quán)相關(guān)制度的革新，著作權(quán)人利益也在數(shù)字技術(shù)的推動下得到了擴(kuò)展和延伸。然而，社會的總體利益是一定的，版權(quán)人利益的擴(kuò)張，畢竟會影響到版權(quán)人以外的社會公眾的利益。默示許可制度在版權(quán)法中某些領(lǐng)域的運用，某種程度上可以說是最優(yōu)的社會利益平衡的實踐。而在我國現(xiàn)有的版權(quán)法理論中，至今還沒有關(guān)于默示許可如何具體適用以及其適用具體判斷條件的規(guī)定。 本文從我國一起版權(quán)訴訟中默示許可的適用引出問題，主要探討一般情形之下的默示許可制度在我國版權(quán)領(lǐng)域適用時的具體判定條件。文章由導(dǎo)言、正文和結(jié)論組成。 導(dǎo)言部分主要介紹筆者撰寫本文的目的，即希望通過對默示許可制度在我國和外國的某些版權(quán)領(lǐng)域的適用案例進(jìn)行分析，提出在我國版權(quán)法某些特定領(lǐng)域適用默示許可的可行性和必要性，同時為實踐中正確適用和判定默示許可提供參考意見。 正文部分主要包括三章內(nèi)容： 第一章以三面向訴金農(nóng)網(wǎng)案為切入點，引出問題，，并在此基礎(chǔ)上介紹默示許可制度的由來以及在我國的相關(guān)立法情況，分析了默示許可的屬性以及默示許可與合理使用的不同點。默示許可制度屬于一種版權(quán)授權(quán)許可使用的方式，常常用于著作權(quán)侵權(quán)抗辯，其與版權(quán)法明確規(guī)定的合理使用制度有著一定相似性，但是他們之間存在著本質(zhì)的不同。 第二章從方正訴寶潔案引起爭議的原因著手，從版權(quán)人以外的第三人角度探討了在判定默示許可適用時的客觀因素，主要是基于“合理期待”如何判定默示許可的適用。 第三章以Field vs. Google案為切入點，主要探討默示許可適用時主觀因素的判斷，即從版權(quán)人的角度判定其是否有主觀上許可他人使用的意思表示，主要是基于限制條款、知道使用、鼓勵使用的判定。 最后一部分是結(jié)論，主要對如何具體運用默示許可判定的主、客觀因素進(jìn)行歸納和總結(jié)，以及闡述本篇論文的不足，以期補充。
[Abstract]:The implied license system is one of the licensing methods in the field of private law. There is a clear definition of implied license in the judicial interpretation of contract law in China. The development of science and technology has promoted the progress of society and the innovation of copyright related system. The interests of copyright owners have also been expanded and extended under the promotion of digital technology. However, the overall interests of the society are certain, the expansion of the interests of copyright owners, after all, will affect the interests of the public other than copyright owners. The application of implied license system in some fields of copyright law can be said to be the best practice of balancing social interests to some extent. However, in the current copyright law theory of our country, there are no regulations on how to apply implied license and how to apply it to specific judgment conditions. From the application of implied license in a copyright lawsuit in our country, this paper mainly discusses the concrete judgment conditions of the implied license system when it is applicable in the copyright field of our country under general circumstances. The article consists of an introduction, a text and a conclusion. The introduction part mainly introduces the author's purpose of writing this article, that is, the author hopes to analyze the application cases of implied license system in some copyright fields of our country and foreign countries. This paper puts forward the feasibility and necessity of applying implied license in some specific areas of copyright law of our country, and at the same time provides the reference for correctly applying and judging implied license in practice. The main body part includes three chapters: The first chapter introduces the origin of implied license system and the relevant legislation in our country based on the case of "three faces v. Jinnong net" as the starting point. The properties of implied license and the difference between implied license and reasonable use are analyzed. The implied license system is a kind of copyright licensing method, which is often used in the defense of copyright infringement. It is similar to the reasonable use system stipulated by copyright law, but there are essential differences between them. The second chapter discusses the objective factors when judging the application of implied license from the angle of the third party other than copyright owner, starting from the reason of controversy caused by Fang Zheng v. P & G, mainly based on "reasonable expectation" how to judge the application of implied license. The third chapter takes Field vs. case as the breakthrough point, mainly discusses the subjective factor judgment of implied license application, that is, judging whether the copyright owner has the intention of subjectively permitting others to use, mainly based on the restriction clause, knowing the use. A decision that encourages use. The last part is the conclusion, which mainly summarizes and summarizes the subjective and objective factors of how to use the implied license judgment, and expounds the deficiency of this paper in order to supplement.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D923.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 呂炳斌;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)時代的版權(quán)默示許可制度——兩起Google案的分析[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2009年07期

2 梅術(shù)文;;信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)默示許可制度的不足與完善[J];法學(xué);2009年06期

3 王棟;;基于網(wǎng)絡(luò)搜索服務(wù)的默示許可制度研究[J];民辦教育研究;2010年02期

4 劉志剛;合理使用與許可使用的異同及適用[J];圖書館建設(shè);2005年05期

本文編號：1793669