合同無(wú)效后果中的不當(dāng)?shù)美芯?/H1>
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2017-12-27 07:39
本文關(guān)鍵詞：合同無(wú)效后果中的不當(dāng)?shù)美芯?/strong> 出處：《哈爾濱商業(yè)大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文 論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文
更多相關(guān)文章： 合同無(wú)效 返還財(cái)產(chǎn) 不當(dāng)?shù)美?/b> 公平正義
【摘要】：發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)仍然是當(dāng)今各國(guó)的首要任務(wù)和目標(biāo),社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展很大程度上取決于交易的完成,而交易則以合同的訂立和履行為前提。合同無(wú)效便不能發(fā)生當(dāng)事人訂立合同時(shí)所期待實(shí)現(xiàn)的結(jié)果,當(dāng)事人的狀態(tài)又恢復(fù)到訂立合同之前,交易不能完成,阻礙經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展。合同無(wú)效認(rèn)定的相關(guān)規(guī)定的寬泛也給法官的審判工作帶來(lái)了困難,不同法官由于主觀因素對(duì)于同一案件的判決可能不同；另一方面,合同無(wú)效也成為律師為自己當(dāng)事人逃避違約責(zé)任的手段,引起司法實(shí)踐中的混亂。合同我國(guó)合同法僅僅規(guī)定合同無(wú)效的法律后果之一為返還財(cái)產(chǎn),但返還財(cái)產(chǎn)的性質(zhì)認(rèn)定存在著理論上的爭(zhēng)議,存在“物權(quán)請(qǐng)求權(quán)說(shuō)”,“不當(dāng)?shù)美?qǐng)求權(quán)說(shuō)”及“競(jìng)合說(shuō)”。本文主張返還財(cái)產(chǎn)是競(jìng)合性的權(quán)利,不當(dāng)?shù)美?qǐng)求權(quán)也是性質(zhì)獨(dú)立的請(qǐng)求權(quán),文章也在此基礎(chǔ)上做出的論述。此外,財(cái)產(chǎn)應(yīng)如何返還,返還的客體和范圍,返還義務(wù)人的范圍,權(quán)利人行使權(quán)利是否存在抗辯事由等一系列實(shí)務(wù)問(wèn)題,都因?yàn)榱⒎ǖ拇植诤秃?jiǎn)陋而缺乏可操作性。本文提出合理的完善建議,使法律規(guī)定的體系更和諧。 在世界范圍內(nèi),英美法系的國(guó)家,合同、侵權(quán)與不當(dāng)?shù)美贫纫呀?jīng)成為現(xiàn)代民法的三大基石,大陸法系的國(guó)家中也得到了應(yīng)有的重視,而我國(guó)對(duì)這些民法中的傳統(tǒng)而重要的制度的研究卻是相當(dāng)欠缺的,論文等內(nèi)容多為十年前做出的研究,而近十年幾乎為空白,很少有所涉獵,專(zhuān)著數(shù)量也很有限。有限的資源主要集中研究一些“熱門(mén)”或“前衛(wèi)”的課題。本文則把合同無(wú)效以及不當(dāng)?shù)美贫冉Y(jié)合,對(duì)比國(guó)內(nèi)外的立法現(xiàn)狀,在合同無(wú)效視角下闡述不當(dāng)?shù)美南嚓P(guān)問(wèn)題,即合同無(wú)效時(shí)不當(dāng)?shù)美?qǐng)求權(quán)如何行使進(jìn)行論述,提出完善建議,從而通過(guò)該制度使合同無(wú)效得以很好的解決。
[Abstract]:The development of economy is still the primary task and goal of all countries. The development of social economy depends largely on the completion of transactions, and the transaction is based on the premise of contract formation and action. If a contract is void, it cannot happen when the parties conclude the contract, and the state of the party is resumed until the contract is concluded, so the transaction cannot be completed and impede the economic development. Relevant provisions of the contract is null and void, the broad to the judge's judicial work is difficult, due to different judges subjective factors for the same decision may be different; on the other hand, the contract is invalid also become lawyers evade liability for breach of contract means for their own parties, causing confusion in judicial practice. The contract law of China only stipulates that one of the legal consequences of the invalidity of contract is to return the property, but there is a theoretical controversy about the nature of the returned property. There are "claims for real rights", "unjust enrichment claims" and "Co opetition". This article claims that the return of property is the right of concurrence, and the claim of unjust enrichment is also the right of independence, and the article is also discussed on the basis of this article. In addition, a series of practical problems such as how to return the property, return the object and scope, return the scope of the obligor, and whether the right holder exercise rights, or whether there are reasons for the defense, are all lack of operability because of the rough and crude legislation. This paper puts forward reasonable suggestions to make the system more harmonious.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：哈爾濱商業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條
1 崔建遠(yuǎn);關(guān)于恢復(fù)原狀、返還財(cái)產(chǎn)的辨析[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2005年01期
2 許慧菁;;違法合同無(wú)效之后的返還財(cái)產(chǎn)請(qǐng)求權(quán)[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2012年11期
3 李軍政,崔蘭琴;論合同的“失效”與不當(dāng)?shù)美?qǐng)求權(quán)[J];九江學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 李祖坤;合同無(wú)效的司法處理[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年
2 黃忠;無(wú)效法律行為制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2009年
，
本文編號(hào)：1340840
