馬約特島的法律地位：法國(guó)的海外領(lǐng)地還是科摩羅的分離領(lǐng)土？
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2021-02-16 02:07
馬約特島是科摩羅群島的四個(gè)島嶼之一,自從1975年科摩羅宣布包括馬約特島在內(nèi)的四個(gè)島嶼獨(dú)立以來(lái),馬約特島一直是一個(gè)有爭(zhēng)議性的問(wèn)題。爭(zhēng)議的焦點(diǎn)是關(guān)于馬約特島的主權(quán)問(wèn)題,該島嶼由法國(guó)管理,而科摩羅聲稱(chēng)對(duì)其擁有主權(quán)。事實(shí)上,在該群島的非殖民化進(jìn)程失敗后,根據(jù)1974年12月22日組織的全民公決的投票結(jié)果,科摩羅于1975年7月6日單方面宣布四島從法國(guó)獨(dú)立。因此,法國(guó)決定承認(rèn)部分群島的獨(dú)立:投票支持獨(dú)立的四個(gè)島嶼中,有三個(gè)島嶼支持獨(dú)立,第四個(gè)島嶼馬約特島,因?yàn)樗诠镀陂g的反對(duì)票,仍然處于法國(guó)政府的管轄之下。2011年,法國(guó)決定將科摩羅馬約特島的地位轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)榉▏?guó)的海外領(lǐng)地,從而剝奪科摩羅的部分領(lǐng)土。理論上,當(dāng)代的科摩羅是由四個(gè)島嶼組成的國(guó)家——聯(lián)合國(guó)決議承認(rèn)科摩羅領(lǐng)土由大科摩羅、昂儒昂、莫埃利和馬約特四島組成,但在實(shí)踐中科摩羅在馬約特島的主權(quán)仍受限于其前殖民國(guó)家的影響,并在此意義上形成了關(guān)于馬約特島的領(lǐng)土爭(zhēng)端。本文的目的是要詳細(xì)分析馬約特島問(wèn)題,以確定它在國(guó)際法上的法律地位。我們通過(guò)運(yùn)用國(guó)際法原則和國(guó)家法律作為證據(jù)來(lái)清楚地表明,馬約特島構(gòu)成了科摩羅國(guó)的完整部分,因此,它作為法國(guó)海外領(lǐng)地的地位是以...
【文章來(lái)源】：中南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)湖北省 211工程院校 教育部直屬院校
【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：264 頁(yè)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【文章目錄】：
