【摘要】：《ICSID公約》所創(chuàng)設(shè)的爭端解決機(jī)制滿足了國際商事交易當(dāng)事方對投資爭端解決手段的需求和選擇。但由于存在著主權(quán)豁免因素,從而導(dǎo)致ICSID仲裁裁決的執(zhí)行仍然困難重重。在國際商事交往中,爭端的有效解決是公認(rèn)之理、應(yīng)有之意,爭端雙方均有責(zé)任、有義務(wù)尊重并遵守爭端解決機(jī)構(gòu)依法得出的結(jié)論。當(dāng)國家以私性主體身份從事商事行為時(shí),執(zhí)行針對其私性財(cái)產(chǎn)所作出的某項(xiàng)仲裁裁決是邏輯發(fā)展的一個(gè)必然結(jié)果。
[Abstract]:The dispute settlement mechanism created by the ICSID Convention meets the needs and choices of the parties to international commercial transactions for the settlement of investment disputes. However, due to the existence of sovereign immunity, the enforcement of ICSID arbitral award is still difficult. In international commercial exchanges, the effective settlement of disputes is a recognized principle and should mean that both parties to the dispute have the responsibility and obligation to respect and abide by the conclusions reached by the dispute settlement body in accordance with the law. When a state engages in commercial acts as a private subject, the execution of an arbitral award against its private property is an inevitable result of logical development.
【作者單位】： 北京大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：北京市高等教育精品教材項(xiàng)目(2004)
【分類號】：D997.4
，

本文編號：2507861