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/1340840.html
本文關(guān)鍵詞：合同無(wú)效后果中的不當(dāng)?shù)美芯?/strong> 出處：《哈爾濱商業(yè)大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文 論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文
更多相關(guān)文章： 合同無(wú)效 返還財(cái)產(chǎn) 不當(dāng)?shù)美?/b> 公平正義
【摘要】：發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)仍然是當(dāng)今各國(guó)的首要任務(wù)和目標(biāo),社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展很大程度上取決于交易的完成,而交易則以合同的訂立和履行為前提。合同無(wú)效便不能發(fā)生當(dāng)事人訂立合同時(shí)所期待實(shí)現(xiàn)的結(jié)果,當(dāng)事人的狀態(tài)又恢復(fù)到訂立合同之前,交易不能完成,阻礙經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展。合同無(wú)效認(rèn)定的相關(guān)規(guī)定的寬泛也給法官的審判工作帶來(lái)了困難,不同法官由于主觀因素對(duì)于同一案件的判決可能不同；另一方面,合同無(wú)效也成為律師為自己當(dāng)事人逃避違約責(zé)任的手段,引起司法實(shí)踐中的混亂。合同我國(guó)合同法僅僅規(guī)定合同無(wú)效的法律后果之一為返還財(cái)產(chǎn),但返還財(cái)產(chǎn)的性質(zhì)認(rèn)定存在著理論上的爭(zhēng)議,存在“物權(quán)請(qǐng)求權(quán)說(shuō)”,“不當(dāng)?shù)美?qǐng)求權(quán)說(shuō)”及“競(jìng)合說(shuō)”。本文主張返還財(cái)產(chǎn)是競(jìng)合性的權(quán)利,不當(dāng)?shù)美?qǐng)求權(quán)也是性質(zhì)獨(dú)立的請(qǐng)求權(quán),文章也在此基礎(chǔ)上做出的論述。此外,財(cái)產(chǎn)應(yīng)如何返還,返還的客體和范圍,返還義務(wù)人的范圍,權(quán)利人行使權(quán)利是否存在抗辯事由等一系列實(shí)務(wù)問(wèn)題,都因?yàn)榱⒎ǖ拇植诤秃?jiǎn)陋而缺乏可操作性。本文提出合理的完善建議,使法律規(guī)定的體系更和諧。 在世界范圍內(nèi),英美法系的國(guó)家,合同、侵權(quán)與不當(dāng)?shù)美贫纫呀?jīng)成為現(xiàn)代民法的三大基石,大陸法系的國(guó)家中也得到了應(yīng)有的重視,而我國(guó)對(duì)這些民法中的傳統(tǒng)而重要的制度的研究卻是相當(dāng)欠缺的,論文等內(nèi)容多為十年前做出的研究,而近十年幾乎為空白,很少有所涉獵,專(zhuān)著數(shù)量也很有限。有限的資源主要集中研究一些“熱門(mén)”或“前衛(wèi)”的課題。本文則把合同無(wú)效以及不當(dāng)?shù)美贫冉Y(jié)合,對(duì)比國(guó)內(nèi)外的立法現(xiàn)狀,在合同無(wú)效視角下闡述不當(dāng)?shù)美南嚓P(guān)問(wèn)題,即合同無(wú)效時(shí)不當(dāng)?shù)美?qǐng)求權(quán)如何行使進(jìn)行論述,提出完善建議,從而通過(guò)該制度使合同無(wú)效得以很好的解決。
[Abstract]:The development of economy is still the primary task and goal of all countries. The development of social economy depends largely on the completion of transactions, and the transaction is based on the premise of contract formation and action. If a contract is void, it cannot happen when the parties conclude the contract, and the state of the party is resumed until the contract is concluded, so the transaction cannot be completed and impede the economic development. Relevant provisions of the contract is null and void, the broad to the judge's judicial work is difficult, due to different judges subjective factors for the same decision may be different; on the other hand, the contract is invalid also become lawyers evade liability for breach of contract means for their own parties, causing confusion in judicial practice. The contract law of China only stipulates that one of the legal consequences of the invalidity of contract is to return the property, but there is a theoretical controversy about the nature of the returned property. There are "claims for real rights", "unjust enrichment claims" and "Co opetition". This article claims that the return of property is the right of concurrence, and the claim of unjust enrichment is also the right of independence, and the article is also discussed on the basis of this article. In addition, a series of practical problems such as how to return the property, return the object and scope, return the scope of the obligor, and whether the right holder exercise rights, or whether there are reasons for the defense, are all lack of operability because of the rough and crude legislation. This paper puts forward reasonable suggestions to make the system more harmonious.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：哈爾濱商業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條
1 崔建遠(yuǎn);關(guān)于恢復(fù)原狀、返還財(cái)產(chǎn)的辨析[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2005年01期
2 許慧菁;;違法合同無(wú)效之后的返還財(cái)產(chǎn)請(qǐng)求權(quán)[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2012年11期
3 李軍政,崔蘭琴;論合同的“失效”與不當(dāng)?shù)美?qǐng)求權(quán)[J];九江學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 李祖坤;合同無(wú)效的司法處理[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年
2 黃忠;無(wú)效法律行為制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2009年
，本文編號(hào)：1340840
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/1340840.html
最近更新
教材專(zhuān)著
