本文關(guān)鍵詞：論我國無權(quán)處分合同的效力　出處：《廣西大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 無權(quán)處分合同 物權(quán)變動 合同效力 有效合同

【摘要】：無權(quán)處分是民法上的傳統(tǒng)難題之一。我國合同法及相關(guān)司法解釋對此雖有較多規(guī)定,然而仍然存在一些爭議與疑難。本文基于比較法上無權(quán)處分合同的幾種模式,提出無權(quán)處分合同的效力與物權(quán)變動模式并非必然關(guān)系；進(jìn)而根據(jù)對我國相關(guān)規(guī)范的分析研究,提出無權(quán)處分合同在我國采用債權(quán)形式主義的物權(quán)變動模式下,應(yīng)界定為有效合同。此外本文還分析了,在無權(quán)處分界定為有效的情況下,如何理解善意取得制度的應(yīng)然性與合理性。
[Abstract]:Unauthorized disposition is one of the traditional problems in civil law. However, there are still some disputes and difficulties. Based on several modes of the contract of unauthorized disposition in comparative law, this paper puts forward that the validity of the contract of unauthorized disposition is not necessarily related to the mode of real right change; Then according to the analysis and study of the relevant norms of our country, it is proposed that the unauthorized disposition contract should be defined as an effective contract under the mode of property right change of creditor's right formalism in our country. Under the condition that unauthorized disposition is defined as effective, how to understand the necessity and rationality of bona fide acquisition system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 孟勤國;張凇綸;;英美法物上負(fù)擔(dān)制度及其借鑒價值[J];環(huán)球法律評論;2009年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李軍;無權(quán)處分合同效力與物權(quán)變動模式之關(guān)聯(lián)[D];中國政法大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號：1439217