本文選題：瑕疵出資 + 股東責(zé)任�。� 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：加入世界貿(mào)易組織十余年，我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)逐步繁榮，市場(chǎng)逐步完善。在市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)逐步完善的過(guò)程中，我國(guó)的各項(xiàng)公司制度愈加合理。2005年修訂的《公司法》和隨后幾年最高法院出臺(tái)的三個(gè)司法解釋適應(yīng)了解決社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展中存在問(wèn)題的需要。2005年出臺(tái)的《公司法》對(duì)瑕疵出資股東的責(zé)任承擔(dān)作出了規(guī)定，新出臺(tái)的司法解釋三也對(duì)瑕疵出資行為規(guī)定為現(xiàn)實(shí)操作提供了更詳細(xì)的指南。筆者欲以現(xiàn)行法律制度規(guī)定為根基，通過(guò)本文就該問(wèn)題系統(tǒng)地分析不同形態(tài)的瑕疵出資行為的民事法律性質(zhì)以在司法實(shí)踐中合理評(píng)判瑕疵出資股東之責(zé)任。在上述責(zé)任明晰的基礎(chǔ)上，從私法的角度辨析行政法應(yīng)當(dāng)出資過(guò)程中怎樣發(fā)揮作用，探討刑法的懲戒功能是否還有必要對(duì)目前的瑕疵出資、抽逃出資行為進(jìn)行懲戒。 本文首先從案例入手發(fā)現(xiàn)問(wèn)題，繼而采用概念分析方法和定性分析法對(duì)瑕疵出資行為的界定及民事責(zé)任的性質(zhì)進(jìn)行分析。對(duì)我國(guó)合同法和侵權(quán)法的規(guī)定結(jié)合瑕疵出資的具體形態(tài)采用語(yǔ)義分析方法，明晰了瑕疵出資股東的責(zé)任承擔(dān)方式。另外參照外國(guó)公司法的相關(guān)規(guī)定，采用比較法分析法就我國(guó)公司法關(guān)于限制瑕疵出資股東的股東權(quán)發(fā)展完善作出立法建議，并討論了公司法增加諸如限制瑕疵出資股東共益權(quán)，瑕疵出資股東失權(quán)或除名制度等規(guī)定以完善我國(guó)公司制度，更好的保護(hù)公司法人和其他股東的權(quán)益。最后本文還就我國(guó)行政法在規(guī)制瑕疵出資的過(guò)程中應(yīng)當(dāng)怎樣參與規(guī)制瑕疵出資行為以及瑕疵出資行為去犯罪化的問(wèn)題從私法的角度進(jìn)行了討論。 文章試圖通過(guò)對(duì)瑕疵出資行為法律性質(zhì)和責(zé)任承擔(dān)方式的明確界定和劃分，確定公司和其他股東應(yīng)對(duì)瑕疵出資行為的私法救濟(jì)方式，以系統(tǒng)的界定瑕疵出資行為的性質(zhì)和合理地確定責(zé)任承擔(dān)方式。筆者在文章的第四部分有關(guān)股東共益權(quán)的限制及股東失權(quán)制度的討論，希望公司股東利用章程的規(guī)定達(dá)到保護(hù)公司和個(gè)人利益的目的，防止瑕疵出資股東利用手中的共益權(quán)損害公司或其他股東利益。文章關(guān)于行政機(jī)關(guān)應(yīng)當(dāng)在股東出資的過(guò)程中應(yīng)主要加強(qiáng)對(duì)出資股東和驗(yàn)資機(jī)構(gòu)，，尤其是驗(yàn)資機(jī)構(gòu)的規(guī)制監(jiān)管力度，而不是對(duì)瑕疵股東充當(dāng)事后懲罰者的角色，打造服務(wù)型政府。另外還論證了私法領(lǐng)域?qū)﹁Υ贸鲑Y行為自有其救濟(jì)方式，刑法應(yīng)退出對(duì)瑕疵出資這種經(jīng)濟(jì)領(lǐng)域中的違法行為的管制。刑法利用剝奪人身自由的方式懲戒某些經(jīng)濟(jì)領(lǐng)域的違法行為不利于市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的繁榮，對(duì)于公司和其他股東也并體現(xiàn)不出益處何在，故關(guān)于瑕疵出資相關(guān)犯罪的作去犯罪化處理符合我國(guó)法治發(fā)展方向。
[Abstract]:After joining WTO for more than ten years, China's economy has been flourishing and the market has been gradually improved.In the course of the gradual improvement of the market economy,The company law revised in 2005 and the three judicial interpretations issued by the Supreme Court in the following years meet the needs of solving the problems existing in the social and economic development.Provisions have been made on the liability of shareholders with defective capital contributions,The new judicial explanation three also provides more detailed guidance for practical operation.On the basis of the current legal system, the author systematically analyzes the civil legal nature of different forms of defective capital contribution in order to judge the responsibility of shareholders in judicial practice.On the basis of the above clear responsibility, this paper analyzes how the administrative law should play a role in the process of capital contribution from the angle of private law, and probes into whether the disciplinary function of criminal law is necessary to punish the current defective capital contribution and the evasion of capital contribution.This paper starts with the case to find out the problem, then uses the concept analysis method and the qualitative analysis method to analyze the definition of the defective capital contribution and the nature of the civil liability.According to the rules of contract law and tort law of our country, this paper adopts the semantic analysis method to clarify the way of the liability of the shareholders of defective capital contribution in combination with the specific form of defective capital contribution.In addition, referring to the relevant provisions of foreign company law, this paper makes a legislative suggestion on the development and perfection of shareholders' rights in China's company law concerning the limitation of the shareholders' rights of defective capital contribution by means of comparative law, and discusses how to increase the rights of shareholders with limited defective capital contribution in company law.In order to perfect the company system and protect the rights and interests of the legal person and other shareholders of the company.Finally, this paper discusses how to participate in the regulation of defective capital contribution and the decriminalization of defective capital contribution in the process of regulation of defective capital contribution in China from the perspective of private law.This paper attempts to define and divide clearly the legal nature and responsibility of defective capital contribution, and to determine the private law remedy for the defective capital contribution by the company and other shareholders.Systematically define the nature of defective capital contribution and reasonably determine the way of liability.In the fourth part of the article, the author discusses the restriction of the shareholders' right of mutual benefit and the system of shareholders' losing their rights, hoping that the shareholders of the company will make use of the provisions of the articles of association to protect the interests of the company and the individual.To prevent defective shareholders from harming the interests of the company or other shareholders by taking advantage of the right of mutual benefit in their hands.In this paper, the author points out that the administrative organs should strengthen the regulation and supervision of the shareholders and the capital verification institutions, especially the capital verification institutions, in the process of the shareholders' contribution, rather than acting as the punishment of the defective shareholders and creating a service-oriented government.In addition, it also demonstrates that there is a remedy in the field of private law to the defective capital contribution, and the criminal law should withdraw from the regulation of the illegal behavior in the economic field of defective capital contribution.Criminal law is not conducive to the prosperity of the market economy by taking advantage of the deprivation of personal liberty to punish the illegal acts in certain economic fields, nor does it reflect the benefits to companies and other shareholders.Therefore, the decriminalization of the crime related to defective capital contribution conforms to the development direction of the rule of law in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 曾寅;;論出資違約責(zé)任與資本充實(shí)責(zé)任的制度辨析[J];企業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2007年03期

本文編號(hào)：1735881