本文選題：融資租賃合同　切入點(diǎn)：出租人　出處：《中國(guó)青年政治學(xué)院》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：融資租賃是現(xiàn)代市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)環(huán)境下產(chǎn)生的新型的交易方式，它與傳統(tǒng)的交易方式不同，兼具融資和融物的功能。融資租賃是從英文的financial leasing翻譯而來(lái)，在融資租賃交易中，出租人按照承租人提出的要求，與出賣人（供應(yīng)商）簽訂供貨合同，購(gòu)進(jìn)承租人所需的租賃物，將此租賃物出租給承租人使用，由承租人按照合同的約定定期向出租人繳納租金，承租人所繳納的租金包括購(gòu)買租賃物的貨款、利潤(rùn)以及相關(guān)費(fèi)用。從融資租賃交易的過(guò)程來(lái)看，融資租賃顯示出這樣一些特點(diǎn)：出租人為租賃物的所有人，但并不占有租賃物，承租人對(duì)租賃物享有占有和使用的權(quán)利；融資租賃的租賃物通常不具有通用性，是由承租人根據(jù)其特定需要而選定，在出租人收回后不易轉(zhuǎn)讓；出租人成本和利潤(rùn)的收回取決于承租人能否支付租金，租金能否支付的關(guān)鍵是承租人的誠(chéng)信度和償債能力。交易的特點(diǎn)表明出租人處于權(quán)利易受損害的地位，但是由于融資租賃興起的時(shí)間比較短，融資租賃中出租人的權(quán)利保護(hù)問(wèn)題還沒(méi)有引起足夠的重視。我國(guó)1999年頒布的《合同法》列專章對(duì)融資租賃合同進(jìn)行了規(guī)定，但對(duì)出租人權(quán)利保護(hù)方面的立法還不夠完善，國(guó)內(nèi)的學(xué)術(shù)研究對(duì)出租人權(quán)利保護(hù)還沒(méi)有進(jìn)行全面和深入探討。因此，本文將在闡述當(dāng)前立法中存在的保護(hù)出租人權(quán)利的既定規(guī)則的基礎(chǔ)上，分析在一般情形下和特殊情形下對(duì)出租人權(quán)利的保護(hù)，在對(duì)不同情形的分析中，，本文將聯(lián)系國(guó)外和國(guó)際上的相關(guān)規(guī)定進(jìn)行探討，借以發(fā)現(xiàn)我國(guó)立法中存在的不足之處，希望能為我國(guó)立法的完善提供一些參考。本文分為六個(gè)部分：第一部分為前言；第二部分對(duì)融資租賃進(jìn)行概括性的介紹；第三部分介紹立法中現(xiàn)有的對(duì)出租人權(quán)利進(jìn)行保護(hù)的既定規(guī)則；第四部分和第五部分分別從一般和特殊兩個(gè)方面分析在不同情形下對(duì)出租人權(quán)利的保護(hù)。第六部分為文章的結(jié)語(yǔ)。
[Abstract]:Finance lease is a new type of transaction in the modern market economy, which is different from the traditional transaction method and has the functions of both financing and financing. Finance lease is translated from English financial leasing, in financial lease transaction. The lessor shall, at the request of the lessee, sign a supply contract with the seller (supplier) to purchase the lease item required by the lessee and lease the lease item to the lessee for use, The lessee shall pay rent to the lessor periodically in accordance with the agreement of the contract. The rent paid by the lessee includes the purchase price of the lease item, profits and related expenses. The financial lease shows the following characteristics: the lessor is the owner of the lease item, but does not possess the lease item, and the lessee has the right to possess and use the lease item; the lease item of the financial lease is usually not universal, Is selected by the lessee according to his particular needs and is not easily transferable after the lessor has recovered it; the recovery of the lessor's costs and profits depends on the lessee's ability to pay the rent, The key to whether the rent can be paid is the lessee's good faith and solvency. The characteristics of the transaction indicate that the lessor is in a vulnerable position, but because of the relatively short period of time in which the financial lease arises, The protection of the lessor's rights in the financial lease has not been paid enough attention to. The special chapter of contract Law promulgated in 1999 in our country provides for the financial lease contract, but the legislation on the protection of the lessor's rights is not perfect enough. The domestic academic research has not carried on the comprehensive and thorough discussion to the lessor right protection. Therefore, this article will elaborate the current legislation in the protection lessor right established rule foundation, This paper analyzes the protection of the lessor's rights under general and special circumstances. In the analysis of different situations, this article will discuss the relevant provisions of foreign countries and international laws in order to find out the shortcomings of our legislation. This paper is divided into six parts: the first part is the preface, the second part is the general introduction of financial leasing. The third part introduces the existing legislation on the protection of the lessor's rights established rules; Part 4th and part 5th respectively analyze the protection of lessor's rights under different circumstances from general and special aspects. Part 6th is the conclusion of the article.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)青年政治學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D923.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 姬新江;李利;;論融資租賃合同中承租人的索賠權(quán)[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2005年06期

2 甘勇;美國(guó)資產(chǎn)證券化中若干法律問(wèn)題研究[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2005年03期

3 姬新江;融資租賃合同中承租人索賠權(quán)研究[J];哈爾濱商業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年06期

4 王妍,劉冰封;融資租賃合同的法律特征[J];黑龍江金融;2000年05期

5 欒笑天;;促進(jìn)飛機(jī)租賃資產(chǎn)證券化的發(fā)展[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)導(dǎo)刊;2011年12期

6 任昊麗;王利敏;;融資租賃合同中索賠權(quán)的法律分析[J];山西省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

本文編號(hào)：1581531