Abstract
摘要
Dedication
Acknowledgements
List of Abbreviations and Symbols
General Introduction
Part 1 : The Comorian people's right to self-determination
Chapter 1: The colonisation period of the archipelago of Comoros
1.1. The archipelago of Comoros under French protectorate regime
1.1.1. Establishment of the protectorate regime in Comoros
1.1.2. The contestation of the protectorate regime
1.2. The new status of Comoros:the French colony
1.2.1. The annexation Act and its scope
1.2.2. The contestation of the attachment
1.3. The internal autonomy of Comoros:the way to independence
1.3.1. The phase of the administrative and financial autonomy
1.3.2. The framework law of 1956
1.3.3. The Internal autonomy of Comoros
Chapter 2: Accession of Comoros into independence
2.1. General view of self-determination
2.1.1. Historical perspective of the right to self-determination
2.1.1.1. Self-determination before the First World War
2.1.1.2. Self-determination after the First World War
2.1.1.3. Self-determination under the international law jargon
2.1.1.3.1. Self-determination under aegis of articles 1 § 2 and 55 of the UNCharter
2.1.1.3.2. The UN General Assembly Resolutions 1514 （XV） and 1541（XV）
2.1.1.3.3. The International Covenants of 1966
2.1.1.3.4. The Declaration on Friendly Relations
2.1.1.3.5. The African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights
2.1.1.3.6. The Helsinki Final Act
2.1.1.3.7. The Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice
2.1.2. Different meanings and forms of self-determination
2.1.2.1. Self-determination: right or principle?
2.1.2.2. Different forms of the right of people to self-determination
2.1.2.2.1. External self-determination
2.1.2.2.2. Internal self-determination
2.2. Comoros' self-determination
2.2.1. The conditions to implement the right to self-determination in Comoros
2.2.1.1. The quality of Comorian people:the subjugated people
2.2.1.2. The colonial domination
2.2.2. The operation of self-determination of Comoros
2.2.2.1. The organisation of referendum of 22 December 1974
2.2.2.1.1. The political bases of self-determination in Comoros
2.2.2.1.2. The legal basis of self-determination referendum of Comoros
2.2.2.1.3. The popular consultation of 22 December 1974
2.2.3. The political and legal consequences of the self-determination referendumof 22 December 1974
2.2.3.1. The failure of the decolonisation process of Comoros caused by the Parliament
2.2.3.2. The unilateral declaration of independence of Comoros
2.3. The recognition of independence of Comoros
2.3.1. The recognition by the ex-colonial power
2.3.2. The recognition by the international community
Conclusion of the first part
Part 2: Mayotte:French Overseas Department or dismemberment of Comoros?
Chapter 3: Does the island of Mayotte have a separated right to self-determination?
3.1. Do wa maore comtitute people other than the people of Comoros?
3.2. Does the population of Mayotte have the right to refuse independence?
3.2.1. There is no right to refuse independence
3.2.2. Mayotte's theses against independence
3.2.2.1. The "realities" of Mayotte's attachment to France
3.2.2.2. The truth about Mayotte's attachment to France
Chapter 4: Scope and limits to the self-determination of Mayotte
4.1. Mayotte's right to self-determination is subject to the territorial integrity of Comoros
4.1.1. The principle of territorial integrity in international law
4.1.2. Wa maore's right to self-determination and the principle of the territorial integrity of Comoros
4.1.2.1. Self-determination of Comoros cannot be plural
4.1.2.2. Self-determination of Comoros involves the preservation of the territorial integrity of the Comorian overseas territory
4.2. The principle of the right of peoples to self-determination does not meansecession
4.3. The prohibition of the secession
4.3.1. The prohibition of secession in international law
4.3.2. The exception of the prohibition: the remedial secession
4.3.2.1. The constitutional right to secession
4.3.2.2. The remedial secession
4.3.3. International practice against secessions:the case of Comoros
Conclusion of the second part
Part 3: France's non-compliance with international law
Chapter 5: The violation by France of the Vienna Convention of the Law of Treaties of 1969
5.1. Violation of the Vienna Convention of 1969
5.1.1. The violation of article 26 of the Vienne Convention of 1969
5.1.1.1. Rule of good faith
5.1.1.2. The violation of the rule of good faith in the Comoros' self-determination process
5.1.2. The violation of article 27 of the Vienne Convention of 1969
5.2. The questionable position of France enshrined in the decision of 31 December 1975 on the self-determination of Comoros
5.2.1. Determination of the modalities for the implementation of article 53 of the France Constitution of 1958
5.2.2. The erroneous assertion of respect for international rules
Chapter 6: France's non-compliance with international law
6.1. France's violation of the principle of uti possidetis juris
6.1.1. The meaning of the principle of uti possidetis juris in international law
