發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-02 06:33

  本文選題：合同解除　切入點(diǎn)：行使制度　出處：《蘭州大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：在我國(guó)合同法中,合同的權(quán)利義務(wù)終止的原因很多,其中,合同的解除是其最重要的原因之一。合同解除和合同的訂立制度、合同的履行制度、合同的擔(dān)保制度和責(zé)任制度等一起共同構(gòu)成我國(guó)合同法完整、嚴(yán)密的體系。近年來(lái),關(guān)于合同解除權(quán)問(wèn)題的研究既是法學(xué)理論界所爭(zhēng)論的熱點(diǎn),同時(shí),還是司法實(shí)務(wù)界的難點(diǎn)之一。我國(guó)合同法對(duì)合同解除權(quán)行使制度的有關(guān)規(guī)定不盡完善,加之民法學(xué)界對(duì)合同解除權(quán)的認(rèn)識(shí)也未達(dá)成一致也有不同的觀點(diǎn)和認(rèn)識(shí),因此,在實(shí)踐中妨礙了合同解除權(quán)的正確行使,合同解除權(quán)成為眾多糾紛的爭(zhēng)議所在。 本文筆者主要是通過(guò)一則案例,具體分析此案例中關(guān)于我國(guó)合同解除權(quán)制度存在的主要問(wèn)題以及爭(zhēng)論焦點(diǎn),從而提出自己的相關(guān)建議措施。本文主要分為三個(gè)部分：第一部分主要是回顧案例,對(duì)案例中關(guān)于合同解除權(quán)的爭(zhēng)議的焦點(diǎn)問(wèn)題,進(jìn)行簡(jiǎn)要的分析；第二部分重點(diǎn)對(duì)于案例中存在爭(zhēng)議的焦點(diǎn)問(wèn)題結(jié)合理論實(shí)踐作出了具體的分析,主要內(nèi)容涉及合同解除權(quán)中關(guān)于主體的問(wèn)題、合同解除權(quán)人是否能夠通過(guò)訴訟或者仲裁解除合同、合同解除權(quán)行使制度期限問(wèn)題和合同解除效力問(wèn)題；第三部分總結(jié)了我國(guó)合同解除權(quán)存在的不足以及提出相關(guān)的建議措施,如明確解除權(quán)主體、明確合同期限以及明確合同解除后是否具有溯及力等建議。
[Abstract]:In the contract law of our country, there are many reasons for the termination of contract rights and obligations, among which, the termination of contract is one of the most important reasons. The contract guarantee system and the liability system together constitute a complete and rigorous system of contract law in China. In recent years, the research on the right to rescind the contract has become a hot topic in the field of legal theory, and at the same time, It is also one of the difficulties in the judicial practice. The relevant provisions of the contract law on the exercise of the right to rescind the contract are not perfect, and the understanding of the right of rescission of the contract has not been agreed upon among the civil law circles, therefore, there are different views and understandings on the right to rescind the contract. In practice, it hinders the correct exercise of the right of rescission of contract, and the right of rescission of contract has become a dispute in many disputes. The author of this paper mainly through a case, the specific analysis of this case about the system of rescission of contracts in China's main problems and the focus of debate, This article is divided into three parts: the first part is to review the case, the focus of the case on the right to terminate the contract issues, a brief analysis; The second part focuses on the focus of the case of the controversial issues combined with theoretical practice to make a specific analysis, the main content of the right to rescind the contract related to the subject, Whether the rescission party can terminate the contract through litigation or arbitration, the duration of the exercise of the right to rescind the contract and the effectiveness of the contract rescission; the third part summarizes the shortcomings of the right to rescind the contract in China and puts forward relevant suggestions. Such as clarifying the subject of rescission, the duration of the contract and whether it has retroactive effect after the termination of the contract.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D923.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 伍治良;根本違約判定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)功能之回歸研究——兼評(píng)我國(guó)合同法相關(guān)規(guī)定之不足[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年03期

2 胡智勇;;合同解除權(quán)的行使方式 對(duì)《合同法》第96條第1款的理解與適用[J];法律適用;2006年Z1期

3 尹田;法國(guó)民法中合同解除的法律適用[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));1995年06期

4 李先波;易純潔;;無(wú)催告情形下合同解除權(quán)的消滅[J];法學(xué)雜志;2010年02期

5 彭慶偉;淺論合同法定解除權(quán)的行使[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2000年06期

6 王碧林;論民事權(quán)利的正確行使[J];中央政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1994年02期

7 薛孝東;合同解除的標(biāo)的新論[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期

8 張志民;;論合同解除[J];商業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2005年11期

9 王利明;合同法的目標(biāo)與鼓勵(lì)交易[J];法學(xué)研究;1996年03期

10 于華欽;肖飛;;合同法定解除權(quán)規(guī)則與實(shí)現(xiàn)[J];理論學(xué)刊;2006年08期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 杜晨妍;合同解除權(quán)行使制度研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 張諾諾;合同解除權(quán)研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2005年

2 楊敏;合同解除權(quán)問(wèn)題初探[D];四川大學(xué);2006年

3 張麗娟;論合同解除權(quán)的行使[D];吉林大學(xué);2007年

4 楊任;合同解除權(quán)制度研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：1699170