本文選題：繼續(xù)性合同 + 終止事由��； 參考：《廈門大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：合同解除與和合同終止是合同消滅的兩種重要方式,前者適用于一時(shí)性合同,而后者則適用于繼續(xù)性合同。繼續(xù)性合同終止應(yīng)當(dāng)僅向?qū)?lái)消滅合同關(guān)系,已經(jīng)履行部分繼續(xù)有效,尚未履行部分不再履行。傳統(tǒng)民法中合同解除與終止的分野在我國(guó)合同法中體現(xiàn)為合同解除是否具有溯及力問(wèn)題的探討。在我國(guó)現(xiàn)有的法律規(guī)范模式下,對(duì)繼續(xù)性合同的規(guī)范不得不依賴一時(shí)性合同的規(guī)則。同時(shí),為準(zhǔn)確判定履行情況和合同性質(zhì),還需在更大程度上依賴法官的自由裁量,而這必將會(huì)造成法律適用的不確定性。為解決上述問(wèn)題,我國(guó)合同法未來(lái)應(yīng)當(dāng)完善對(duì)繼續(xù)性合同終止制度的規(guī)范,明確規(guī)定繼續(xù)性合同終止的法律制度。本文共分為五章： 第一章為繼續(xù)性合同概述,主要羅列和梳理德國(guó)、臺(tái)灣以及我國(guó)大陸學(xué)者對(duì)繼續(xù)性合同概念的不同界定,總結(jié)繼續(xù)性合同的本質(zhì)特征,探討繼續(xù)性合同的法理基礎(chǔ)。 第二章著重闡述了繼續(xù)性合同終止制度建構(gòu)的意義和邏輯基礎(chǔ)。通過(guò)分析和批判繼續(xù)性合同解除不具有溯及力的傳統(tǒng)解釋,提出繼續(xù)性合同解除不應(yīng)當(dāng)具有溯及力的根本原因在于繼續(xù)性合同本身的特征,即合同給付義務(wù)中個(gè)別給付的獨(dú)立性。 第三章探討了繼續(xù)性合同終止的類型與終止事由。首先分析了繼續(xù)性合同終止的兩種形式及其特征,重點(diǎn)闡述了繼續(xù)性合同非任意終止的事由。進(jìn)一步對(duì)“信賴喪失”與繼續(xù)性合同終止的關(guān)系進(jìn)行了論述。 第四章對(duì)繼續(xù)性合同終止的法律效果進(jìn)行分析。對(duì)合同解除效果的不同學(xué)說(shuō)進(jìn)行了對(duì)比分析與總結(jié),在此基礎(chǔ)上著重論述了繼續(xù)性合同終止的法律效果。 第五章探討了我國(guó)《合同法》未來(lái)對(duì)繼續(xù)性合同終止制度的具體建構(gòu)。
[Abstract]:Termination of contract and termination of contract are two important ways to eliminate the contract. The former applies to temporary contract and the latter to continuance contract.The termination of a continuing contract shall only extinguish the contractual relationship in the future, the performed part shall continue to be valid and the unperformed part shall cease to be performed.In the traditional civil law, the difference between the termination of contract and the dissolution of contract is reflected in the retroactive effect of the rescission of contract.Under the current legal norm mode of our country, the norm of continuing contract has to rely on the rule of temporary contract.At the same time, in order to judge the performance and the nature of the contract accurately, it is necessary to rely on the judge's discretion to a greater extent, which will lead to the uncertainty of the application of the law.In order to solve the above problems, China's contract law should perfect the norms of the system of termination of the continuing contract in the future, and clearly stipulate the legal system of the termination of the continuing contract.This paper is divided into five chapters:The first chapter is an overview of continuing contract, which mainly lists and combs the different definitions of the concept of continuing contract in Germany, Taiwan and mainland China, summarizes the essential characteristics of continuing contract, and probes into the legal basis of continuing contract.The second chapter focuses on the significance and logical basis of the construction of continuing contract termination system.By analyzing and criticizing the traditional interpretation that the continuance contract rescinding does not have retroactive effect, the author points out that the fundamental reason why the continuance contract rescinding should not have retroactive effect lies in the characteristics of the continuance contract itself.In other words, the independence of individual payment in the obligation of contract payment.Chapter three discusses the types and reasons of termination of continuing contract.This paper first analyzes the two forms and their characteristics of the termination of a continuing contract, and emphatically expounds the reasons for the non-arbitrary termination of the contract.The relationship between the loss of trust and the termination of continuing contract is further discussed.Chapter four analyzes the legal effect of the termination of continuing contract.This paper makes a comparative analysis and summary of different theories on the effect of termination of contract, and on this basis discusses emphatically the legal effect of termination of contract of continuance.Chapter five discusses the concrete construction of the system of continuing contract termination in the future of contract Law of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廈門大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D923.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 龔賽紅;;論民法典中的合同的解除與合同終止[J];北京化工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年04期

2 陳德敏,崢嶸;合同解除及其效力探析[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年03期

3 寧踢坡;合同解除溯及力探討——兼論合同終止[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2003年08期

4 張楚;簡(jiǎn)論合同終止[J];西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1988年03期

5 崔建遠(yuǎn);吳光榮;;我國(guó)合同法上解除權(quán)的行使規(guī)則[J];法律適用;2009年11期

6 許軍;合同終止辨析[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年02期

7 張紅;;論繼續(xù)性合同終止制度的法律構(gòu)造[J];財(cái)經(jīng)理論與實(shí)踐;2012年06期

8 苗振林;尚賢;;論合同解除的法律效果[J];河南社會(huì)科學(xué);2006年02期

9 崔建遠(yuǎn);;解除效果折衷說(shuō)之評(píng)論[J];法學(xué)研究;2012年02期

10 丁銳;;繼續(xù)性合同探析[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張紅;繼續(xù)性合同終止制度研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1759304