本文選題：瑕疵合同 + 商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)��； 參考：《中南大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：摘要：商業(yè)秘密瑕疵合同是商業(yè)秘密確權(quán)合同中欠缺一項或者多項有效要件或存在誤解而違背真實意愿時簽訂的效力瑕疵合同,有無效、可撤銷和可變更、效力待定三類。瑕疵合同下的商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)救濟(jì)是指基于商業(yè)秘密瑕疵合同而發(fā)生的商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)救濟(jì)。廣西李某商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)案是一起瑕疵合同侵權(quán)的典型案例,其形成原因、救濟(jì)困境與模式選擇等研究具有深刻的啟示意義和廣泛的警示意義。商業(yè)秘密確權(quán)途徑有合同約定、制度規(guī)定和法律規(guī)定三種。合同約定是基于雙方當(dāng)事人的自由意志私下創(chuàng)設(shè)權(quán)利,具有較強(qiáng)的主體參與性和主觀隨意性特殊；制度規(guī)定和法律規(guī)定是公開創(chuàng)設(shè)的權(quán)利,與當(dāng)事人的意志無關(guān),具有地位的不平等性和制定者權(quán)利選擇優(yōu)先性特征。商業(yè)秘密法定確權(quán)采用合同優(yōu)先原則,形成私下創(chuàng)設(shè)的權(quán)利與公開創(chuàng)設(shè)權(quán)利之間權(quán)利選擇權(quán)沖突和救濟(jì)困境。商業(yè)秘密瑕疵合同在私下創(chuàng)設(shè)中基于雙方客觀實現(xiàn)中主體地位不平等、信息不對稱、合同爭議、解除條件欠缺約等若干原因,形成商業(yè)秘密瑕疵合同中主體混同、客體混同、權(quán)利內(nèi)容混同三大矛盾和三大混同。商業(yè)秘密瑕疵合同救濟(jì)沒有統(tǒng)一的規(guī)定,民事救濟(jì)中合同法和侵權(quán)法救濟(jì)法條競合時難以選擇,且無法規(guī)范現(xiàn)實中出現(xiàn)多樣情形；刑事救濟(jì)途徑單一,存在刑事救濟(jì)手段濫用的情況。在刑事救濟(jì)和民事救濟(jì)途徑?jīng)_突的情況下,我國實踐中采取的“先刑后民”原則,不利于真實合法權(quán)利人的保護(hù),也違背了有利于當(dāng)事人的訴訟原則。英美國家以判例為主,發(fā)生糾紛時通常以合同理論和侵權(quán)理論的相關(guān)規(guī)定來解決,救濟(jì)途徑中規(guī)定了禁令救濟(jì)、補(bǔ)償性和懲罰性損失賠償?shù)闹贫?這些制度有一定的借鑒意義。解決商業(yè)秘密瑕疵合同侵權(quán)糾紛時嚴(yán)格適用“先民后刑”的救濟(jì)原則。試行禁令制度、第三人救濟(jì)、專利法第八條修改、制定商業(yè)秘密法等完善商業(yè)秘密的保護(hù)。
[Abstract]:Absrtact: a trade secret defective contract is a valid defective contract signed against the true will without one or more valid elements or misunderstandings in the contract for confirming the right of trade secret. There are three types of invalid, revocable and changeable contracts, and the validity of which is to be determined.The remedy of infringement of trade secret under defective contract refers to the remedy of infringement of trade secret based on defective contract of trade secret.Li Mou's trade secret infringement case in Guangxi is a typical case of defective contract infringement. The research on the causes of its formation, relief dilemma and mode selection has profound enlightening significance and wide warning significance.There are three ways to confirm the right of trade secret: contract, system and law.Contractual agreement is based on the free will of both parties to create the right in private, with a strong subjective participation and special subjective arbitrariness, system provisions and legal provisions are open to create the right, has nothing to do with the will of the parties,The status of inequality and the rights of the right to choose the priority of the characteristics.The principle of contract priority is adopted to confirm the legal right of trade secret, which forms the conflict of right of option and relief dilemma between the right of private creation and the right of public creation.In the private creation of a defective trade secret contract, due to the unequal status of the subject in the objective realization of both parties, the asymmetry of information, the dispute of the contract, the lack of conditions for lifting the contract, and so on, the subject and object are mixed together in the trade secret defective contract.The content of rights is mixed with three contradictions and three major contradictions.There is no uniform stipulation on the remedy of defective contract of trade secret, it is difficult to choose when the contract law and tort relief law coincide in civil relief, and there are many kinds of situations in reality.There is an abuse of criminal remedies.In the case of conflict between criminal relief and civil remedy, the principle of "first punishment before people" adopted in our country's practice is not conducive to the protection of the true legal right holder, but also violates the litigant principle in favor of the parties concerned.Anglo-American countries focus on case law and usually settle disputes by the relevant provisions of contract theory and tort theory. The remedies include injunctive relief compensatory and punitive damages systems which have certain significance for reference.The remedy principle of "forerunner's punishment" is strictly applied to solve the infringement dispute of trade secret defect contract.Try out the prohibition system, the third party relief, the patent law the eighth amendment, formulate the trade secret law to perfect the protection of the trade secret.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.6;D922.294;D923.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 江偉,范躍如;刑民交叉案件處理機(jī)制研究[J];法商研究;2005年04期

2 黃東平;;刑民交叉案件處理問題的探討[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬刊);2010年01期

3 張鵬;;論合同履行與否和履行瑕疵的證明責(zé)任承擔(dān)[J];山西經(jīng)濟(jì)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2011年02期

4 張蕾;;商業(yè)秘密的與商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)的認(rèn)定——以“天府可樂”配方及生產(chǎn)工藝商業(yè)秘密案為例[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年02期

5 張素英;;我國商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)現(xiàn)狀調(diào)查分析報告[J];保密工作;2013年02期

6 田圣斌,董邦俊;論合同法第43條對商業(yè)秘密的保護(hù)[J];河北法學(xué);2003年06期

7 丁孟禮;唐全召;;企業(yè)高技術(shù)商業(yè)秘密的法律保護(hù)[J];哈爾濱學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年11期

8 付玉萍;;試論商業(yè)秘密及其法律保護(hù)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)師;2007年04期

9 趙秉志;劉志偉;劉科;;關(guān)于侵犯商業(yè)秘密罪立法完善的研討[J];人民檢察;2010年04期

10 萬伶俐;;論商業(yè)秘密的法律保護(hù)[J];現(xiàn)代商貿(mào)工業(yè);2011年09期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 譚和平;意思表示瑕疵理論與立法比較研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：1740199