本文關(guān)鍵詞： 信息 虛假陳述 侵權(quán)行為　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：二十一世紀(jì)是科學(xué)技術(shù)高度發(fā)達(dá)、信息膨脹的世紀(jì)。信息化進(jìn)程在帶給我們物質(zhì)發(fā)展、精神充實的同時，也帶來了一系列的矛盾。諸如：信息自由權(quán)與信息安全的矛盾、信息保密與信息公開的矛盾、信息的社會共享與信息的個人利益的矛盾、信息的不均衡性等。這些矛盾的涌現(xiàn)，使得建立完善一項系統(tǒng)的信息法律體系成為必然。 就民法而言，因信息提供不當(dāng)引起的損害賠償責(zé)任在合同法和侵權(quán)法領(lǐng)域均有涉及。在合同法領(lǐng)域，當(dāng)事人的權(quán)益可以通過追究行為人的締約過失責(zé)任或違約責(zé)任來實現(xiàn)。但是，在現(xiàn)實生活中，并不是所有的交易都是通過一紙契約來約束。因此，由于不存在合同相對性之類的限制，侵權(quán)法可以從責(zé)任范圍和救濟(jì)方式上更加周全地保護(hù)信息用戶的合法權(quán)益。譬如我國臺灣地區(qū)的《證券交易法》在修改時，就將信息披露義務(wù)的違反從契約責(zé)任修改為侵權(quán)責(zé)任。在我國，法律對信息侵權(quán)行為制度未有明確的一般規(guī)定。為了保護(hù)特定權(quán)利主體的民事權(quán)益，《證券法》、《反不正當(dāng)競爭法》等單行法僅對信息侵權(quán)行為有一些特別規(guī)定。但是，由于信息的涉及面較廣，不同類信息又各自具有其復(fù)雜性，信息的提供者和接受者之間也很少發(fā)生直接的合同關(guān)系，現(xiàn)有的法律并不能全面覆蓋信息致害的方方面面。 因此，為了保證市場經(jīng)濟(jì)的健康發(fā)展，維護(hù)社會主義法治的公平正義理念，筆者提出建立信息侵權(quán)行為這一制度，，即在市場經(jīng)濟(jì)中，信息提供人違反法定義務(wù)，提供了虛假、不完整、不適時或誤導(dǎo)性的信息，使基于合理信賴的信息接受、使用者據(jù)此信息作出決策并遭受損失時，信息提供者所應(yīng)承擔(dān)的相應(yīng)的侵權(quán)責(zé)任的一種侵權(quán)行為。通過明確規(guī)定信息侵權(quán)行為的構(gòu)成要件、責(zé)任方式和責(zé)任范圍，可以更好地保護(hù)市場經(jīng)濟(jì)條件下處于信息劣勢地位的交易主體，克服信息不對稱可能帶來的不公平問題，以維護(hù)市場交易安全。
[Abstract]:21th century is a century in which science and technology are highly developed and information expands. The process of informatization brings us material development and spiritual enrichment, but also brings a series of contradictions, such as: the contradiction between the right to freedom of information and the security of information. The contradiction between information secrecy and information disclosure, the contradiction between information sharing and personal interests of information, the unbalance of information, etc. The emergence of these contradictions makes it necessary to establish and perfect a systematic information legal system. As far as civil law is concerned, liability for damages arising from improper provision of information is covered in the field of contract law and tort law. The rights and interests of the parties can be realized by investigating the perpetrator's liability for fault in contracting or breach of contract. However, in real life, not all transactions are restricted by a single contract. Since there are no restrictions such as the relativity of contracts, the tort law can more fully protect the legitimate rights and interests of information users in terms of the scope of liability and the way of relief. For example, when the Securities Exchange Law in the Taiwan region of China was amended, In our country, the breach of information disclosure obligation is modified from contractual liability to tort liability. In order to protect the civil rights and interests of specific subjects of rights and interests, the Securities Law, Anti-unfair Competition Law and other separate laws only have some special provisions on information infringement. However, in order to protect the civil rights and interests of specific rights subjects, the law has no clear general provisions on the system of information infringement. Because of the wide range of information, different types of information have their own complexity, information providers and recipients of information between the occurrence of a direct contract relationship, the existing laws can not cover all aspects of information harm. Therefore, in order to ensure the healthy development of the market economy and maintain the fair and just idea of socialist rule of law, the author puts forward the establishment of the system of information tort, that is, in the market economy, the information provider violates the legal obligation and provides false information. When incomplete, untimely, or misleading information is accepted on the basis of reasonable reliance on which the user makes a decision and suffers a loss, An infringement of the corresponding tort liability to be assumed by an information provider. By clearly defining the constitutive elements, the manner of liability and the scope of liability for an infringing act of information, It can better protect the trading subject in the inferior position of information under the condition of market economy, overcome the unfair problem that the information asymmetry may bring, in order to maintain the market transaction security.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 梁爽;;日本證券虛假陳述責(zé)任法律適用對我國的啟示[J];法學(xué);2011年01期

2 李錦紅,李建強(qiáng);試論信息與決策[J];中國冶金教育;2001年02期

3 徐鑫龍;;信息侵權(quán)民事法律問題研究[J];今日南國(中旬刊);2010年09期

4 彭知輝;;研究綜述:信息與決策[J];新世紀(jì)圖書館;2006年05期

5 謝懷h;;論民事權(quán)利體系[J];法學(xué)研究;1996年02期

6 劉時鳳;信息是科學(xué)決策的基礎(chǔ)[J];山東經(jīng)濟(jì)戰(zhàn)略研究;2003年06期

7 陳文勇 ,楊永生;文獻(xiàn)情報工作與科學(xué)決策[J];圖書館學(xué)研究;1995年06期

8 胡玉鴻;公序良俗與司法活動——訴訟過程的動態(tài)分析之二[J];政法論壇;2002年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 孫燕東;基于投資者保護(hù)的會計信息披露問題研究[D];東北林業(yè)大學(xué);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 沈夢;證券虛假陳述侵權(quán)民事賠償制度研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2007年

本文編號：1532433