本文關(guān)鍵詞：合同法定解除制度研究　出處：《廈門大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 法定解除 司法實(shí)踐 實(shí)務(wù)問題

【摘要】： 合同法定解除制度是我國合同法的一項重要制度。由于合同法定解除制度自身的復(fù)雜性和我國《合同法》中法定解除制度存在的特點(diǎn),造成了一些理論上的爭議,也給司法實(shí)務(wù)帶來困擾。 本文大部分問題系從司法實(shí)踐中出現(xiàn)的一些疑難問題出發(fā),結(jié)合相關(guān)理論進(jìn)行分析總結(jié),以期達(dá)到更好地指導(dǎo)司法實(shí)踐的目的。其中,本文圍繞著法定解除制度中的合同法定解除的通知、法定解除權(quán)不當(dāng)行使的救濟(jì)、法定解除權(quán)行使的主體、法定解除權(quán)的消滅和限制、合同解除的法律效果等問題進(jìn)行了研究,部分論述涉及到法定解除制度和約定解除制度共同存在的問題。 本文認(rèn)為:約定解除條件在不違反法律、行政法規(guī)的強(qiáng)制性規(guī)范情況下,若嚴(yán)格于法定解除條件的,依當(dāng)事人意思自治原則,法定解除條件就不再適用;合同中關(guān)于法定解除通知的約定應(yīng)當(dāng)符合意思表示到達(dá)主義規(guī)則方發(fā)生效力;法定解除權(quán)不當(dāng)行使時,相對人有權(quán)直接選擇認(rèn)可合同解除并追究違約方的違約責(zé)任;合同法定解除權(quán)的主體可以包括違約方,在一定情形下違約方有解除合同的權(quán)利;就解除權(quán)消滅,只要債權(quán)人做出和解除合同權(quán)利相反的行為,均可認(rèn)為默示拋棄,除非權(quán)利人能合理證明該相反行為的真意并非要放棄解除權(quán)利;應(yīng)注意透過權(quán)利失效理論鏈接到誠實(shí)信用原則的適用及直接鏈接適用誠實(shí)信用原則導(dǎo)致的對解除權(quán)限制的情形;對直接效果說和折衷說帶來的合同解除效果上的學(xué)說爭論,用比較評價的方法進(jìn)行分析,總結(jié)其中共同之處以減少學(xué)說爭議帶來的司法實(shí)踐的困撓。
[Abstract]:The system of legal rescission of contract is an important system in contract law of our country, because of the complexity of the system of legal rescission of contract and the characteristics of the system of legal rescission in contract law of our country. Has caused some theoretical disputes, but also brought difficulties to the judicial practice. Most of the problems in this paper are from the judicial practice of some difficult problems, combined with the relevant theory to analyze and summarize, in order to achieve a better guide to the purpose of judicial practice. This article revolves around the notice of the legal rescission of the contract, the relief of the improper exercise of the right of legal rescission, the main body of the exercise of the right of legal rescission, the elimination and restriction of the right of legal rescission. This paper studies the legal effect of rescission of contract, and discusses the common problems of the system of legal rescission and the system of contractual rescission. In this paper, the author holds that if the prescribed conditions of dissolution are not in violation of the mandatory norms of laws and administrative regulations, if they are strictly in accordance with the principle of party autonomy, the statutory conditions of rescission will no longer be applicable; The agreement on the legal cancellation notice in the contract shall be in accordance with the rule of the expression of will arrival doctrine before it becomes effective; When the legal right of rescission is improperly exercised, the relative party has the right to directly choose to approve the termination of the contract and to investigate the breach liability of the breaching party; The subject of the legal right to rescind the contract may include the breaching party, and under certain circumstances the breaching party has the right to rescind the contract; As long as the creditor makes an act contrary to the right to rescind the contract, it can be regarded as implied abandonment, unless the obligee can reasonably prove that the intention of the contrary act is not to waive the right of rescission; We should pay attention to the application of the principle of good faith through the theory of right invalidation and the situation of lifting the restriction of right caused by the direct link of applying the principle of good faith. This paper analyzes the theoretical arguments on the effect of contract rescission brought by the direct effect theory and the compromise theory, and summarizes the common punishment of reducing the tortuosity of judicial practice brought about by the theory dispute.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廈門大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：D923.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 袁小梁;析合同解除的三點(diǎn)爭議[J];法律適用;2004年02期

2 蔡立東;論合同解除制度的重構(gòu)[J];法制與社會發(fā)展;2001年05期

3 王軼;;論合同法上的任意性規(guī)范[J];社會科學(xué)戰(zhàn)線;2006年05期

4 葉敏;周俊鵬;;論商事合同解除權(quán)的特殊性[J];新疆社會科學(xué);2007年04期

5 汪淵智;形成權(quán)理論初探[J];中國法學(xué);2003年03期

6 崔建遠(yuǎn);解除權(quán)問題的疑問與釋答(上篇)[J];政治與法律;2005年03期

7 崔建遠(yuǎn);解除權(quán)問題的疑問與釋答(下篇)[J];政治與法律;2005年04期

8 馬春元;;合同解除權(quán)主體探析[J];株洲師范高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報;2006年01期

，

本文編號：1417859