本文選題：債權(quán)形式主義　切入點：物權(quán)變動模式　出處：《廣西社會科學(xué)》2014年04期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：我國《合同法》第五十一條規(guī)定無權(quán)處分合同效力待定,是我國"債權(quán)形式主義"的物權(quán)變動模式不能徹底貫徹區(qū)分原則的產(chǎn)物,不利于善意受讓人之保護(hù)。然而《關(guān)于審理買賣合同糾紛案件適用法律問題的解釋》第三條在"物權(quán)形式主義"的理論基礎(chǔ)上認(rèn)可了無權(quán)處分合同的效力。該做法雖然更徹底地落實了區(qū)分原則,卻不得不接受備受質(zhì)疑的"物權(quán)行為"的概念。事實上,通過重新解釋"債權(quán)形式主義",將事實行為的合法性也納入影響物權(quán)變動之"事實構(gòu)成"中,就能徹底落實區(qū)分原則,不必大費(fèi)周章地引入物權(quán)形式主義。此外,落實區(qū)分原則,意味著無權(quán)處分合同是否有效不應(yīng)由物權(quán)人決定,但不能反推其必然有效。當(dāng)事人的主觀狀態(tài)應(yīng)當(dāng)被直接規(guī)定為影響無權(quán)處分合同效力的因素。
[Abstract]:Article 51th of contract Law of our country stipulates that the validity of the contract of unauthorized disposition is to be determined, which is the result of the fact that the mode of real right change of "creditor's right formalism" in our country cannot fully implement the principle of distinction. This is not conducive to the protection of the bona fide transferee. However, the interpretation of the legal issues applicable to the trial of disputes over sale and purchase contracts. Article 3 recognizes the validity of the contract of unauthorized disposition on the basis of the theory of "real right formalism". Although the law implements the principle of distinction more thoroughly, In fact, by reinterpreting "creditor's rights formalism" and incorporating the legality of factual acts into the "composition of facts" that affect the change of real rights, the principle of distinction can be thoroughly implemented. In addition, the implementation of the principle of distinction means that the validity of the contract of unauthorized disposition should not be decided by the real owner. The subjective state of the parties should be directly defined as the factors that affect the effectiveness of the contract of unauthorized disposition.
【作者單位】： 廣西財經(jīng)學(xué)院法學(xué)院;
【基金】：教育部人文社會科學(xué)研究青年基金項目(13YJC820006) 廣西哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)“十一五”規(guī)劃項目(08BFX001)
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 袁明圣;司法解釋“立法化”現(xiàn)象探微[J];法商研究;2003年02期

2 胡玉鴻;;尊重法律:司法解釋的首要原則[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報;2010年01期

3 謝暉;解釋法律與法律解釋[J];法學(xué)研究;2000年05期

4 吳國U，

本文編號：1643415