本文選題：數(shù)據庫　切入點：法律保護　出處：《延邊大學》2007年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】： 高速發(fā)展的新的生產力需要新的生產關系。一定的經濟基礎也總是要求一個相適應的上層建筑為之服務，在信息產業(yè)飛速發(fā)展的今天，全球各國都在重視信息保護的立法和研究，數(shù)據庫的保護也是其中一個致關重要的難題。 由于各國都充分認識到數(shù)據庫的重要性，各國都在探討合適的途徑加以進行保護。對于傳統(tǒng)的數(shù)據庫，各國以版權法和反不正當競爭法的保護為主流。著作權法所說的數(shù)據庫，主要是指對已經存在的作品或簡單事實材料進行選擇、編排、整理和匯編而形成的新的集合物。根據版權法的一般原則，凡是符合版權法獨創(chuàng)性要求的數(shù)據庫，，都可受到著作權法的保護，但此種保護僅僅限于該數(shù)據庫材料的選擇和編排結構，而不延及資料和事實本身，不具有獨創(chuàng)性的數(shù)據庫則不受版權保護，在一定情況下通過反不正當競爭法受到保護。但反不正當競爭法只是對競爭行為中出現(xiàn)的不正當行為加以進行限制，因此一個行為只有被認定為不正當競爭行為時才能適用反不正當競爭法來加以保護。也就是說，不具有獨創(chuàng)性的而且也不屬于不正當競爭行為的數(shù)據庫還是沒有辦法得到保護。但這種數(shù)據庫的信息數(shù)量一般相當龐大而且用起來非常方便，所以不給予保護，則不能使制作者的投資得到回報。這樣一來數(shù)據庫的制作者們也不會太去考慮他的實用性，而只考慮內容和編排上的獨創(chuàng)性。對此筆者認為對于這樣的數(shù)據庫給予特別權利(Sui generic right)予以保護。1996年歐盟頒布了《歐盟數(shù)據庫指令》，該《指令》中創(chuàng)設的數(shù)據庫給予特別權利保護制度具有開創(chuàng)性，目前來說是對數(shù)據庫保護最有力的法案，但因過早出臺的緣故存在一些缺陷。美國對數(shù)據庫的法律也提出過多次法案，雖然至今沒有通過，但幾次提出的法案中所涉及到的有關特別權利保護的內容及為先進。因此本文通過分析歐盟與美國的數(shù)據庫的立法過程，以及我國的數(shù)據庫的保護現(xiàn)狀，加上學者們的觀點，分析對數(shù)據庫給予特別權利保護的缺陷，在此基礎上提出了怎樣完善對數(shù)據庫給予特別權利保護的缺陷的建議。
[Abstract]:The rapid development of new productive forces requires new relations of production. A certain economic base always requires a suitable superstructure to serve it. Today, with the rapid development of the information industry, Countries all over the world attach importance to the legislation and research of information protection, and database protection is one of the most important problems. As all countries are fully aware of the importance of databases, they are exploring appropriate ways to protect them. Copyright Law refers to the database, which mainly refers to the selection and arrangement of existing works or simple factual materials. According to the general principles of copyright law, any database that meets the requirements of originality of copyright law can be protected by copyright law. However, such protection is limited to the selection and structure of the materials of the database and does not extend to the information and facts themselves, and databases that are not original are not protected by copyright, Under certain circumstances, the adoption of an anti-unfair competition law is protected. However, the anti-unfair competition law limits only the unfair acts that occur in the course of competition. Therefore, an act can only be protected by an anti-unfair competition law if it is found to be an act of unfair competition. Databases that are not original and do not belong to unfair competition can still not be protected. However, the amount of information in such databases is generally large and easy to use, so they are not protected, You can't get a return on the maker's investment. So the database makers don't have to think too much about his usefulness. But only considering the originality in content and arrangement. The author thinks that the special right to protect such database is Sui generic right. In 1996, the European Union promulgated the EU Database Directive, which is the database created in the Directive. The system of the protection of special rights is groundbreaking, At present, it is the most effective bill for database protection, but there are some shortcomings due to its premature introduction. The United States has also proposed several bills on database law, although it has not been passed so far. But the contents of special rights protection involved in several bills are advanced. Therefore, this paper analyzes the legislative process of the databases in the EU and the United States, as well as the current situation of database protection in our country, together with the views of scholars. On the basis of analyzing the defects of giving special right protection to database, some suggestions on how to perfect the special right protection for database are put forward.
【學位授予單位】：延邊大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2007
【分類號】：D913

【引證文獻】

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 葉秀明;數(shù)據庫特殊權利保護研究[D];福建師范大學;2010年

本文編號：1627282