6.1.2. The principle of uti possidetis juris in the case of Comoros
6.2. Permanent interference in the internal affairs of Comoros by France
6.2.1. The meaning of the principle of uti possidetis juris in international law
6.2.2. Comoros' internal affairs violated by France
6.2.2.1. The mercenary phenomena in Comoros
6.2.2.2. The deportation of President SAID MOHAMED DJOHAR
6.2.2.3. The affair MOHAMED BACAR
Conclusion of the third part
Part 4: The way forward to settle the Franco-Comorian territorial dispute over Mayotte
Chapter 7: Sharing the sovereignty on Mayotte between Comoros and France:the condominium theory
7.1. The concept of condominium in international law
7.1.1. The general meaning of sovereignty in international law
7.1.2. The absolutism State sovereignty and its limits: the limitation of sovereignty and the sharing of sovereignty
7.1.3. Sharing sovereignty, an exceptional notion in international law:the condominium
7.2. Different perspectives of sharing sovereignty and competences
7.2.1. Comorian sovereignty, French administration
7.2.2. One sovereignty, two administrations
Chapter 8: The implication of the United Nations bodies to settle the Franco-Comorian territorial dispute over Mayotte
8.1. Request of an advisory opinion before International Court of Justice
8.2. Seizing the United Nations Security Council
8.3. Forum prorogatum
Conclusion of the fourth part
Part 5: General Conclusion & Recommendations
Chapter 9: Conclusion
Chapter 10: Recommendations
10.1. The Comorian government must have a strong national policy on thisquestion
10.2. Promoting the country's economic development
10.3. France's policy to be improved
Bibliography
Books & theses
Articles & newspaper column
Cited Cases
Treaties,Conventions and Declarations
Security Council Resolutions
General Assembly Resolutions
Organisation of African Unity and African Union Resolutions
National Constitutions, Domestic Legislations
Website
Annexe Ⅰ
本文編號(hào)：3035952
【文章來(lái)源】：中南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)湖北省 211工程院校 教育部直屬院校
【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：264 頁(yè)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【文章目錄】：
Abstract
摘要
Dedication
Acknowledgements
List of Abbreviations and Symbols
General Introduction
Part 1 : The Comorian people's right to self-determination
Chapter 1: The colonisation period of the archipelago of Comoros
1.1. The archipelago of Comoros under French protectorate regime
1.1.1. Establishment of the protectorate regime in Comoros
1.1.2. The contestation of the protectorate regime
1.2. The new status of Comoros:the French colony
1.2.1. The annexation Act and its scope
1.2.2. The contestation of the attachment
1.3. The internal autonomy of Comoros:the way to independence
1.3.1. The phase of the administrative and financial autonomy
1.3.2. The framework law of 1956
1.3.3. The Internal autonomy of Comoros
Chapter 2: Accession of Comoros into independence
2.1. General view of self-determination
2.1.1. Historical perspective of the right to self-determination
2.1.1.1. Self-determination before the First World War
2.1.1.2. Self-determination after the First World War
2.1.1.3. Self-determination under the international law jargon
2.1.1.3.1. Self-determination under aegis of articles 1 § 2 and 55 of the UNCharter
2.1.1.3.2. The UN General Assembly Resolutions 1514 （XV） and 1541（XV）
2.1.1.3.3. The International Covenants of 1966
2.1.1.3.4. The Declaration on Friendly Relations
2.1.1.3.5. The African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights
2.1.1.3.6. The Helsinki Final Act
2.1.1.3.7. The Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice
2.1.2. Different meanings and forms of self-determination
2.1.2.1. Self-determination: right or principle?
2.1.2.2. Different forms of the right of people to self-determination
2.1.2.2.1. External self-determination
2.1.2.2.2. Internal self-determination
2.2. Comoros' self-determination
2.2.1. The conditions to implement the right to self-determination in Comoros
2.2.1.1. The quality of Comorian people:the subjugated people
2.2.1.2. The colonial domination
2.2.2. The operation of self-determination of Comoros
2.2.2.1. The organisation of referendum of 22 December 1974
2.2.2.1.1. The political bases of self-determination in Comoros
2.2.2.1.2. The legal basis of self-determination referendum of Comoros
2.2.2.1.3. The popular consultation of 22 December 1974
2.2.3. The political and legal consequences of the self-determination referendumof 22 December 1974
2.2.3.1. The failure of the decolonisation process of Comoros caused by the Parliament
2.2.3.2. The unilateral declaration of independence of Comoros
2.3. The recognition of independence of Comoros
2.3.1. The recognition by the ex-colonial power
2.3.2. The recognition by the international community
Conclusion of the first part
Part 2: Mayotte:French Overseas Department or dismemberment of Comoros?
Chapter 3: Does the island of Mayotte have a separated right to self-determination?
