本文選題：法律行為 + 形式��； 參考：《法制與社會(huì)》2014年34期

【摘要】：我國(guó)《合同法》第36條規(guī)定了合同的治愈規(guī)則,但其立法模式則不盡合理。本文通過(guò)對(duì)德國(guó)法的法律行為治愈理論的考察,認(rèn)為德國(guó)法模式很好的平衡了形式目的、意思自治和個(gè)案正義三種價(jià)值,進(jìn)而提出我國(guó)應(yīng)當(dāng)借鑒德國(guó)法的先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn),建立以無(wú)效為原則、以治愈為例外的法律行為形式規(guī)則,并不斷豐富判例類型,以誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則對(duì)形式規(guī)則進(jìn)行有效限制,以保證個(gè)案正義的實(shí)現(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:Article 36 of contract Law of our country stipulates the cure rule of contract, but its legislative mode is unreasonable.Based on the investigation of the theory of cure of legal act in German law, the author thinks that the model of German law has well balanced the value of formal purpose, autonomy of will and case justice, and then puts forward that our country should draw lessons from the advanced experience of German law.In order to guarantee the realization of case justice, we should establish the rule of legal behavior with the principle of invalidity and cure as the exception, and enrich the types of case law and restrict the rule of form by the principle of good faith.
【作者單位】： 中國(guó)保險(xiǎn)監(jiān)督管理委員會(huì)北京監(jiān)管局;
【分類號(hào)】：D951.6;D923.6
，

本文編號(hào)：1756361