論情事變更制度法律效果之構造模式
發(fā)布時間:2018-03-07 22:00
本文選題:再交涉義務模式 切入點:二次效力模式 出處:《山東大學》2017年碩士論文 論文類型:學位論文
【摘要】:情事變更制度的本質是因客觀情事變化造成的損失,通過合同的變更或解除在雙方當事人之間進行合理的分配。根據變更與解除的適用程序,情事變更法律效果的構造模式包括再交涉義務模式、二次效力模式以及或變更或解除模式。在再交涉義務模式中,再交涉義務作為實現合同變更或解除的途徑之一,主要目的是保障合同當事人通過交涉達成變更合同的合意。再交涉義務是由德國學者N·Horn于上個世紀80年代提出的,一經提出受到學界的廣泛關注,在《國際商事合同通則》以及《歐洲合同法原則》中已經對其進行了成文化的表述。二次效力模式主張合同的變更和解除的發(fā)生是有先后之分的,在第一次效力不能解決因情事變更導致的不公平結果時,才發(fā)生第二次效力。這種模式通過賦予一方當事人變更權或解除權以單方意思表示即可,有悖于合同"合意"原則。目前我國最高人民法院通過的司法解釋,確立了我國情事變更制度的或變更或解除模式。這種模式強調當事人因情事變更遭受不利益的,有權請求法院變更或解除合同。在充分認識我國司法現實的基礎上,最高人民法院發(fā)布的通知以及指導意見,在一定程度上保障了情事變更制度的適用。本文除引言與結語之外,共分為四章,結構如下:第一章主要論述了再交涉義務模式,從再交涉義務的一般理論入手,分析再交涉義務的性質、法律地位以及法律效果。針對再交涉義務的不足進行了分析。第二章主要論述了二次效力模式,從二次效力說的產生到二次效力的結構構成,并且就二次效力模式存在的缺陷進行分析。第三章主要論述了或變更或解除模式,從法官自由裁量權到最高人民法院出臺的針對情事變更案件審理的程序規(guī)定,或變更或解除模式在適應我國司法實踐過程中出現的種種不良反應。第四章主要是在總結前三章的基礎上,對再交涉義務在我國實施的必要性和可行性進行分析,與我國現行的或變更或解除模式的比較分析,著重探討了協(xié)商程序與再交涉義務的聯系與區(qū)別,研究了在協(xié)商程序上引入再交涉義務的可行性。在此基礎上對我國情事變更制度的完善提出的幾點建議。
[Abstract]:The essence of the situation change system is the loss caused by the change of the objective situation, and the reasonable distribution between the parties shall be carried out through the change or rescission of the contract. The construction mode of legal effect of circumstance change includes renegotiation obligation model, secondary effect model and renegotiation or rescheduling mode. In renegotiation obligation model, renegotiation obligation is one of the ways to realize contract alteration or rescission. The main purpose is to ensure that the parties to the contract agree to change the contract through negotiation. The obligation of renegotiation was put forward by the German scholar N. Horn on -20s. In the General principles of International Commercial contracts and the principles of European contract Law, it has been culturally stated. The second effect occurs only when the first effect cannot resolve the unfair result caused by the change of circumstances. This mode can be expressed as unilateral intention by giving a party the right to change or rescind, Contrary to the principle of "agreement" of the contract. At present, the judicial interpretation adopted by the Supreme people's Court of our country has established the mode of alteration or dissolution of the situation in our country. The right to request the court to alter or rescind the contract. On the basis of a full understanding of the judicial reality of our country, the Supreme people's Court shall issue a notice and a guiding opinion, In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper is divided into four chapters, the structure of which is as follows: the first chapter mainly discusses the model of renegotiation obligation, starting with the general theory of renegotiation obligation. This paper analyzes the nature, legal status and legal effect of the renegotiation obligation, and analyzes the deficiency of the renegotiation obligation. The second chapter mainly discusses the model of the secondary effect, from the emergence of the secondary effect to the structure of the secondary effect. The third chapter mainly discusses the mode of change or rescission, from the discretion of the judge to the procedural provisions of the Supreme people's Court. The 4th chapter mainly analyzes the necessity and feasibility of implementing the renegotiation obligation in our country on the basis of summarizing the first three chapters. Comparing with the current or changing or rescinding mode in China, the paper emphatically discusses the relation and difference between the negotiation procedure and the obligation of renegotiation. This paper studies the feasibility of introducing the renegotiation obligation into the negotiation procedure, and puts forward some suggestions on the perfection of the situation change system in our country on this basis.
【學位授予單位】:山東大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:D923.6
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前1條
1 葛琳;;證明如同講故事?——故事構造模式對公訴證明的啟示[J];法律科學(西北政法大學學報);2009年01期
相關博士學位論文 前1條
1 王杰;南北地震帶中段三層次構造模式及地震前兆監(jiān)測[D];中國地質大學;2014年
相關碩士學位論文 前2條
1 劉曉暉;論情事變更制度法律效果之構造模式[D];山東大學;2017年
2 周磊;典型外廊式砌體教學樓不同構造模式破壞機理研究[D];中國地震局工程力學研究所;2014年
,本文編號:1581125
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/1581125.html