3.1. Do wa maore comtitute people other than the people of Comoros?
3.2. Does the population of Mayotte have the right to refuse independence?
3.2.1. There is no right to refuse independence
3.2.2. Mayotte's theses against independence
3.2.2.1. The "realities" of Mayotte's attachment to France
3.2.2.2. The truth about Mayotte's attachment to France
Chapter 4: Scope and limits to the self-determination of Mayotte
4.1. Mayotte's right to self-determination is subject to the territorial integrity of Comoros
4.1.1. The principle of territorial integrity in international law
4.1.2. Wa maore's right to self-determination and the principle of the territorial integrity of Comoros
4.1.2.1. Self-determination of Comoros cannot be plural
4.1.2.2. Self-determination of Comoros involves the preservation of the territorial integrity of the Comorian overseas territory
4.2. The principle of the right of peoples to self-determination does not meansecession
4.3. The prohibition of the secession
4.3.1. The prohibition of secession in international law
4.3.2. The exception of the prohibition: the remedial secession
4.3.2.1. The constitutional right to secession
4.3.2.2. The remedial secession
4.3.3. International practice against secessions:the case of Comoros
Conclusion of the second part
Part 3: France's non-compliance with international law
Chapter 5: The violation by France of the Vienna Convention of the Law of Treaties of 1969
5.1. Violation of the Vienna Convention of 1969
5.1.1. The violation of article 26 of the Vienne Convention of 1969
5.1.1.1. Rule of good faith
5.1.1.2. The violation of the rule of good faith in the Comoros' self-determination process
5.1.2. The violation of article 27 of the Vienne Convention of 1969
5.2. The questionable position of France enshrined in the decision of 31 December 1975 on the self-determination of Comoros
5.2.1. Determination of the modalities for the implementation of article 53 of the France Constitution of 1958
5.2.2. The erroneous assertion of respect for international rules
Chapter 6: France's non-compliance with international law
6.1. France's violation of the principle of uti possidetis juris
6.1.1. The meaning of the principle of uti possidetis juris in international law
6.1.2. The principle of uti possidetis juris in the case of Comoros
6.2. Permanent interference in the internal affairs of Comoros by France
6.2.1. The meaning of the principle of uti possidetis juris in international law
6.2.2. Comoros' internal affairs violated by France
6.2.2.1. The mercenary phenomena in Comoros
6.2.2.2. The deportation of President SAID MOHAMED DJOHAR
6.2.2.3. The affair MOHAMED BACAR
Conclusion of the third part
Part 4: The way forward to settle the Franco-Comorian territorial dispute over Mayotte
Chapter 7: Sharing the sovereignty on Mayotte between Comoros and France:the condominium theory
7.1. The concept of condominium in international law
7.1.1. The general meaning of sovereignty in international law
7.1.2. The absolutism State sovereignty and its limits: the limitation of sovereignty and the sharing of sovereignty
7.1.3. Sharing sovereignty, an exceptional notion in international law:the condominium
7.2. Different perspectives of sharing sovereignty and competences
7.2.1. Comorian sovereignty, French administration
7.2.2. One sovereignty, two administrations
Chapter 8: The implication of the United Nations bodies to settle the Franco-Comorian territorial dispute over Mayotte
8.1. Request of an advisory opinion before International Court of Justice
8.2. Seizing the United Nations Security Council
8.3. Forum prorogatum
Conclusion of the fourth part
Part 5: General Conclusion & Recommendations
Chapter 9: Conclusion
Chapter 10: Recommendations
10.1. The Comorian government must have a strong national policy on thisquestion
10.2. Promoting the country's economic development
10.3. France's policy to be improved
Bibliography
Books & theses
Articles & newspaper column
Cited Cases
Treaties,Conventions and Declarations
Security Council Resolutions
General Assembly Resolutions
Organisation of African Unity and African Union Resolutions
National Constitutions, Domestic Legislations
Website
Annexe Ⅰ
本文編號(hào)：3035952
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/3035952.html
最近更新
教材專(zhuān)著
